Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 202 comments are related to the topic:
Impact of PC2 a look at the FACTUAL numbers....

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 202
By:
Lori
When: 18 Aug 11 19:34
.
http://community.betfair.com/general_betting/go/thread/view/94082/23542162/curious-about-some-odd-activity-at-betfair?sort_order=DESC&pg=48
By:
Martinch
When: 18 Aug 11 19:38
wow... I never knew about that (I *think* the first I heard of it was an email from them).

I stand corrected.
By:
birch2
When: 18 Aug 11 22:17
good post magician

id keep an open mind regarding your term 'FACTUAL'

Martinch has just had his eyes opened as to the contempt and arrogance this outfit has for their customers  -  so if its their database, they can make it say what they like!

Worse corporate measures than this, occur all the time
By:
The Magician (100)
When: 18 Aug 11 22:26
Birch2

They 'could' make it say what they like... except I monitor many of the markets live bet by bet.... so they cant lie on those sports... and to date they have not...

they could pump them up with real bets... but to make an impact they would leave lose loads of cash to the Pros... so cant see them doing that either.
By:
nairda
When: 18 Aug 11 23:42
when betfair will get 60% of the pro cash, it be good risk to take later on   ...10 i win  4 i lose on even money bets
By:
katverrat
When: 19 Aug 11 09:23
magician

do you think that their 'tekkie' people could bet & lay their own amounts, w/o leaving loads of cash for the pros?
By:
The Magician (101)
When: 19 Aug 11 11:19
Katverrat

no I don't think they are the sophisticated... and even that would show up as spikes in matched volume at sub second level, and that is not really happening

certainly not more than previously i.e the occasional big bet is matched between refresehes that that is not seen (by me as money on the screen) but I am sure it WAS money on the screen, it is just that you cant see everything....
By:
ballabriggs
When: 19 Aug 11 11:43
"when betfair will get 60% of the pro cash, it be good risk to take later on   ...10 i win  4 i lose on even money bets "

to pay 60% , you have to win more than 97.5% of your bets.  so if you can place bet lose 10 or win 4 which you win 97.5% of the time, sounds like good bets to make Laugh[;)]
By:
The Magician (101)
When: 19 Aug 11 12:11
if you are a 60% PC payer...

now even money chances are really 6/4 ( minus you normal com rate
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 19 Aug 11 12:28
I hate to keep sounding like I am pro pc as I dont like being charged as much as anyone and really I
have no right to argue with those that have to pay it when I dont but my general point is that
if your clever surely persons can still make profits and increase them and if there liquidity is doubling and sometimes tripling every 3 years then thats around 27%-40% increased liquidity per year which will raise pro payers matched amounts and offset the charge pretty soon more so if one expands range of markets and/or bets in markets!

Its all relative and just needs putting into perspective, and ok betfair are getting big payments
and that money does not end up in customers bank accounts but that creates a healthy system of reliance and ensures the longevity of the eco-system and the acceptance of persistent winners as to ban them now would cut off betfairs extra profits, also betfair can hopefully use this extra income to further increase there growth and better deals for new and existing customers.
By:
Eddie the eagle
When: 19 Aug 11 13:05
ballabriggs
19 Aug 11 11:43   

"when betfair will get 60% of the pro cash, it be good risk to take later on   ...10 i win  4 i lose on even money bets "

to pay 60% , you have to win more than 97.5% of your bets.  so if you can place bet lose 10 or win 4 which you win 97.5% of the time, sounds like good bets to make


ballabriggs, you clearly don't understand how the PC2 works, so maybe tou should stp commenting on it all the time.
By:
jabmast
When: 19 Aug 11 13:18
Magician, when are the next 3 month reports due to be published?
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Aug 11 13:57
They 'could' make it say what they like... except I monitor many of the markets live bet by bet.... so they cant lie on those sports... and to date they have not...

they could pump them up with real bets... but to make an impact they would leave lose loads of cash to the Pros... so cant see them doing that either.


