|
By:
I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost
identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. Not even a day into your new sh1te and already you're lying. let's put up the real picture. Losses Forward : Minus £159.85 Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 [ This image is no longer available. ] |
|
By:
I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost
identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. Not even a day into your new sh1te and already you're lying. let's put up the real picture. Losses Forward : Minus £159.85 Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 [ This image is no longer available. ] |
|
By:
I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost
identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. Not even a day into your new sh1te and already you're lying. let's put up the real picture. Losses Forward : Minus £159.85 Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 [ This image is no longer available. ] |
|
By:
Carrying forward profits
![]() ![]() ![]() delusional , to the max |
|
By:
Firstly, take your meds, as your delusions are getting worse, you have no profits to carry forward, only losses on any of the multiple threads you start and then desert.
Secondly, you state on this thread that you will be recording at ISP. let me remind you again, of your words. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. 1....An exchange rate of betting is based on either a matched price or BSP as the Industry starting price is now firmly in the attic and used only by the tumble-weeds on the high streets or the highwaymen on the courses. All tipsters record at ISP or advised prices, you only record at BSP without Commission to attempt to reduce your already massive losses. You're the laughing stock of the forum, seen by all to be, from your own words, a raving, delusional. lying lunatic. |
|
By:
genelec 23 Apr 13 21:45 Joined: 08 Sep 11 | Topic/replies: 1,378 | Blogger: genelec's blog
The Pink Whanker strikes again don't forget to add last years figures into the mix P&L (5% Com) Runners May 21 -52.479 127 May 22 -24.835 79 May 23 31.544 130 May 24 54.2955 204 May 25 -62.4805 257 May 26 -10.2265 269 May 27 1.324 41 May 28 -31.46 189 May 29 -17.29 229 May 30 -1.13 192 Totals -112.7375 1511 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29130081/computer-ratings-for-all-the-racing-on-210512 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29131879/computer-ratings-for-22-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29133651/computer-ratings-for-23-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29135255/computer-ratings-for-24-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29137475/computer-winners-for-25-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29139571/computer-ratings-for-all-todays-hot-racing-action http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29141755/computer-ratings-for-the-curragh-27-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29143851 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29145925/computer-ratings-for-29-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29148219/computer-ratings-for-30-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29150315/todays-computer-ratings-for-this-afternoon http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29150901/computer-ratings-for-this-evenings-races-31-05-12 |
|
By:
Let's not forget the Blue Halo / X Factor losses
Day 1 - Selections 18 - Loss - 27.20% - £4.90 Day 2 - Selections 18 - Loss - 80.55% - £14.50 Day 3 - Selections 16 - Loss - 65.73% - £10.52 Day 4 - Selections 30 - Loss - 29.01% - £8.70 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29601523/blue-halo-profossional-series-of-racing-tips-thread-1-26-12-12?post_id=527512869#527512869 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29601523/blue-halo-profossional-series-of-racing-tips-thread-1-26-12-12?post_id=527512869#527512869 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29603993/blue-halo-professional-series-of-racing-tips-thread-3-28-12-12?post_id=527546751#527546751 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29605353/x-factor-professional-series-of-racing-tips-thread-4-29-12-12?origpost_id=527570669&pg=2 |
|
By:
This is our computer expert.
Help needed please on importing tables into thread? bf_fananatic 05 Apr 12 20:38 Joined: 17 Jul 11 | Topic/replies: 12,558 | Blogger: bf_fananatic's blog I have seen some posters that have displayed data in a table format that is very neat and impressive but I cant work out how this is done? |
|
By:
Maybe it's time Betfair acted for bf's own good and banned him from posting this nonsense.
It's good to see people posting their selections on here with a write-up and p/l (i.e. the robster), but, it is clear after a long period of time that bf is either taking the p*** or he has issues. |
|
By:
I didn't think Betfair allowed scammers on this site and usually their threads are swiftly deleted, surely they have to relieve us of the pain from this idiot and he can go and do his worst on twitter or some such.
|
|
By:
2....The threads profit and loss is not connected to other threads profit and loss nor others accounting as it would be wrong for me to carry profits over also to a new thread and I have indeed not carried any profit and loss from other threads associated with different systems.
