|
By:
LOL, idiot
|
|
By:
lack of consistency
|
|
By:
Correct decision imho, but awful cercumstances.
|
|
By:
No bets for me and I feel sick.
|
|
By:
Agree 100% Muqbil, a new low for British horseracing today...
|
|
By:
Gutted for that owner but correct decision
|
|
By:
overturned at Portman Square nap
|
|
By:
justice in my opinion, francombe shown up there with his comments about cecils horse definitely keepin it
|
|
By:
Its right, it's just very sad.
|
|
By:
muqbil fair decision imo it was only a sh after all .
|
|
By:
agreed the French stewards would never have taken the race of one of thier most popular trainers and given the rase to the English, absolute disgraceful decision
|
|
By:
Big Arab owner vs a Black man
sickening |
|
By:
wouldnt av got thrown out in a mid week race
cant believe it appened in a classic |
|
By:
fishing
|
|
By:
Thought it was evens each of two ,so cant be surprized.
|
|
By:
Gents - every day of the week you see worse instances of interference with the first past the post keeping the race.
|
|
By:
justice in my opinion, francombe shown up there with his comments about cecils horse definitely keepin it
Francome is hopeless on these decisions |
|
By:
God there are some idiots! The horse got carried across the track due to the other jockeys whip use!
|
|
By:
Leave out out, joshuag.
There are far far worse incidents every day that don't even make it to the stewards room. |
|
By:
I've seen far worse where the first past the post kept the race. Not possible to second guess them these days...
|
|
By:
they have done that because it was the favourite that was beaten
- it is completely inconsistent with other decision made in those circumstances and a disgrace |
|
By:
It could only happen here the gutless bar stewards
The lack of consistency is appaling |
|
By:
to anyone that disagrees watch the whole race and see where the inteference is...special duty was crusin past and got hampered.
|
|
By:
to anyone that disagrees watch the whole race and see where the inteference is...special duty was crusin past and got hampered.
|
|
By:
It was the right decision. Very sad in this case though. Francome looked a bit of a clown too.
|
|
By:
^ exactly. Can look forward to 2 reversals a week from now on. Or maybe not
|
|
By:
Astonished at you Muqbil, tbh.
|
|
By:
I don't follow the sport really anymore, but what has happened to everyone on here saying you have to just about kill another runner to get thrown out?
|
|
By:
Its a really sad thing for the connections of Jaquelines Quest. I think it was the right decision and heartbreaking it happens in a Group 1 classic.
What a sad shame the rules are not consistently followed |
|
By:
awful stuff , never stopped the other one riding
|
|
By:
Good to see the fancied horse win- punters need a break from these rags.
|
|
By:
loper, every day there are worse cases that never make it into the room.
Give the jockey a few days, leave the result would have happened in 9999 out of 10,000 cases. |
|
By:
It's all about the winning distance fawwon. if it's a nose, and you touch the other horse, you're in big trouble. You have to just about kill the other horse if you win by half a length or more though.
|
|
By:
It was a pretty straightforward decision, if the rules were to be applied correctly. Just a massive race to have to take it on.
|
|
By:
exactly muqbil
|
|
By:
if the winner wasnt cecil trained & the 2nd wasnt french,that would have been 1.3 to get the race,people didnt think they would chuck a cecil horse out imo.
|
|
By:
The distance was a nose. Was the interference LIKELY to have affected the result.
Answer-Yes. |
|
By:
Winning distance was key.
|
|
By:
No, no and thrice, NO!!!
|