Magician, you cannot be serious. You'll be telling us next you know when Adam Heathcote goes on holiday. At zero percent commission betfair could bump up turnover and break even without even resorting to front running or queue peeking.
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 19 Aug 11 14:02
By the way, banning all the pc2 payers because they do nothing more than win would actually cripple betfair as there exchange is totally different to a conventional bookmaker. without there liquidy value
the amount of matched bets would slow down which will effect all there charging systems and  flaten there current profit margins, If the start to match the bets themselves then they cannot claim to be an exchange anymore and being a bookmaker they would have to drop prices, ban all winners etc

Under these conditions there longevity would be months not years as a profitable company
perhaps the best option was to charge the winners more and keep them on there side but it
is certainly a risky move by them raising the bar on charges!
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 19 Aug 11 14:03
can anybody post a single piece of evidence that that's actually happening, as opposed to convoluted speculation that it could be?
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 19 Aug 11 14:09
Well I am thinking of selling crystal balls to all the customers, not to be used for predicting the winners of races but to find out how much we can be expected to be charged for winning, what betfair will do next, what betfair want from us, what there share vale is, whos in charge of them and

i reckon my clairvoyant equipment may be the only way to find out and will sell like hot cakes[;)]
By:
bf_fananatic
When: 19 Aug 11 14:12
One thing that is certain is that betfair will continue to be successful, how much success they afford others will be a different matter
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Aug 11 14:40
pres, I'm not saying it's happening. I'm saying that if they needed to manipulate the figures they could and would have every reason to do so.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Aug 11 14:41
We seem to be mainly at loggerheads these days magician. Please do not take it personally. I have to call these things as I see them.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Aug 11 14:43
Also pres, if they were manipulating them, evidence wouldn't exist (outside of a confession) because of the inclusion of ping-pong money in betfair's figures.
By:
TheInvestor2
When: 19 Aug 11 14:45
Adam Heathcote isn't trading anymore.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 19 Aug 11 14:46
Why is that investor?
By:
The Magician (100)
When: 22 Aug 11 17:39
4 weeks now of 'like 4 like' data - enjoy

    market        *2010 22nd June to 18th July        *2011 21st June to 17th July        *2010 19th July to 14th August        *2011 18th July to 13th August   
    Racing        173193330        207474967        235696207        224823676   
    Racing        233667433        262355526        268262629        274832309   
    Racing        265593323        270291956        237172993        239428121   
    Racing        248625191        266720408        190073001        189949490   
    Basketball        603182        3131207        1614370        2231636   
    Basketball        2998784        6079156        1981741        1044464   
    Basketball        4535144        4356091        2241281        1051043   
    Basketball        4588200        2683569        2044001        1079473   
    Cricket        30650129        28752390        27760354        46746527   
    Cricket        46788233        70647461        40544508        65089622   
    Cricket        54937944        108999010        38386053        57227222   
    Cricket        38383120        59957170        24436407        72512980   
    Golf        3776828        4969318        5323529        3709932   
    Golf        7245676        4369428        7044625        5326052   
    Golf        6306862        7193612        7331986        7375197   
    Golf        30507071        29924707        18435627        18656876   
    Greyhounds        8742428        9848900        10578100        11135488   
    Greyhounds        12808598        12120335        12938977        12512774   
    Greyhounds        11871820        12099819        13075536        11951211   
    Greyhounds        12301352        12657297        10721403        10746202   
    Other        9718283        8826635        33202629        31033210   
    Other        19257592        30356207        28328571        24050852   
    Other        19879678        20249010        21794305        23556833   
    Other        18397438        20467587        9906373        11730367   
    Soccer        452392262        96528042        91508505        128281757   
    Soccer        495952067        152254184        144499104        174267101   
    Soccer        244499961        184199711        168377573        200642731   
    Soccer        167020109        191554032        122684549        156315863   
    Tennis        236603781        396835796        163674409        166473088   
    Tennis        264054047        416790320        175788201        198156286   
    Tennis        165645175        252704215        149452169        161357835   
    Tennis        177276303        218201300        202212471        197594653   
By:
The Magician (100)
When: 22 Aug 11 17:43
perhaps obviously (or not) the 4 weeks are posted in order - top to bottom
By:
jfc
When: 23 Aug 11 03:12
By my calculations, comparing the 2011 before/after July 18 figures (aka Cols 3&5):

