There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 587 comments are related to the topic:
REVENGE OF THE PINK PANTHER
REVENGE OF THE PINK PANTHER
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 587
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
To explain the huge difference between the last thread "The pink panther beat the books"
and this new thread the old thread used a system called MDPM which has not been proven over the long run and is too complex to evolve within a limited excel environment with its limited resources. I then decided to look into adding 2 powerful form line evaluation processes to arrive at by early indications, a much better and accurate evaluation of the last 6 races for each runner in a race which is the new ratings system for this new thread. Also I am manually filtering prices to avoid following selections that are too short in the market and more-likely to be non profitable. I am now also able to keep all Flat and NH races in 2 seperate workbooks with almost identical settings which keeps everything synchronised and easy to port out results every evening which will be in BSP listing and with an Industry total to compare how much better BSP is compared to the poor returning ISP. I hope everyone finds this new thread interesting and profitable... Yours numerically the Pink Panther | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
nothing to see here....
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Total krapp from the fantasist, another attempt at a smokescreen.
He's throwing darts, two at a time at each race, then praying for a result. Nothing has changed sinced March 2012, just had a look back at every thread, all LOSING, then he ups sticks and starts a new thread. At one stage last year he was putting up 4 selections per race, yes 4 and still lost!!! Lies, lies, lies, that's his modus operandi. I'll say it again, we are dealing with a guy with serious problems. £28.00 down so far from £64.00 staked as I write. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Shanelee1966
23 Apr 13 19:04 Joined: 30 Oct 03 | Topic/replies: 13,637 | Blogger: Shanelee1966's blog bff - a friend of mine compiled his own ratings for years, he was far better on the flat & AW. He always said the jumps was something he couldn`t get an edge with. He started on the 1st May and ran until early October (flat) 1st November until end of March AW. They were essentially speed ratings which if I remember correctly were then adjusted into a handicap rating. I know he developed a set of average times, well over 50 to cover the obvious variables. It took him 3/4 years altogether and I along with 2 others used them regularly. He always said it`s best not to overcomplicate. Fascinating post Shanlee1966, I is so easy to over complicate ratings until you lose an edge by either diffusion of accuracy or devaluing your average returned price and I can well understand that it took so long as it really is a seasonal game and a very complex set of principles to master.I am only a novice and its really just a hobby and I have come to realise that it takes a lot of expiereince to understand all matters that are involved with racing horses over differing courses, conditions and throughout the changing racing seasons. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
lol above post
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Sounds over complicated to me
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
might invest in trainers flat statistics 2013 book 17.99 not convinced it will aid my betting.
possible could end up complicating my simple system of reading the form. goodluck bf fanatic. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
if your manually filtering prices why is sprinter sacre in the mix then? f u k in ejoot
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
well come back in another 2 years when you've sussed it then bf,as its took you 2 alredy and your still a flop.i honestly don't know any tipsters so bad ,in fact id say your a fukin d I ck head
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Losses Forward : Minus £159.85
Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
[ This image is no longer available. ]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
im only a poor little novice please take it easy on me, well the way you've been rambling on anyone would think you know what your on about!! well its so fukin obvious your a systematic guesser looking for the odd big price to keep your threads afloat FACT
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
go and bore someone who gives a f u c k
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
oh ffs
 he had this in plan from day 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
so clear this up.............are you the real pink panther or bffanantic?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
reminds me of a darts player in my local years ago who thought he was the best thing since eric bristow. i finally played half a dozen legs against him and battered him 6-0 one excuse followed another from the first game as he lost. and as kept losing the excuses got worse ending with him finally declaring the extractor fan was changing the flight of his arrows and there was no point playing unless the land lord switched it off , he was the biggest p1llock the world had ever seen , but compared to the fantasist he was a complete novice
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
GandalfTheGrey
23 Apr 13 20:10 Losses Forward : Minus £159.85 Losses Today : Minus £26.64 or 42.29% of stakes from 63 selections. Losses To date : Minus £186.49 New thread tomorrow gareee  | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
The Pink Whanker strikes again
don't forget to add last years figures into the mix
http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29130081/computer-ratings-for-all-the-racing-on-210512 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29131879/computer-ratings-for-22-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29133651/computer-ratings-for-23-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29135255/computer-ratings-for-24-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29137475/computer-winners-for-25-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29139571/computer-ratings-for-all-todays-hot-racing-action http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29141755/computer-ratings-for-the-curragh-27-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29143851 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29145925/computer-ratings-for-29-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29148219/computer-ratings-for-30-05-12 http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29150315/todays-computer-ratings-for-this-afternoon http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/29150901/computer-ratings-for-this-evenings-races-31-05-12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
the 1st thing he needs to learn is keep his trap shut!! bragging b a s t ard when hes got nothing worth s h I t
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Let us be crystal clear here,there is but one reason that the certifiable BFF has created another thread.
