Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 189 comments are related to the topic:
Moore stuffs up yet again!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 189
By:
aberdonia
When: 24 Jun 17 15:50
Heffernan would win all the races Moore wins for Coolmore and probably more.
By:
aberdonia
When: 24 Jun 17 15:50
Heffernan would win all the races Moore wins for Coolmore and probably more.
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 24 Jun 17 15:51
Poor?
By:
Deptford
When: 24 Jun 17 15:51
Went too soon
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 24 Jun 17 15:55
Are you suggesting Dartmouth should have won?
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 15:56
As I said the lad is average.
By:
BornToWin
When: 24 Jun 17 15:57
A poor judge of pace is his main weakness, going was probably a bit quick for Dartmouth but never mind set it up for the boss.
By:
Clerkmore
When: 24 Jun 17 15:59
The ground was too fast for Dartmouth.
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 16:01
Why run it then ? take it home for another day.
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 24 Jun 17 16:02
So what was average about the ride on Dartmouth?
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 16:06
He took it up FAR too soon for starters,when it won at York never got to the front till the last strides.
By:
FELTFAIR
When: 24 Jun 17 16:07
So you are suggesting he should have won the race?
By:
ProSniper
When: 24 Jun 17 16:08
O'Brien just said Seamie is world class.

World Class Heffernan vs UK class Moore.
By:
enpassant
When: 24 Jun 17 16:26
The Dartmouth ride is not the issue for me. He gave that horse a chance and it wasn't good enough on the day. So many others he throws away (or at the very least makes it unnecessarly very difficult to win)long before the race end.
By:
rmccarthy16
When: 24 Jun 17 16:33
workrider, you say you work in the industry so why do you come across as thick? Moore took it up because it's strongest suit is it stamina.
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 16:37
Mac, if its strong suit is stamina why the heck didn't it win then ?...York showed the way it needs to be rode,Ryan a one trick pony imo.
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 16:38
Strangely enough Moore was too far forward this time and had no option but to take it up sooner than he'd have liked when the pacesetter dropped back. I do not think Dartmouth would have won regardless.

However, would Bentley have won on Limato in the Diamond Jubilee? He knows the horse much better than Moore.
By:
asparagus
When: 24 Jun 17 16:44
You couldn't make it up. People with their own agenda looking like absolute fools. Anyone criticising the ride on Dartmouth might as well give up the game. Totally ludicrous. He also had Limato in the perfect spot and it wasn't quite good enough on the day.
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 16:50
So he gets two favs beaten one after the other and asparagus is still licking his arse,that's right mate you couldn't make it up.
By:
Deptford
When: 24 Jun 17 16:55
Asparagus, you couldn't make it up, no plan B when race is not working out, at beat average in a sea of mediocrity
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 16:57
I cannot remember if Limato had ever challenged between horses at the business end. Can anyone help? I'm not saying he'd have won but..........
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 17:01
Oh dear, Moore is on the fav Raucous - 3 fav defeats in a roll?
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 17:07
Another bad ride from Mr Moore. He positioned his mount Raucous right at the back (yes stone last). Very good jockey, anyone disagree?
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 17:07
Keeps it LAST for most of the way ffs, guy should be roasted for that ride.
By:
sageform
When: 24 Jun 17 17:13
Where exactly do you suggest he went on Limato? He had a clear passage until the first 2 came across towards him on either side. If his horse wasn't fast enough to get past them, it was inevitable that he would be squeezed.
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 17:16
Sage,a top jockey makes sure that don't happen.
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 17:18
This is what I cannot understand about the journos of horse racing these days.

Starkey got roasted, admonished, castigated and discarded for his Dancing Brave ride in the Epsom Derby yet Moore with his repeated injudicious ride of Group races were forgotten or accepted as "unfortunate"; his ride on Raucous is the worst so far but there is still one race left to better that.
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 17:21
If I remember correctly Limato does not like to be crowded thus generally challenged on the outside of every horse but glad to be proven wrong.
By:
workrider
When: 24 Jun 17 18:44
All Ryans fans gone off to lick their wounds after the last few results.
By:
MJK
When: 24 Jun 17 19:01

Jun 24, 2017 -- 6:44PM, workrider wrote:


All Ryans fans gone off to lick their wounds after the last few results.