12 Ups
20 Drops

Segments on average Down by 20,084,840

Damning figures.
By:
The Magician (100)
When: 23 Aug 11 09:14
JFC

what do you get if you do the samne analysis for colums 1 and 4 :o)

(obviously soccer world cup needs to be discounted)
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 23 Aug 11 10:50
Ok here goes..using Magician's figures and excluding soccer because of the WC

Tennis.......down 25.5%
Greyhounds...down 3.3%
Other........down 25.6%
Golf.........down 4.2%
Cricket........up 13.2%
Basketball...down 28.6%
Horse Racing.down 8.8%

Overall......down 16.6% (slightly worse than last set of figures)

Caveat...I accept no resposibility if I have made a typo
By:
ballabriggs
When: 23 Aug 11 11:12
"Overall......down 16.6% (slightly worse than last set of figures)" :O

oh well.  at least david yu is staying and not bailing ship,..
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 23 Aug 11 13:01
I understand why Betfair have done what they've done... they thought it's going to raise extra revenue, but I don't understand why they completely lost sight of the bigger picture.  If this measure doesn't bring in more cash in the short term, then it sure as dammit won't in the long term.

Said this before because I totally believe it and am saying it again in light of these figures.  Fundamentally a betting exchange is the epitome of a free market and a free market works best with low taxation and incentivising business.  They tipped the line with this super charge which was badly, and I expect far too hastily thought through.  I'm sure there are plenty of people in the company that realise they've made a massive balls up.

I can't imagine too, how the majority of those people affected don't feel exploited and a large percentage of those affected are among the most important customers Betfair has.  I know you need liquidity providers and recreational punters, but liquidity providers are more important per head, it's much harder and there are far fewer of them.  Just like in the economy there are businesses and customers, but it's businesses that leads a country to wealth and every country knows first and foremost they need to encourage business.  I know the exchange concept is unique in that given free trade it's very hard for it not to tend towards a natural monopoly and Betfair dominates as things stand, but I find it bizarre how a business thinks the best way to move forward is to alienate so many of it's most important customers who are only betting here because they have to, whereas they used to bet here because they wanted to.  The brand suffers and the image suffers.  It's marketing niche in the betting sector is built on it being a value product (albeit less value than it was as higher charges kick in), but it was a value product and the punters' champion.  They stopped being the punters' champion around 2006/2007.

There are some people who believe in the mantra (fair) winning business is bad for business on here.  I don't know if some people in Betfair believe that but it's on the whole rubbish imo.
By:
eggman
When: 23 Aug 11 13:37
Interesting post CLYDEBANK29.  Are there any other exchanges in the world where active and successful users - who are largely liquidity providers - are penalised?  I’d be interested to know.

In my case, I haven’t bet here since the Wimbledon final (around that time they announced the new charge being introduced on 18th July).  I can’t see how anyone would pay 40-60% (maybe some are).

It further demoralises normal PC payers from continuing to use the site and will continue to have a slow drain on the exchange as whole.  If I was a normal PC payer I would be actively looking to change my habits and move away before getting anywhere near the top PC bracket.

I presume from all this that Betfair are expecting reduced liquidity and increased revenues (not from the higher PC payers - any tax over 50% will be actively avoided, it’s human nature - but from Betfair taking a more active role in their markets).  The problem with this could be that they’re left with a site that:

(i)  no longer attracts previous core users who want a purely exchange model and a largely level playing field, and
(ii) continues to receive a lukewarm response from the casual punter due to many features being unnecessary and overly complicated.

