Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 426 comments are related to the topic:
Gambler claiming 250k from C0ral tells court bookie 'cheated' by claiming Rangers weren't relegated
Gambler claiming 250k from C0ral tells court bookie 'cheated' by claiming Rangers weren't relegated
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 426
|
By:
Jack Hacksaw 19 Jan 17 14:52 Joined: 08 Jan 02 | Topic/replies: 3,116 | Blogger: Jack Hacksaw's blog So every bet where bookies lose is a mistake?! So they say Look at this quote form yesterday James Doleman @jamesdoleman 1h1 hour ago Sandison 'Odds of 2500/1 would only be offered on an event that wouldn't happen?" They do sometimes happen Fox replies |
|
By:
bookies offer bets in excess of 2500/1 all the time
can we get a refund on all of our mug accas ? |
|
By:
Yes Poole punters side
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Brief should have used the analogy of picking up pennies in front of a steamroller.
One day, you will get caught out. |
|
By:
donny osmond 19 Jan 17 14:55 Joined: 02 Mar 08 | Topic/replies: 67,721 | Blogger: donny osmond's blog
bookies offer bets in excess of 2500/1 all the time can we get a refund on all of our mug accas ? I'll have a scroll through my 100+ bookie accounts since earlys 2000s  Might need to call up some relatives that never knew i used their names for free bets etc but they should be kl with that |
|
By:
neither side is interpreting the correct protocol imo
Or James Doleman isn't. |
|
By:
As this was 2014 or whenever, has the barrister asked Coral if they have altered their T & C to clear up any ambiguity.
|
|
By:
wondersobright 19 Jan 17 14:55 Joined: 13 Jun 06 | Topic/replies: 37,229 | Blogger: wondersobright's blog Jan 19, 2017 -- 2:51PM, TheChaser wrote: James Doleman @jamesdoleman 3m3 minutes agoPoole notes bookies gave 5000/1 odds on Leicester City winning the league"They make mistakes" she suggestsAnd he just gets hit with this all the timeNo wonder they call them Kangaroo courts that's his own QC trying to defend him neither side is interpreting the correct protocol imo Yeah i mean Judge keeps getting told 2500/1 was too high But Kinlochs defence just say 500/1 It's basically 2500/1 is wrong err but Leicester 5000 10 mins later repeat # Dolan is having technical issues ( phoned died probably ) just as he was building a twitter following |
|
By:
'Poole ends, Sandison for Coral rises and begins by accusing Kinloch of "concealing his vast background in gambling" and being "self serving"'
Clearly there is a requirement for gambling with Corals that you must not have done much of it before. |
|
By:
How much would Kinloch cash out for now
I say 100k and run |
|
By:
Id take £100k if I was him.
|
|
By:
punter is obviously dodgier than the bookie in this case as he thought he could pull a fast one.
rangers weren't relegated - even with a points deduction they weren't in a relegation spot. they were thrown out of the league because of financial problems - some legitimate and some imagined. |
|
By:
that's exactly my understanding of it outpost
defo pulling a fast 1 but does have a case that there is ambiguity and coral should have offered an ex gratia payment before it ever got to this stage |
|
By:
Even if the judge favours the bookie, should still recommend they still have to cough up 40% of bet because of the ambiguity side of it. Can see that **** Clare on morning line on sat "and as a goodwill gesture we gave him 10k"
|
|
By:
Sometimes Corals man doth protest too much.
Whether it is Oldco/Newco, 'relegation' of demotion, or whether the odds were too high. Typical lawyer tactics |
|
By:
wonder if pre-court he would have accepted 10k which would have been 100 quid @ 100/1??
|
|
By:
I wonder what if he was offered his £100 back when he tried to collect
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'd be wary of believing everything on twitter is an accurate summing up of what is happening. I don't see how he gets paid out in this. Rangers ceased to exist in any league in Scotland for a period of time due to the fact they were liquidated then re applied to the first devision and then the third division. That is so far away from relegation as it could possibly be.
|
|
By:
who is paying his court fees btw??
|
|
By:
Does judge have discretion to say 'Make it £100k'.
I am not sure. |
|
By:
Case should be void anyway
Payout should be 250k plus his 100 stake back |
|
By:
Does judge have discretion to say 'Make it £100k'.
I am not sure. No either the contract means one thing or it doesn't he can't just make it up. |
|
By:
I dont think he will get paid out.
Bias of judiciary towards fine and outstanding corporate body against low-life gambler. |
|
By:
Thats what I thought, shrewd. Ta
|
|
By:
This is my Coral accounts status
Your account is currently suspended Please contact our Customer Service team by clicking on Live Chat or by using any of the options below and we'll be happy to help you. - Call from UK: 0800 44 0011 - Call from Ireland: 1800 936955 - Call from outside UK: +44 (0)208 507 5544 - Email: help@coral.co.uk |
|
By:
Judges don't do cash outs lols
|
|
By:
So is there no Jury ?
|
|
By:
correct
|
|
By:
Should have had 12 Betfair pros on the Jury
|
|
By:
Judge rules Coral and walks out with Brown Envelope
|
|
By:
Mind you this is a Glaswegian he could have the Judge bought
No wonder it's in Edinburgh |
|
By:
Sandison "Rangers were not moved to a lower league " - you sure about that ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
James Doleman @jamesdoleman 5m5 minutes ago
Sandison tells the court the word "relegation" comes from ancient Rome from when someone was exiled after displeasing the emperor. Bringing in the Romans now FFS |
|
By:
|
|
By:
wondersobright
wondersobright 19 Jan 17 15:19 Joined: 13 Jun 06 | Topic/replies: 37,235 | Blogger: wondersobright's blog Jan 19, 2017 -- 3:16PM, TheChaser wrote: Should have had 12 Betfair pros on the Jury Laugh torture would be legalised and capital punishment would be back in an instant if betfair forumites were given free reign Laugh Angry mob outside would be waiting to lynch Clare |
|
By:
guantanamo wouldn't be sufficient for dealing with clare
|
|
By:
 |
