Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 587 comments are related to the topic:
REVENGE OF THE PINK PANTHER

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 7 of 15  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 587
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:28
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 04:35
The second bug found that distorted runner number 3 in all race cards to as at least

half its actual chance would explain why in smaller field size meetings like the reduced

AW fields in April, I had such poor results as when the field size was on average

as low as 6, then one in six selections where missed out in favor of other horses

and in handicap races alot of the winners come for the top half of the card so this

would of compounded the problem, but bug number one was much worse and I cant believe

that so many of my workbooks still appear profitable considering they formulas are

screwed up!
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 04:40
Thanks gandalf but I already am aware of the mistakes and the corrections have now taken

place and your comments have been very useful apart from the spiteful ones but I understand no one is perfect.



I suggest you make yourself as comfortable as possible in the coming weeks because

its going to be very interesting indeed and the panther looks like he has a new set of claws

good night and sweet winning dreams...Wink
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 04:40
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.



NO MATTER HOW UNWELL, MEDICATED AND DELUSIONAL YOU ARE, THE TRUTH AND THE FIGURES DON'T LIE!!!!!!
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 04:42
mind you I just have to see what I would of achieved at the jumps races

after I update the book before I go to bedCool
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 04:49

The racing post tissue favs only won 6 races out of 6 meetings yesterday so I expect

both the Industry and the editors of the racing post also to be taking your prescribed

drugs treatments, only they know what they are doing by posting such rubbish everyday

and I think you know also Gandalf that the bookmaking game is a shoddy screwed up show

that reflects nothing about real chances and odds.



it is hoped that layers get kicked into touch pretty soon and I intend to help that happen

as such poor mark ups need the panthers revenge treatment

By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 05:08
42 races today, all covered by the fantasist with 74 selections/darts thrown, 76 originally, 2 non runners.

64 lost, 10 won.

Losses Forward : Minus £186.49

Losses Today : Minus £22.47 or 30.37% of stakes from 74 bets.

Losses To date : Minus £208.96

At a reasonable £10 per bet, that's £2,089 down in 3.5 weeks around £600 a week and remember he's throwing 2 darts in 6,7,8 runner races and giving himself from a 25% to 33% chance of finding the winner and still not finding the winner. In fact if it wasn't for short priced/odds on favs winning for him, he'd be in a Black Hole. Clueless.
By:
genelec
When: 25 Apr 13 06:24
[size= 20pt][color =red]

"The paper over the cracks"  news....

I will never get better, as I have discovered the reason why the mdma
I was taking during the "beat the books campaign thread" was failing badly!

2 major bugs have been found

bug 1
I'm totally clueless

bug 2
I'm completely deluded


[/color][/size]
By:
big aitch
When: 25 Apr 13 07:44
gandalf, please stop posting things 20 times, once is more than enough
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 25 Apr 13 09:32
runner number 3 in all my mdpm outputs was distorted due to having a redundant
formula in the associated cell, this has been fixed and it might be the reason
why sprinter sacre appeared to have less chance in the recent clash with
sanctuire...


Does your bullsh*t know no ends?

Sprinter Sacre was number 5 at Cheltenham.
By:
daza40
When: 25 Apr 13 09:34
so basically the pink panther selections were all b o ll ox and now your starting  ANOTHER set of selections with different filters,so technically its another thread..do we all now just discard the minus 180 + losses from the pink panther thread?? right ok so lets say we do that and start afresh with these NEW selections,how long is it gonna be before you come up with more lies when these fail ??? I wonder hmmmmmm,id say a week tops!! good luck rampton
By:
daza40
When: 25 Apr 13 09:46
I seriously cant believe I still keep posting on bfs threads ,its like an obcession of mine to see him fail,but im not like that, I love to see people beat the books that's what were all here for after all..so I do wish him the best in the quest for the elusive golden chalice,but I despise his arrogance and im holyier than thou attitude.i suppose that's what turns me against his views, apart from the fact he knows f u c k all about horses ! so im gonna restrain myself from getting involved in his delusional threads and leave the freak be..as we all know IT AINT NEVER GONNA HAPPEN BF,im just gonna concentrate on my own wins/losses as I find that is where I excel in my own field..only myself to blame when I have a bad run which I can live with,dont have to blame a computer or filter x,y,or z...so good luck rampton,im outa here......LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 25 Apr 13 10:11
Come on daza, you can't leave us, your posts to him make me absolutely p*ss Laugh
By:
daza40
When: 25 Apr 13 10:21
I know dr g but I think I go over the top a bit sometimesLaugh
By:
bannahan
When: 25 Apr 13 10:25
The world is passing the Op by, I wonder on his death bed if he'll wish he hadn't wasted such monumental amounts of time on what can only be described as an impossible task.

Today should be glorious, I doubt he'll see an ounce of sunshine.
By:
Pinza
When: 25 Apr 13 11:53
I'm out of this
Over 200 posts in two days and none of them much sense!
Takes too long to read through
Some people must have a lot of spare time on their hands.

The "ANGRY" ones (you should know who you are - and if you can't recognise yorselves there's little hope for you) should chill out and move on.

BF-F; You have tried, but apart from some good days the experiment has failed (as far as winners concerned) - but the publicity you have created
for youself rates you higher than the G4S Olympic security debacle.

