Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
theressomepratsonhere
07 May 12 20:32
Joined:
Date Joined: 22 May 05
| Topic/replies: 747 | Blogger: theressomepratsonhere's blog
are you all happy with biz at kempton bath windsor and bev today or was it dissapointing

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 112
By:
adge
When: 07 May 12 21:05
beverley was ok but nothing better than was expected [ no shortage of bookmakers ]

the results were a bigger problem
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 07 May 12 21:10
bath got the results they must still be counting it
By:
TopGun10
When: 07 May 12 21:14
Decent turn out of bookies at Bath, approx 15 in tatts, 8 on rails and about 5 in the centre of course, although centre of course looked very quiet in terms of punters.
By:
wasnot
When: 07 May 12 21:17
I did better at Warwick this year than last.
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 07 May 12 21:19
those who bet at newmarket sunday could have spent today counting it rather than going out in the rain
By:
wasnot
When: 07 May 12 21:28
Replaced the money done in on the Rowley Mile on Saturday theresome.
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 07 May 12 21:30
Surprised
By:
PACEY
When: 07 May 12 21:50
Bath trade very very poor, but not as bad as Fontwell on Friday, crowd down due to weather, at least 5 books left tatts before last today
By:
wasnot
When: 07 May 12 21:53
2 left from the front line (as well as several from the back lines) before the end at Newmarket on Sunday.  Business poor.
By:
ribero1
When: 07 May 12 22:29
the best meeting on this day by a distance was doncaster but when it closed for redevelopment arena transferred it to windsor and have since left it there and given doncaster yet another saturday night which is never well attended.
By:
ringlets
When: 08 May 12 00:23
The last two Saturdays at Doncaster have been very poorly attended,business looked to be pathetic at the last meeting.
By:
flash bookie
When: 08 May 12 07:41
beg to differ with the above comments r e n'market at the w'end i think adge will agree . 1094 tickets sat 769 sunday [sunday rained non stop from 315 onwards].biggest dissappointment at the w'end was to see adge burgling on the places 1/5th the odds on the 18 runner handicap !
By:
wasnot
When: 08 May 12 07:55
I'll guarantee that adge was bigger odds than those betting 1/4 odds and burgling on the win prices.
By:
flash bookie
When: 08 May 12 08:22
not sure about that what i can confirm is that on the said race i was CORRECT place terms and the place book was no where near overbroke [ 112%].anyway my above comments were tongue in cheek and don't want another row over place terms just feel the place terms are abused by certain bookies at times to my horror i learnt that several bookies were betting a 1/5th on the grand national surely that is indefensable for what it is worth i handed my gold flag back in and only EVER bet what i consider to be the correct place terms on every race i have ever bet on in my life .
By:
factmachine
When: 08 May 12 08:49
AS A RULE(BUT NOT IN ALL CASES)U WILL TEND TO FIND THE BOOKMAKERS(COMMISSION AGENTS)THAT DO NOT BET TO TRADITIONAL PLACE TERMS TEND TO HAVE BETFAIR UMBRELLAS ABOVE THEIR JOINTS(JUST HAVE A LOOK NEXT TIME YOUR OUT)THEN HAVE THE CHEEK TO COME ON THESE FORUMS TO COMPLAIN THAT THE TAKE IS DOWN,U COULDNT WRITE ITLaughLaughLaugh
By:
flash bookie
When: 08 May 12 08:57
factsmachine i tend to agree with your above post it belies belief to see bookies advertising the oppostion on their mush ! i was given a mush by this firm and the other exchange gave them both away which was a mistake cos they are now doing the rounds at all the tracks with my f****ng name on them !
By:
factmachine
When: 08 May 12 09:02
LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
flash bookie
When: 08 May 12 09:09
to top it up the latest betfair mush wudn't look out of place on a B&Q £3.99 patio set !
By:
TheNorfolkMafia
When: 08 May 12 09:27
"Anybody fancy a thick'un"
By:
adge
When: 08 May 12 10:34
i lost 1379 on that race , flash , including over 300 on places.