If you ever made a profit, you wouldn't ever start a new thread. You only start a new thread when your losses have got so hilarious that you can't take any more and need to try and ignore them. HTH |
|
By:
BFF is indeed the "Ostrich" of the Forum (buries his head in the sand and hopes his worries will go away).
As has been pointed out by many,the only reason he has started yet another thread is because he knows he can never get back to profits. Anybody backing his selections to a modest £100 per point would have been down £16,000 in just a month. "Let's have some fun" hardly seems the correct description for that,does it. I can just about suffer idiots but,I draw the line at liars and you,BFF are exactly that. Incidentally,I can see no mention of Place betting in your advice. A simple P&L every day whether good or bad is the only way to go. No sign of your P&L for yesterday yet. Never mind,I will ensure that there is one every day. Current thread loss is MINUS 159.85 Points C/F plus yesterday's LossMINUS 19.64 Points. Total = MINUS 179.49 to prices at ISP. |
|
By:
"results and running profit or loss will be displayed in better exchange BSP and ISP and both should show a positive yield."
They do show positive results.They are,you are doing your "orchestras",BFF on whatever thread you post your utter garbage on. |
|
By:
I hear the beginning of a 10 count....
|
|
By:
Anyone know what MDPM relates to?
Month, Distance, Placed, Money earned, ? |
|
By:
Mad,deranged,pea brained,mongrel?????
|
|
By:
Multi Dimensional Prediction Modelling.
Seriously. |
|
By:
Losses Forward : Minus £159.85
Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 |
|
By:
I am trying hard not to laugh at some of your comments as they are quite creative
and humorous so well done ![]() Not so sure that its fair to bring losses on show in this thread while at the same time not showing the profits from other threads that simply wiped out all the above losses completely? Recent Chelts festival 60 plus points Almanac for 3 weekends made 150 points profit after making 50 points profit last year I predicted that I would make 100 points in one day and it took 4 days only to achieve. achieved the record in the recent All Weather comp for most top finishes. And once again for gandalfs benefit who seems to have a lob sided unsymmetrical brain that allows for great narrative abilities(female profile) but extremely poor mathematical, Judgemental, logic and problem solving skills.and predictably can handle most office applications but couldn't program a teapot. Thread profit and loss 19 points. |
|
By:
bf, i thought you liked maths, you should know after .5 you should be rounding up......not down as you have convenieantly done, and no doubt you would round up if it was proffit, and having said that you dont state whether it was a profit or a loss.
you are a disgusting individual, of which there is many on this forum, but you top the lot |
|
By:
At least that is a start BFF.
Keep posting them every day and I will not constantly bring up the MINUS 159.85 Points from the previous thread. |
|
By:
how is a start, when he doesnt state whether its profit or loss?? ffs
![]() |
|
By:
taipan501
24 Apr 13 11:27 Joined: 09 Aug 11 | Topic/replies: 5,861 | Blogger: taipan501's blog how is a start, when he doesnt state whether its profit or loss?? ffs I have clearly dispplayed the profit and loss for yesterday in this thread at the time in bold below and forgive me for not having the time to update constantly everything on the thread that is constantly polluted with non-sense and mischief bf_fananatic 24 Apr 13 01:10 Joined: 17 Jul 11 | Topic/replies: 12,560 | Blogger: bf_fananatic's blog |
|
By:
not having the time BFF...........then why post this at 11:16
Thread profit and loss 19 points. |
|
By:
and why dont you just make things easier on yourself and say "these are lays", cos if your as bad as they say, you'd be a great layer
![]() |
|
By:
Not so sure that its fair to bring losses on show in this thread while at the same time not showing the profits from other threads that simply wiped out all the above losses completely?