I will be interested in the outcome not for financial reasons as all my activity has ceased, but because I’ve spent a lot of time here in the past.  Whilst I’ve done OK here over the years, I generally presumed it was a fairly symbiotic relationship between my activity and the success of Betfair.  I was obviously mistaken and have effectively been shown the door.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 23 Aug 11 14:21
Are there any other exchanges in the world where active and successful users - who are largely liquidity providers - are penalised?  I’d be interested to know.


If anything they will be thinking of commission reductions and incentives to stick offers up.  It's a different set of rules they have to play by though as Betfair is the price maker.
By:
The Magician (100)
When: 23 Aug 11 14:41
Ok here goes..using Magician's figures and excluding soccer because of the WC

Tennis.......down 25.5%
Greyhounds...down 3.3%
Other........down 25.6%
Golf.........down 4.2%
Cricket........up 13.2%
Basketball...down 28.6%
Horse Racing.down 8.8%

Overall......down 16.6% (slightly worse than last set of figures)


is that the decline for 2011 or 2010
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 23 Aug 11 15:05
that's the relative increase or decrease in turnover for 2011 in the 4 weeks after the 18th July 2011 to the four weeks before the 18th July 2011

compared to

to the relative increase or decrease in turnover for the equivalent periods in 2010.

So for example in 2010 if turnover increased by 5% in the 4 weeks after the 18th July 2010 compared to the 4 weeks before it and in 2011 turnover decreased by 5% in the 4 weeks from the 18th July 2011 compared to the 4 weeks before that....the relative effect (comparative decline from 2010 to 2011) would be a decline of 10%
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 23 Aug 11 17:03
I don't know why anybody bothers looking at these figures. If you stripped all two way trades from the figures the turnover would plummet but the liquidity would pretty much stay the same. If the figures showed an increase you could say betfair were playing ping-pong to boost them, if they show a decrease you could say some 60%ers have jacked it but there's been no decrease in real liquidity. A pointless exercise.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 23 Aug 11 17:22
Feck you have to use what there is and that is the only measure we have.  It's speculation to suggest what type of turnover that has been lost and imo commission will be lost along the same lines.  If its premium charge payers that they've lost then they've also lost their original pc1 payments.  Secondly, if ping pong money is easy to win then you could argue it will suffer the least and it's those people that price whole markets up and gambling that will suffer the most as it takes much more effort.  I can speak for myself to echo that stance as since the PC2 has been introduced, apart from a one week exception, I've virtually just done a little ping ponging or nothing at all.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 23 Aug 11 18:11
I suppose ping-pong money would be the least likely to go Clydebank.
By:
TheInvestor2
When: 24 Aug 11 01:19
CLYDEBANK29

good post at 13:01. The exchange's monopoly position is what throws a spanner in the works. Without that Betfair would never have dreamed of doing this.
By:
askari1
When: 24 Aug 11 02:40
Clydebank, imv it's very hard for any kind of betting company to think of its clients in terms of either liquidity providers (i.e. suppliers) or punters (i.e. end customers).

It's more natural for them to think of anyone with an accnt. as a bettor and to be nettled at the amount that some bettors are taking them for (and e.g. to compare the profits of the most profitable players w/ those of the platform provider).

It's then inevitable that bf will begin to think how they can claw some of the money back.

I can accept that pc2 was hastily conceived and was intended partly to help project a trajectory of profit growth for the City, but my sense is that a strong motivation in some parts of the company was simply to do as well as big winners (or to stop them betting on terms where bf got the worse of the implicit profit share arrangement).

My suspicion all along with the new charges is that they wd be happy w/ 3-5 major liquidity providers per major sport on one side and a mass of price-taking recreational punters on the other. Why shd they accommodate anyone else at a rate of comm. to profit of less than 40%
By:
marky sparky
When: 24 Aug 11 09:33
Can anybody get the alternative figures for purple?  Now that would be interesting.....
By:
TheVis
When: 24 Aug 11 11:11
You'd have to strip out the made up money from the Duck's figures first ie the first 20k matched on every race, every day.
Page 4 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com