myself , geoff banks and others are currently attacking racing for change on their facebook page regarding the gold flag scheme ,demanding their action together with individual racecourses
on better publicity etc etc
i warned the beverley facebook friends about jack wilson yesterday but they took my [ and robert peaks ] postings down citing libel possibilities
By:
adge
When: 08 May 12 10:37
anyone else , punters especially , want to join that debate on facebook please do as it will ruffle their feathers better than sending letters
By:
wasnot
When: 08 May 12 10:50
Where do we post on facebook adge?
By:
adge
When: 08 May 12 11:03
you have to sign up , wasnot. at facebook .com
then add facebook "friends ". i find it quite useful as all the racecourses have pages you ask to become a friend with.
they always post news and up to the minute going reports, inspection news etc.
mind you , one or two could be "unfriending " me shortly
By:
flash bookie
When: 08 May 12 11:10
adge i think you know me well enough to know i am not having a pop at you , what makes my blood boil is the so called bookmakers who reguarly cheat/abuse the place terms. when there is no need to adjust the terms in there favour ! i handed my gold flag in when "our leaders had the terms altered to suit themselves" which i did not agree too !
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 08 May 12 11:27
thats nice wasnot acusing people who bet 1/4 1234 of burgling
By:
nineiron
When: 08 May 12 11:31
Bath pathetic left after 3
79 bets
Floor take on race 2 £24
Front line pitch
Bet next to 1/6th odd merchant
13/1 13/5 14/5 30/1 u name it

Stayed dry mind :)
By:
mmmalushka
When: 08 May 12 11:40
adge,i/5 the odds an 18 runner handicap? whether you won or lost there can be no excuse for betting to worse ew odds than traditional tattersal terms and then have the effrontery to critisise other books.
By:
adge
When: 08 May 12 11:48
i bet 1/5th on ALL handicaps of 16 to 21 runners which gives a freedom to offer bigger prices than betting offices.
that seems to work as the public like it.
all races 22 runners or more i bet to 1/4 odds
By:
wasnot
When: 08 May 12 11:49
Here we go again mmm.  20/1 @ 1/5th odds or 16/1 @ 1/4.  Which would you say was better value?
By:
mmmalushka
When: 08 May 12 12:05
Chief apologist wasnot signs in defending the very thing that scunners the punters.
By:
TheNorfolkMafia
When: 08 May 12 12:10
16/1 @ 1/4, every time!




















If you're a bookmaker!

Laugh
By:
nineiron
When: 08 May 12 12:10
Only 5/16 books in the first bet traditional terms
The fav unshipped on the way to the start
And looked a potential non runner

Reducing the runners from 8 down to 7

Are the 1/6 odds merchants obliged to still pay 3 places
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 08 May 12 12:48
bookmakers can do what they want in that situation nobody cares there are no morals anymore just look at the gr and the rc punishments it has become a farce just look at all these silly names popping up on bookmakers names we are a laughing stock very little honour or pride left
By:
barry dennis
When: 08 May 12 15:13
2 proposals for change september 2012, tattersalls pitches minimum 10K purchase price, daily pitch fee £500.

goodbye bank holiday & hobby bookmakers.
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 08 May 12 15:50
agree with half of what you say but not everybody who wants to go full time could get the backing others got anyway why does it bother you now you have retired
By:
IanP
When: 08 May 12 16:12
flash bookie, you'd need to bet to about 160% on the win book to achieve 112% on the place in an 18 runner hcap going 1/4, 1234 !!!
By:
adge
When: 08 May 12 17:27
i didn't look at the prices flash offered , ian , but at 1/5th i bet to arround 107%.
maybe that was the reason that after betting next to me on saturday he went as far away as he could on sunday.
actually , flash bookie took 40 more bets than me on his above figures....they all seemed to be on the last race winner though.
By:
Racecourse Regular
When: 08 May 12 20:09
Barry would be fine cos he got a backer, he would then hope to take more money to arb back on here, he cannot arb as much as the part time bookmakers he quotes are taking some of the ever dwindling turnover..... not sure how the idea fits in with the idea of healthy competition and free trade
By:
theressomepratsonhere
When: 08 May 12 20:17
thats the one
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com