The compulsive liar is at it again. |
|
By:
that is constantly polluted with non-sense and mischief
You started it. |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Losses Forward : Minus £159.85
Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 |
|
By:
More updates later Catterick 1:35 » Eastlands Lad 89 1:35 » Thrust Control 127 2:05 » Mr Mo Jo 57 2:05 » Novalist 78 2:35 » Alexandrakollontai 78 2:35 » Panama Cat 101 3:10 » Moe's Place 63 3:10 » Nurpur 174 3:40 » Alta Lilea 181 4:15 » Perfect Words 149 4:15 » Free Island 85 4:45 » Tinseltown 82 4:45 » Fine Kingdom 294 5:15 Surround Sound 112 5:15 Out Of The Blocks 123 Epsom Downs 2:20 » Sacrosanctus 139 2:20 » La Fortunata 47 2:50 » Perennial 77 2:50 » Novirak 105 3:20 » Hoarding 119 3:20 » Mirsaale 128 3:55 » King's Warrior 144 3:55 » Spifer 67 4:30 » Double Discount 103 4:30 » Legal Waves 188 5:00 Colmar Kid 80 5:00 Mumeyez 118 |
|
By:
Racingstar, he's been doing his new threads trick since day 1, can't handle his situation in life, needs to be seen as a success, has stated only recently that his aim is not to back but use his ratings for other purposes, i.e., to sell, he used the word riches actually, is very delusional (his actual illness), like the guy that throws the tax demand or any official letters requesting payment, into a drawer, if he can't see them, in his mind they don't exist, but then the day comes, when his world implodes, when the truth can't be ignored anymore, our friends world imploded a long time ago, failure after failure, now he is onto his next hope of escape, rate races and sell his tips, a foolproof, no risk (mugs will pay me) route to riches, remember when he first started, he was rating greyhounds, easier in his mind as only 6 runners, afterall, how hard could it be to pick the winner from 6 dogs, bang the stats for each into a computer and Hey Ho, I get the winner and I'll sell the tips.
That failed also, so he moves onto horses, his starting point is that he reads that favs win 30% of the time (roughly), so he picks 3 per race, advises to back between 4/1 and 33/1 (roughly), with two different price parameters for Flat and Jumps, ignoring favs, thinking that his picks at bigger prices will outweigh the races where the fav wins, all good and fine, but you've got to be able to pick winners regardless, that fails because he hasn't got a clue about the game, ignoring things that I'm not going to educate him, by mentioning them here, he then amends the price parameters for the two disciplines, recommends shorter priced and longer priced, to widen the net of opportunity, still failure and still clueless, look at what happens as soon as he has a loss, panic stations set in, then darts are just thrown, regardless of his price parameters, 50/1 shot picked today along with a 12/1 shot in the same race, where the fav was odds on and won, throwing two darts in a maiden race, where the first time outs outnumber the runners with a race behind them, backing in every race, everyday, hoping and praying to land winners, he would need a winning run of months just to recoup his cumulative losses to date. Then there's the daily obnoxious side, I'm superior to all of you when asked a civil question, his deluded mind again, yet when somebody who comes onto the thread for the first time and posts something nice, he is all over them, they're a potential customer in his eyes, on the other thread Tightfisted posted stuff in his favour, but fantasist misread it and tore into Tightfisted, then when he realised his mistake, he was all over Tightfisted. Everyday he shows how ill he really is, tell tale signs he thinks nobody sees, because "he's superior and cleverer than us plebs". Why do you think he posts his selections in big highlighted letters with huge gaps between races and as he adds a meeting each time he includes the meetings already posted, two reasons, firstly, it's a look at me trait and secondly and more sinister, is because the more drawn out his post is, the quicker the truth that people post about his actual losses preceding his post, will disappear, as his elongated post will get a new page on the thread opened quicker, also it's the throwing the request for payment envelopes into the drawer syndrome again, if he can't see the criticism, then it doesn't exist and he doesn't have to deal with it. He's a scammer, nothing more, nothing less. |
|
By:
More updates later Catterick 1:35 » Eastlands Lad 89 1:35 » Thrust Control 127 2:05 » Mr Mo Jo 57 2:05 » Novalist 78 2:35 » Alexandrakollontai 78 2:35 » Panama Cat 101 3:10 » Moe's Place 63 3:10 » Nurpur 174 3:40 » Alta Lilea 181 4:15 » Perfect Words 149 4:15 » Free Island 85 4:45 » Tinseltown 82 4:45 » Fine Kingdom 294 5:15 Surround Sound 112 5:15 Out Of The Blocks 123 Epsom Downs 2:20 » Sacrosanctus 139 2:20 » La Fortunata 47 2:50 » Perennial 77 2:50 » Novirak 105 3:20 » Hoarding 119 3:20 » Mirsaale 128 3:55 » King's Warrior 144 3:55 » Spifer 67 4:30 » Double Discount 103 4:30 » Legal Waves 188 5:00 Colmar Kid 80 5:00 Mumeyez 118 |
|
By:
We got them the first time bff, ta.