An attempt to cover up the previous MINUS 159.85 Points. Today is exactly the same as before (sling plenty of arrows at the board. You are a despicable piece of excrement,BFF. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
I am only a novice and its really just a hobby and I have come to realise that it takes a lot of expiereince to understand all matters that are involved with racing horses
Well at least he has fessed up, but why torture us with this in the meantime? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Today.
61 selections. 9 winners.9/4,3/1,10/1,11/4,1/9,7/4,7/2,6/1,3/1. = Plus 32.36 Points MINUS 52 Losers = MINUS 19.64 Points Previous Thread Running Total= MINUS 159.85 Points Current Running Total = MINUS 179.49 Points. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Some classic Garee
 It is actually a matter of data modeling against the percieved values as created by the indusrty, other punters and odds compliers.The ratings I post are not filtered against the markets and I doubt I would post this as it would be too provocative so I will leave that to those that understand how to do this themselves.... I have not said I am brilliant so don't quite know how you have arrived at this presumption, i am an average guy that loves maths, computers, stats, predicting and numbers. don't praise me at all praise the mighty binary, decimal and other numeration systems or praise the inventors of the computer or Internet, or praise horses, trainers, jockeys and owners and the horse racing industry and the bookmakers and sporting exchanges, but don't praise me as I don't want praise, but I do want profit and this is what we all want There are selections and then there are Royal Selections made a correction to the system last night as I have noticed version 3.0 with new changes to improvement form types hasnt performed as well and when I checked it threw out bronze cannon a winner some time ago and others, found that a bug in excel had led to an interesting effect that had worked as a high pass filter which created a better returns strike, I have now cultivated this and modulated the effect as a function and it does provide better performance, today I am testing this out and its version 3.11 now the combined ratings are at some 55 points in loss but this could change any time and this test will continue till Sunday when a round up of both systems will be posted, also I shall be working on compiling the race data at night so that I can post at mid-day each day if you want to use them for general referencing of betting selections. For those interested the output I post is very raw and cosider these facts 1.....many maiden and three year old races would be thrown out of a betting program but have been posted. 2.....many non runners have not been deleted from charts and would bring in more winners via reserves being used. 3....you would not back short odds horses nor would I use races that have an odds on leading the ratings and drag in the other 2 to bet on, these have been posted! all three factors above stated have caused natural losses and the real figure of profit if engaged in a real betting progrm would be much smarter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
racingstar, you're figures are wrong, see above.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Gandalf,
I am astounded that the certifiable cretin still has the temerity to post on here. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
All was fine , bf would take on anyone who doubted him and baffle them with graphs and tweaks
BUT as soon as someone started doing the maths and a P/L the game was over , P/L doesn't lie | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
racing, I know, but the penny hasn't dropped with a lot of people, he genuinely is not well, sad but true, but it's just that he's so obnoxious, all comes down to what I said about him on the other thread, can't handle the truth, his illness leads to this.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
The "new thread" was the absolute giveaway,Gandalf.
What was the need? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
Keep on Pinking...
[ This image is no longer available. ] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
From genelec's figures he seemed to be getting worse as he goes along, I assume there must have been some after-timed jobs in there.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
He after-times whenever he gets the opportunity, which let's face it is every afternoon and evening
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
I don't get it at all, what's the point in all this?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
By:
(42)
|