briggs al post u the cassino system u will win around 70 %  ave every time that wheel spins you will win a quid ,  dont have time to explain most dont have the knowledge to grasp complicated systems
yes i agree ANDREW I THROW CAUSION TO THE WIND ON THE ENGLAND GAME AFTER THE CHANGES BUT IRELAND TORE THEM APART AND SHOULD HAVE SCORED AT LEAST 4 A POOR ENGLAND SHOULD HAVE BEAT THEM BUT SCORING IS A MAJOR PROB WITH THEM SIMILAR TO PORTUGAL

sageform
Date Joined:    15 Jun 01
Blogger: sageform's blog
Add contact | Send message
21 Jun 16 07:01
Plenty of people willing to criticize and some helpful advice mixed in. I take the point about odds on the toss of a coin but the big difference is that we have no reliable measure of value on horse racing

The point is that if you know what you are doing and trust your own pricing/judgement you will have a price of a horse in mind (or anything you are punting on). If it is higher than what you expected you bet it. The point that mart is saying "you won't find 5 naps in a day" is pointless. It is irrelevant if it wins or loses on the day, the point is you bet prices not necessarily what you think will win. If you are betting the value day in, day out (no matter how many times) you will win longterm. The toss of a coin was a simple analogy of betting the right prices will put you in profit longterm.

England last night approx were 10/11, Slovakia 5/1, draw 11/4. I thought England would win but at odds on I wouldn't bet them as had them at around 5/4 myself. If England were 6/4 or bigger I would have had a fair bet on, if Slovakia were 10/1 I would have bet them. The point I am making is Mart does not care about value/price/bank management etc which in turn will lead you to the poorhouse. He has already stated "england was not the best choice far too many changes from last game rarely works", so why even strike a bet at a massively shorter price than at kick off and use 66% of your bank?? It's clueless mug punting at its finest, and shows exactly why he can get as much on as he wants online with the bookies.

ANDREW I THROW CAUSION TO THE WIND ON THE ENGLAND GAME AFTER THE CHANGES BUT IRELAND TORE THEM APART AND SHOULD HAVE SCORED AT LEAST 4 A POOR ENGLAND SHOULD HAVE BEAT THEM BUT SCORING IS A MAJOR PROB WITH THEM SIMILAR TO PORTUGAL Again why bet them, just having a stab at a stupid price, knowing England struggle to score already (everyone knows that), and I would like to know how Ireland tore them apart? When did Ireland play them??

As for having a roulette system - get a grip, you will never beat the maths of a roulette wheel whatever you tell yourself. If you could you would be in Vegas on unlimited stakes hitting every casino, but you choose to go to work everyday.

bigmart    21 Jun 16 07:24 


as delta said long time ago a lost cause and very bitter man , venting his anger on others big prob of his , very sad !




Not a chance on earth that delta posted such a comment, you should refrain from drawing others into your squabbles mart.

saddo - it's pretty obvious delta never said that, but Mart throws other names and accusations around like confetti (how many on here are 10p lucky15 punters, jobless, homeless, clueless, scroungers according to him)? He seems to think it means he is popular if someone has the same belief imo - even if that said person hasn't even said it.

not half as bad as laughing at someone with cancer or pretending to have it WAC

magic it seams to be a common occurrence on here some one says something it must be fact them clif jumpers latch on again i will say it delta stated he was a lost cause , i want repeat exactly because it was personal , but it seems to have made him a very very very bitter person , stop guessing until u know facts tar ! i stated a long time ago after i took a break and came back i cd not believe facts was the same person , thats when delts posted he was a lost cause and bitter !