|
|
By:
Gandalf fails on the most basic law concerning betting
you will never profit from backing favourites and though I dont recommend betting out outsiders either only a fool would imagine that the profit hasn't been scalped from runners that are touted at sub 4/1 on the flat and sub 3/1 on the NH as your are expecting to hit Strike rates of say 25% and 27% respectively to arrive at poor points profit per unit staked . Any fool can find a winner but few make a profit and I have found this out and will admit the game is hard! |
|
By:
Racingstar, he's been doing his new threads trick since day 1, can't handle his situation in life, needs to be seen as a success, has stated only recently that his aim is not to back but use his ratings for other purposes, i.e., to sell, he used the word riches actually, is very delusional (his actual illness), like the guy that throws the tax demand or any official letters requesting payment, into a drawer, if he can't see them, in his mind they don't exist, but then the day comes, when his world implodes, when the truth can't be ignored anymore, our friends world imploded a long time ago, failure after failure, now he is onto his next hope of escape, rate races and sell his tips, a foolproof, no risk (mugs will pay me) route to riches, remember when he first started, he was rating greyhounds, easier in his mind as only 6 runners, afterall, how hard could it be to pick the winner from 6 dogs, bang the stats for each into a computer and Hey Ho, I get the winner and I'll sell the tips.
That failed also, so he moves onto horses, his starting point is that he reads that favs win 30% of the time (roughly), so he picks 3 per race, advises to back between 4/1 and 33/1 (roughly), with two different price parameters for Flat and Jumps, ignoring favs, thinking that his picks at bigger prices will outweigh the races where the fav wins, all good and fine, but you've got to be able to pick winners regardless, that fails because he hasn't got a clue about the game, ignoring things that I'm not going to educate him, by mentioning them here, he then amends the price parameters for the two disciplines, recommends shorter priced and longer priced, to widen the net of opportunity, still failure and still clueless, look at what happens as soon as he has a loss, panic stations set in, then darts are just thrown, regardless of his price parameters, 50/1 shot picked today along with a 12/1 shot in the same race, where the fav was odds on and won, throwing two darts in a maiden race, where the first time outs outnumber the runners with a race behind them, backing in every race, everyday, hoping and praying to land winners, he would need a winning run of months just to recoup his cumulative losses to date. Then there's the daily obnoxious side, I'm superior to all of you when asked a civil question, his deluded mind again, yet when somebody who comes onto the thread for the first time and posts something nice, he is all over them, they're a potential customer in his eyes, on the other thread Tightfisted posted stuff in his favour, but fantasist misread it and tore into Tightfisted, then when he realised his mistake, he was all over Tightfisted. Everyday he shows how ill he really is, tell tale signs he thinks nobody sees, because "he's superior and cleverer than us plebs". Why do you think he posts his selections in big highlighted letters with huge gaps between races and as he adds a meeting each time he includes the meetings already posted, two reasons, firstly, it's a look at me trait and secondly and more sinister, is because the more drawn out his post is, the quicker the truth that people post about his actual losses preceding his post, will disappear, as his elongated post will get a new page on the thread opened quicker, also it's the throwing the request for payment envelopes into the drawer syndrome again, if he can't see the criticism, then it doesn't exist and he doesn't have to deal with it. He's a scammer, nothing more, nothing less. Can read him like a book. |
|
By:
your a ****
|
|
By:
so anyone that uses ratings and shares them freely is a scammer gandalf?
I haven't worked you out yet Gandalf but I have my suspicions and I presume anyone else can work it out also! |
|
By:
You're imo.
|
|
By:
stick that up your nefarious backside Gandalf as you are a poor judge of intelligence pal 1:35 » Eastlands Lad 89 3rd at 30 bsp 1:35 » Thrust Control 127 winner at 6.13 |
|
By:
you will never profit from backing favourites
So why do you constantly use favourites not winning as an excuse for your poor performance then? |