Rather than waffle on using past results to prove points, which
IMO, is meaningless without prices as it happens, let's see how
this evenings's match pans out.
Ipswich v Coventry.
Does it qualify for the system ?
If so the lay price of the draw is 3.80.
What about it then ?

Easy money ? In your dreams.

Kenilworth, are you really this stupid?

posted early this afternoon i would be using the ipswich/cov game.  posted about 4 times actually.

I dont sit all day on this forum you know.  I also said I would be looking at horsens/odense to be a draw at halftime and it was.

laid it @ 2.50 and 63rd min odense 2-1, then 3 mins later 3-1


had 5 trades 5 winners.


you upset because you thought ipswich was going to be a low scoring game.  You obviously thought i was going to lose here as you have posted elsewhere you thought this would be 0-0

I knew different [;)]

Thanks i-only-lay, but that's okay. You're the one who has the strong and well-reasoned views, so I will try and leave this thread to you as much as possible.   I have felt compelled to jump in a couple of times today when Kenilworth was spouting nonsense..

Generally though, I think it would be better if the rest of us left this thread to you as much as possible. Paul, in particular, likes to chat, so the fewer of us there are on here, the fewer chances he'll have to blether on to somebody and fill up a potentially very interesting thread with irrelevant guff!

Do like these bets sometimes, but only on price. Just laid the Torino match 0-0 at 55mins draw@2.08

ipswich: £13.77
coventry: £116.28
draw: £116.28

i deally I want it back to 2-2,  then i lay the draw and someone wins 3-2 in stoppage time and make £500

Has it occurred to anyone who layed the draw at Ipswich
and closed their bet after a goal, they, in effect gave
away 77% of their profit from the lay ? doesn't seem very
clever to me.

must be a game we can target each day to use this system on

This 'laying the draw' then backing the draw when a goal is scored
is an old chestnut, marketed a few years ago, called (I think) THE
CASH GENERATOR. The weakness thought at the time was the 0-0 draw,
the slight chance of two quick goals, and dependence on prices. GL
to those who play.

It seems to me that if there was a way of predicting the "correct"price on the cs markets pre match ie-0-0,1-1,2-2 ltd would be an excellant way to trade yourself to semi riches. Soccer mystic is s hite by the way. . .

isnt it one of the top 4 scores

well what you reckon kenno if we pick a 0-0 every 8/9 games are we in profit overall long term?

just realised the original liability on the Lyon draw here is £230

Following on from those stats I posted a few days ago saying Fulham had more 0-0 draws than anyone in the league last year, I see they've just recorded another 0-0 in the League Cup tonight. In fact, combined with the 0-0 with Aston Villa in the Prem League, that's two 0-0 draws for Fulham already this season!  (And that's not including the 0-0 recorded in the Uefa Cup..)     

I guess an aversion to seeing goals being scored would help if you're a Fulham fan.

Well they're not doing an awful lot wrong as such (I was talking about them more in the context of a team to avoid if you're laying the 0-0 and hoping for there to be goals).  However, they're not wildly exciting are they?  Their solidity is, in its way, something of an achievement, but I doubt their fans go there expecting to be thrilled and aroused every week! (And I thought football was supposed to be about passion.)

Also, should they get pulled down into a relegation fight this year, I think their fans will quite quickly turn on them - being bored by their own football team is acceptable when the side is doing well, but it'll become something of a sore point if they're dull but not even certain of staying in the Prem.

Well if I was a Fulham supporter, I'd perhaps be sending covetous glances in the direction of Stoke and Bolton, who are at least making an attempt to lift themselves to higher heights. It may end in tears, but at least they're having a go at being something other than safe and bland.

Anyway, I'm not interested in having a long discussion about this. I don't have any particular gripe about Fulham, even if I think they are the most boring side in the PL in terms of the thrills they give their supporters. I was really only highlighting their lack of a scoring edge since it's important to anyone looking for a team not to lay 0-0 draws on.  But then, since you've misinterpreted almost every other comment on this thread, it doesn't surprise me that you're getting overly stroppy about mine.

I was the only one who mentioned Fulham. You came straight back with a post all about Fulham, posing the final question what were they doing wrong?  I can only assume that was a response to what I had posted, and I don't see there was any 'flattery' involved on my part.

I never said most of your posts were responses to me, just that that particular one was, and also that you had misinterpreted almost all of the other comments (mostly written by people other than me) on the thread. And again you've misinterpreted my comment just now, so there's a theme here.

Anyway, this was a worthwhile thread earlier in the week. I was trying to get a discussion going about which clubs we might want to keep an eye open for with regards to avoiding scoreless draws, and you seem to be trying to turn it into a pointless debate about what makes for a well-run team. (If you want to talk about that, why don't you start a thread on the football forum?)

This particular topic clearly isn't of interest to you, but, strangely enough, this forum doesn't revolve around you.   Like I said before, if you want to go and keep discussing this, feel free to start a thread on the topic and I'm sure you'll have plenty of people discussing the merits of being a safe and secure side as opposed to one which is spending money (though not in excessive amounts) in an attempt to aim at higher success (Stoke).

Just read a few of your earlier posts on this thread. It
seems you don't really have a clue as to what you are
doing.