|
By:
Sorry good Dr. However for all the prophet hunters out there I had to save this beautiful thread from extinction.
|
|
By:
I look forewood to the thyme when this thread is as eggstinked as the dodo.
|
|
By:
Dr. did either method qualify for Cracovia vs Arka game currently in play?
|
|
By:
No- the odds were terrible.
Possibility is the Sochaux game at 4.00 UK time! |
|
By:
Slicer if you had of waited 15 minutes you would have got good odds.
|
|
By:
If i have your system or something close.
You could have hosed in a 7%, 7%. 14% profit if you had of followed a strict staking plan in the last game going by the odds 15 mins into the game on the odds at HT. |
|
By:
The odds were terrible when I looked. If the odds are terrible when I look, the game dont qualify. Time, Tide and Dr Slicer weight for no man!
And I have my Methods witch are different from yours. Mine works 100% of the time. I hope yours does! Good luck! |
|
By:
Prophets locked in!
|
|
By:
Made a helms of my start to my system there.
The krakow match was awful value really.. i totally missed a huge aspect of my excel sheet! Forgot to include getting back my initial HT lay stake at halftime! So stupid and cost me pretty much the whole bet in the end! |
|
By:
Gimme a break slicer,...... mathematicly 100% is impossible you know that !!!
I thought you would be somehow serious ...... dont proof me wrong..... |
|
By:
Wot is you on about Martin?
|
|
By:
Shirley you have read the hole thread!
|
|
By:
Slicer can you offer me some advice, what is the usual relationship between odds of 0-0FT before a game and odds of 0-0FT at halftime.
Is there is a steady relationship or is it fluid? |
|
By:
You stated your Method works 100% this is a redicolous claim,.... thats all,.... -- need proof ok here we go:
If your system would have no gap where eventualy money could flow out under certain conditions, (even if only for a second in time).... then you couldnt suck out money of the market,... how easy was that ........ lets just say it works 99.999999 % of all times,..... Thinking it through there is indeed a possibilty for 100%,... maybe some BF Softeware Bug :) Dont get me wrong,..... but you cant just insist that you invented the money printer without sounding a little bit strange can you ;) |
|
By:
I am a bit strange! I admit it. Their is a very fine line between genius and madness. And frankly I can be mad, BUT I AM ALWEIGHS A GENIUS!
I hope this clarifies the situation. Dr Aristotle Slicer PhD MB BS B Pharm MRCVS DRCOG Cert BhD |
|
By:
I'm gutted that you don't have an MD.
|
|
By:
Blimey- I was at University for 17 years getting all them qualifaecations, and MD would of meant moore years of studenting in the USA! I kneaded to put my qualaes into practice!
|
|
By:
alfie....email me if you have the inclination...ive a feeling my system isnt a million miles off yours and if im right, a bit of tweaking here and there, makes it a veritable goldmine, but the krakow match is a common mistake using this system as the bets are in different markets so the what if function cant be fully utilised....maybe we can have a mutual brainstorming session some time..
bwlong@h o t m a i l.com |
|
By:
sorry its bwlong1961@h o t m a i l.com
|
|
By:
actually im having trouble logging onto that :( look just let me know if you are interested, we dont have to divulge our methods fully if you dont want to, but post on this thread if keen....i will set up another email adress tomorrow...cheers :)
|
|
By:
not many games have a market for GOALS INDEX so that can perhaps be excluded?
|
|
By:
I have 2 systems at the moment.
Both dont't seem very lucrative tbh 1) is a HT FT 1 goal or more combo 2)is a HT FT FT lay off combo. I have working excel sheets on both now (eventually) but tbh they without knowing the 1 goal or more price at halftime and the FT0-0 price at halftime one cannot secure a profit for sure. |
|
By:
alfie my method works if the pre match market is right...or wrong in my case, as thats the edge, it only takes a modest difference in the expected price to secure a guarantee profit, because the price of the third ''clincher'' bet is often uniform
|
|
By:
billy hill you made a comment the other day which i shot vdown in flames because you had forgotten a few pitfalls...however you probably dont realise just how close you are to cracking a successfull method...its one of two systems im honing in on...and it appears alfie and youself are at least barking up the right tree
|
|
By:
chosen correctly and used continuously mine should make a profit.
But there are occasions where a single bet will not go well. Say losing 4%. |
|
By:
Can you guys not spell??? It's P-R-O-P-H-E-T!
|
|
By:
alfie as someone posted earlier, the half time price of 0-0 for full time is as a pretty accurate guide the 'square root'' ie if the starting price is 16.0 for 0-0, it will be at or around 4.0, rising in some instances to 4.5 at half time. if the 0-0 is large at the start ie 24.0, then expect around 5.5/6.0
|
|
By:
alfie there is nearly always a scenario when you could lose a very small percentage of your outlay...you should expect and accept that
|
|
By:
I may patent this thread as a flotation device - unsinkable.
It is possible to produce a realistic mathematical model of the way odds move, but there is a fair bit of variation in the real movement, in play, to make you wary of being led entirely by the model. It is, however, possible to exclude a large number of possibilities using modelling. This is essential. I almost certainly know what a slicer system has to do. I have found a number of candidates but none of them work 100% of the time, although there will be some that I haven't yet been able to exclude. The problem is in the dynamics. You need a full data set to have proper predictive quality. Slicer says he spotted the pattern over time. If his system exists then that is a possibility. I enjoy reading threads here, especially those looking for systems. The bottom line is that it is your ninepence I am trying to win and telling you how to win mine is not a sensible option. On the other hand, if you like digging holes, I'm happy to lend you a spade. |
|
By:
OK guys- over 400 postings now- shirley it is time to let it lie!
|
|
By:
It's an intersesting thread Slicer. I've learnt a lot from this thread, although - nothing about your system.
And don't call me Shirley |
|
By:
I am NOT perleased anywon finds this thread intersting cos it meens it will never drop off the bottom! :(
|
|
By:
lol I expect you're right Dr...I have high hopes for this thread cracking the 1000 mark by Christmas.!. A warm glow of satisfaction will be apparent come that time and I imagine ideas will still be thrown into this cauldron of sharp minds!.
Like any one we have our price of course.....and you know what it is ;-). NO MORE CLUES! Oh all right then........it's the opposite of NO MORE CLUES! |
|
By:
Cartway- You wooden want me to give aweigh my hedge wood you?
You wood! You is one bad egg then! ;) |
|
By:
Dr Slicer maybe you could give us a clue to your steaking and prophet making per bet
i.e. per bet etc level steaks makes 10% thank you for your time dr cheers |
|
By:
This is my theory. Slicer has no system. He gets his fans to think up systems, he gets them to e-mail them to him to see if they are 'his' system, then he nicks them.
|
|
By:
I wish I wood of thought of that Corky! Wot a grate idear!
I often risk £3k to win £200. I hope that answers the questions and clarifies the matter even further. Off to have some tiffin before theUK evening session starts! Good luck. |
|
By:
Interesting. I have a risk £76 to win £5 situation in testing. Same %age ...
|
|
By:
That is on my Single Correct Score In Running Lay Method.
Of coarse with my Holy Grail Method their is no risk at all! |
|
By:
why not just lay the draw and wait for a goal,sounds good to me and works well,sometimes the old way is often the best
|