Even though he's retired Johnny would've ridden at least another 3 winners over the week if he'd ridden the same horses

By:
thelatarps
When: 24 Jun 17 20:17
Ryan rode 12 favs at this years ascot, a ridiculous number really. He won on only 4, but then only 7 jollies obliged from 30 races all
week.
Its ultra competitive racing at ascot and there are a lot of really bad prices available on favourites owing to factors which often have
nothing to do with the ability of the horse.
He does tend to ride a lot of these.
Churchill and Order Of St George were bittely disappointing results.
If nothing comes to light regarding the fitness of CHurchill then Ryan needs slating for the ride he gave Churchill. Doubt there was much he could have done in the Gold Cup.
As for the Wokingham. Well if you go in on a 11/2 fav in a 30 runner handicap then vaya con dios..
By:
impossible123
When: 24 Jun 17 21:41
Moore rode 12 fav in 30 races of which 4 were odds-on ie Churchill, Winter, Order of St George and Caravaggio - 1st 2 long odds -on but only two obliged. All these were in non-handicaps of which a normal success rate would be about 66% regardless of jockey but he only achieved 50%.

Anyone betting against Moore on the fav would be many squids in, agree? Some of his 30 races - he was riding in most if not all -
had little or no chance given the position he adopted on them eg behind a wall of horses/too far back. 

Moore is no great jockey as most like to think he is, but for Coolmore I do not think Godolphin would have him as their numero uno either.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 24 Jun 17 22:26
Some very interesting comments here about the ride on Dartmouth.
Same with the ride on Churchill.
Horses that clearly weren't good enough on the day.

To read some of the stuff, you'd think it is the horses that run like clockwork, and the jockeys whose form is all over the place.
Instead of the other way around.

And the trainers as well who give the jockeys their riding instructions, or at the very least discuss tactics with them. Such as riding for the win, going for the place money, or even simply there to give the horse a run for another day.
They also get regarded as idiots here.
By:
MJK
When: 24 Jun 17 22:40

Jun 24, 2017 -- 10:26PM, Dr Crippen wrote:


Some very interesting comments here about the ride on Dartmouth.Same with the ride on Churchill.Horses that clearly weren't good enough on the day.To read some of the stuff, you'd think it is the horses that run like clockwork, and the jockeys whose form is all over the place.Instead of the other way around. And the trainers as well who give the jockeys their riding instructions, or at the very least discuss tactics with them. Such as riding for the win, going for the place money, or even simply there to give the horse a run for another day.They also get regarded as idiots here.


I genuinely couldn't give a toss about Moore, to me racing is 90% jumps and 10% flat these days. While I have no opinion about the 2 you mention the Gold Cup was a shambles as far as Moore was concerned (and I backed the winner). Anyone who blamed the horse is just being purposely as blind as the TV pundits who refuse to see a bad ride. Moore had ridden way more bad big race rides since he's been at Coolmore than his supposed talent should allow. Its impossible to not win big races with the ammunition he gets but he should have a lot more. The great jockeys down the years have always ridden winners where I'd say only he would have won on that, I've never seen a race where I've said that about Moore. Not his fault of course that the general standard of flat jockey is the worst ever, indeed he was born at the right time as far as he is concerned, as in plenty of previous generations he'd be lucky to be on a 3rd string. Anyway this rubbish is nearly done for another year and we can soon get back to the proper racing :)

By:
MJK
When: 24 Jun 17 22:41
Ps, all the jockeys and trainers now say the tactics are left up to the jockey so the wrong instructions angle is rubbish.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 24 Jun 17 23:08
Ps, all the jockeys and trainers now say the tactics are left up to the jockey so the wrong instructions angle is rubbish

They also tell us that every horse in the race is trying to win.

I bet you believed Fallon as well, after Tommo had said in court under oath that Fallon had told him the trainer had told him not to win on Top Cees?

I also don't care much for your opinion on reading races if you think that it was the ride that cost them the Gold Cup.
By:
chavman
When: 24 Jun 17 23:10
im no jockey basher,and ive won a good few quid off RM in my time,but he did seem to leave alot of horses with too much to do this week.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 24 Jun 17 23:13
PS, who do you think tells the jockey to give the horse an easy run?

Does the jockey decide that himself?

''Sorry guv I thought he had a hard race last time so I decided to give him an easy run this time.
What you and the owner had ten grand apiece on him? Oh sorry about that.''
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 24 Jun 17 23:24
kipling
     22 Jun 17 17:36   
Most of you guys would be better studying the horses attitude and forget the jockeys.

Absolutely right Howard. No doubt the horse dodged it and hung in towards the winner. Everyone would have known that in the old days on Betfair. 

A couple of good posts there.

Sums up too many on here unfortunately.
By:
henryluca
When: 25 Jun 17 01:10
Doubt whether any result would have been too different with different tactics----many punters put their expectations of a horse before the horses's true ability within the contest of the race--Big O is a world class horse and on the day doubt if any other horse would have passed it.

Was a great carnival spectacle
Page 4 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com