PCstar     07 Jan 13 09:42 
I received a private message from MOTS this morning.
He will post here around the 20th January,a post that will
turn racing on it's head for the bookmakers.He has 100%
proof not only that 3 pound 65 and Ladcrookes worked together
but since he highlighted on here the scam they have changed their
policies to cover up their actions that bring their licencing under
dispute with regard to the gambling commission.He has legal matters
to sort as the leading nationals will run the story the day after it
appears on here.This is no different to fraudsters who have battered
betting shops for years and have received court orders not to enter
betting shops in England.Many before their hearing are entering betting shops
and acting in a normal and honest way to defend their cases when the date arrives.
MOTS has 96 horses that the caped crusaders have shortened before 6pm the night before
and drifted alarmingly the following morning and on betfair and ran a race that
had deemed stewards investigations,this from April 2012.


i love reading this, anymore nuggets lads?

Well done on the 150 race Spotty but no need to go cryptic mate there are
enough idiots on this forum:)

The genius strikes again,ladcrookes bow your cheating heads in shame.
Going 9/1 with others at 6 and 7 as Spotty said you went in first,laid
it for a monkey happy dayz

what happen to the big Friday supplement.  You talk **** #fact

I will be releasing a 126 page document to the press on the 28th of January 2013

A document concerning blatant pricing up of horses in 365 feature races
in twin mode withladdies with the intention of taking money from the consumer when they
have information that horses will not win.

My point is simple.

Why should jockeys and connections be held responsible for laying horses
on the exchanges to lose yet bookmakers who us these two races to lay
horses they have information that they will lose ?

People ask why would they base profit on two races ?

It is simple, why do 365 pick these two races a day ?

It is easier to 'cheat two races' it is obvious.

Creating 'false gambles' in Evening racing was the 'brainchild' of a
later sacked laddies employee.

I will purely list the horses on here, the details I will send to the
press will show times,market moves,exchange movements,the timing of their
prices between the two changed alarmingly when I first highlighted it on here.

When tipsters advertise in the Racing Post they have to 'proof read first' in
other words they have to prove they are successful first.

Betfair is my proof, the 'caped crusaders' have hung themselves with their
write up's er laddies write up's on oddschecker and their syncronised pricing
of the feature races.

Wouldnt go to the papers just yet :(

what price did they lay mubtadi at last night and this morning because they knew it wouldn't win?

Absolutely brilliant thread MOTS has my utmost respect although still haven't really fathomed out how to arrive at the selections to lay.

Corbieswood

Maybe I'm missing something but...

If these two are making it so fkn obvious which horses to lay, why aren't they all being laid like stink on here?

only 12 more sleeps until.......

I will be releasing a 126 page document to the press on the 28th of January 2013


Cant wait

11 more sleeps.....

9 more sleeps

not long til Monday now.... I'm so excited.   You'll look a right fool.  I really hope this happens and they print your name, possibly even a picture

Just a few things.
1) Have you added to your 126 pages
2) Which papers do you think will print that much literature - obviously it all relevant
3) Who will get done for liable 1st?  You or the paper.
$0 unfortuantly you haven't really backed everything up on here.  Therefore MOT as you aint posted on here much lately, I think its got a little out of hand.  I think you'll realise you're going to look a right p rick trying to prove your some super hero on here.

looks like a no show....

THE END!

You must not say anything untoward about, 'The Magic Sign'!

Big Brother is Watching You!

Trust me!