There is little chance a set pattern of ratings alone can consistently supply regular winners in ALL the types of racing (Hurdles,Jumps,Bumpers, Flat racing, AW racing, Irish racing etc) and the different tracks, race grades and distances.

Each should be treated as a separate entity, and also take into account the Trainers and their preferences plus previous race stats.
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 12:13
Dear Sir Frank Whittle.

Our recent visit to your exhibition of your new jet engine didn't go well

and we have decided in our wisdom that their is no future for the jet

engine and cant see it being of any use in a combat zone.

yours faithfully the war ministry 1929( almost ten years ahead of the competition)


Yeah Pinza, Gandalf, dazza you have all made your point that you can observe when

things go wrong for reasons that can be explained so hopefully you will all leave my thread

and let this set of dimensional measurements do its thing today for the first time without

massive bugs present(and a few emotional blood suckers present here)Wink.
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 25 Apr 13 12:31
runner number 3 in all my mdpm outputs was distorted due to having a redundant
formula in the associated cell, this has been fixed and it might be the reason
why sprinter sacre appeared to have less chance in the recent clash with
sanctuire...


How is the above relevant please when Sprinter Sacre wore number 5?
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 12:31
fantasist, you are only enforcing everything that people say about you, just look at your latest attempt at deception, you blatently aftertime/turn an actual loss of £23 on 74 bets yesterday into an imagined £47 profit, it's obvious when you've just taken your meds, your manner of writing and the nonsensical nature of it, makes it so obvious, you speed up and are incoherent and gradually as they kick in, you calm down, as to your invented "bugs", consider it added to the growing list of your invented excuses, all devised by a delusioned mind that can't handle the reality that you have failed from the very first day with this utter tripe, that you stated from the outset was going to make you "riches" through it's sale.
By:
holywell
When: 25 Apr 13 12:50
bff,

You will never gain financially from selling your ratings. There are of course some individuals who can't help themselves if someone who can string a sentence together is telling them they can improve their financial situation. I'm afraid there won't be enough of these people to make it worth your while.

There has been some good advice from posters on this thread, generally telling you to move on, you should take their advice.
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 13:02
I am not selling this, its all mine pal...


The new MDPM with 2 major bugs removed would of made a small profit this last

2 days and just tested it at my Cheltenham workbook and top 2 went through the card

on one fairly recent days racing....

A meeting at Cheltenham
    12:10 »  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Far West         62        1         1.25        1.04   
    Handazan         28        2         -1        -1   
                                       
     12:45 »  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Highland Lodge         52        1         3.2        1.58   
    Best Served Cold         18        5         -1        -1   
                                       
    1:20 »  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Oh Crick         58        7        -1        -1   
    Shooters Wood         34        1        3.8        1.51   
                                       
     1:55 »  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Ardkilly Witness         56        7         -1        -1   
    Coneygree         25        1         2.08        1.31   
                                       
    2:30 »  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Unioniste         35        1        9.71        2.9   
    Cristal Bonus         26        12        -1        -1   
                                       
    3:05 »  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Zarkandar         6        1         2.17        1.32   
                                       
                                       
    3:40  Cheltenham         points        Result        Pl/s        place   
    Oscar Whisky         62        1         1.24        1.05   
    Crack Away Jack         38        2         -1        -1   
                                       
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 13:03
the Zarkander race has only one runner in it as the other was up a stone recently and these are now removed...
By:
Captain Christy
When: 25 Apr 13 13:10
If you aren't looking to sell it I would suggest keep this particular gold-mine of information to yourself instead of spamming up the forum.
By:
holywell
When: 25 Apr 13 13:14
bff,

Why are you wasting your time on here if your plan wasn't to gain financially ? You don't bet yourself so why are you spending so much time producing and posting these ratings which are proven to be worthless ?
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 25 Apr 13 13:24
bf_fananatic
23 Apr 13 18:58

To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven
over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment
with its limited resources.


Two days later - "MDPM" is back.
By:
genelec
When: 25 Apr 13 13:53
By:
ebulGery
When: 25 Apr 13 14:01
Laugh
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 25 Apr 13 14:07


2 huge errors have been discovered in the previous MDPM
based "beat the books" thread , these have been now fixed
and passed with flying colours.

the current topspeed has now been dropped and MDPM reinstated
as the thread system, observe the difference as all
new ratings will be published in red for danger
and interpret that how you feel best...







Berverley

2:05 »      Tatlisu     60
2:05 »      Dream Vale     70

2:35 »      Cinderslipper     73
2:35 »      Emperatriz     31

3:05 »      Talqaa     35
3:05 »      Asgardella     77

Woverhanpton

2:25 »      Lilo Lil     59
2:55 »      Jake The Snake     78
2:55 »      Waterloo Dock     34


Perth

2:15 »      Looking On     48
2:45 »      King's Chorister     47


By:
holywell
When: 25 Apr 13 14:10
Do you think shouting at forumites will help you, whats all this bold and red text about ?
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 14:10
2 darts thrown in a 5 runner race, 40% chance of a winner, you've guessed it, WINNER NOT FOUND.

Looks like the imagined bugs in order to deceive, are still in your head.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 14:13
Things can only get better, afterall he's throwing 2 darts at a 4 horse race(ROFL), a 50% chance of a winner.
By:
GandalfTheGrey
When: 25 Apr 13 14:13
^ in the 2.55
Page 7 of 15  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ... | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com