Stfu ydc

NOT PART OF THE THREAD BUT THINK     HERMARNA  7.40 LEIC SHOULD WIN 100/30

the under 2.5 have cleaned up in this comp and lots games draw ht to boot

magic you might pic out 5 h/cap good things but the chances that they will all run to form on the same day not getting into trouble is rather slim , law of average says one or 2 will meet trouble
alas my thearie if u do one or 2 horses higher stakes ie say your bank is £100
you bet 5 x £20 bets at 3s chances u need 3 winners in one day to make it work or you wd be better backing a 4/6 shot
or stick £100 on the 3s or have 2x £50 bets on either occasion my system makes a profit with 1 winner
thats why its better than your five a day   its exactly the same with footie
do 3 teams if you do 5 bet the guy who does 3 will win more , its my own own opinion and i am convinced it right

But you backed england last night at 4/6

Mart, repeating an untruth doesn't make it true, delta never said that, why not ask him to confirm.

Give up Magic he will do anything to avoid answering you with reasoning.

that was a bit fun apart from the trols , have to say i was very unlucky with the draw
spain will play italy bet they did not want that , the pen was a joke but hey its footy
least i have the bottle to put up a thread something that the negative posters want do
its good to debate on a forum , but take a look at some of the posters and look at the threads they have created making this place better , ''what threads i here you cry '' exactly my hole point
this place used to top class now the trols out way the good guys , can you imagine a forum full of irish are luckys and dopeys on it  , you wd be hitting the refresh button looking for posts , they wd have nobody or nothing to talk about then wd they ,

were you not lucky with the draw the other day when france hit the woodwork 3 times, swings and roundabouts mart

At least these aint real bets

busy day ahead for me tomorrow but i like     LIFE LESS ORDINARY 7.50 kemp
a good judge on here likes the fav bar stool  so its a f/c for me be lucky

did i here some one speak , must have been my imagination

let me see you say i don't place bets , i don't even work according to some !
and i don't have a system for the cassino ! right ok you must all me right them

keep up the guessing but you want find any answers , ever  see on tv these guys wd get asked to leave
cassinos as their luck seams very good    be my guest trol away

Still no reply to the points in bold Mart. Apart from the 6/4 on England, I never said I was getting 6/4. I said I had them priced up at 5/4 so I would want bigger to bet them, that's all.

Anyway back to the post:

The point is that if you know what you are doing and trust your own pricing/judgement you will have a price of a horse in mind (or anything you are punting on). If it is higher than what you expected you bet it. The point that mart is saying "you won't find 5 naps in a day" is pointless. It is irrelevant if it wins or loses on the day, the point is you bet prices not necessarily what you think will win. If you are betting the value day in, day out (no matter how many times) you will win longterm. The toss of a coin was a simple analogy of betting the right prices will put you in profit longterm.

England last night approx were 10/11, Slovakia 5/1, draw 11/4. I thought England would win but at odds on I wouldn't bet them as had them at around 5/4 myself. If England were 6/4 or bigger I would have had a fair bet on, if Slovakia were 10/1 I would have bet them. The point I am making is Mart does not care about value/price/bank management etc which in turn will lead you to the poorhouse. He has already stated "england was not the best choice far too many changes from last game rarely works", so why even strike a bet at a massively shorter price than at kick off and use 66% of your bank?? It's clueless mug punting at its finest, and shows exactly why he can get as much on as he wants online with the bookies.

ANDREW I THROW CAUSION TO THE WIND ON THE ENGLAND GAME AFTER THE CHANGES BUT IRELAND TORE THEM APART AND SHOULD HAVE SCORED AT LEAST 4 A POOR ENGLAND SHOULD HAVE BEAT THEM BUT SCORING IS A MAJOR PROB WITH THEM SIMILAR TO PORTUGAL Again why bet them, just having a stab at a stupid price, knowing England struggle to score already (everyone knows that), and I would like to know how Ireland tore them apart? When did Ireland play them??

As for having a roulette system - get a grip, you will never beat the maths of a roulette wheel whatever you tell yourself. If you could you would be in Vegas on unlimited stakes hitting every casino, but you choose to go to work everyday.


So any comments Mart? Reasoned ones, don't lose your rag, just answer them please.