|
By:
Now that's feckING NAUGHTY!!!!
All time low this, suspending the lads acca when it's winning. In their TCS that this is legit WTF |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
Suggest you get Paul Haigh Total Respect involved on here, he assists with betting disputes and invariably gets them paid with a threat of small claims court action
|
|
By:
isn't that what betfair is for ?
Hedging and laying - that's what I do - I have never used the cash out facility as the odds are sh!te - genuinely I did 4 teams the other week in trebles and an acca, 3 came in and the other was playing on the Sunday. The cash in value was less that the treble that was already guaranteed ??? I was guaranteed £130 and £800 if all 4 won but the offer was £128 !! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
kellydamo... it doesn't happen only on billys.
I've seen it happen more often than not on another site. |
|
By:
my main point here is the game concerned was NOT suspended, that they had suspended continuously for 30 minutes on my acca. It was in pink which meant suspended and it said suspended under the payout amount. So what I am saying here is they exclusively suspended my acca.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
If the bet had won would you have phoned them up saying I would have cashed out so ill give you half the money back?
Surely a bookie doesn't have to offer cash out on any event if they don't want too. As soon as you put a bet on that's it, down to the bookie if they offer cash back on it. I wander if they sit around laughing and joking, "I had this real idiot on the phone to me whinging, they but an acca on which lost and wanted half their winnings as there wasn't a cash out option when the bet was looking like winning" I don't mind a bit of bookie bashing, but this takes the pi$$ |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Me: I am fuming
Pleasing ![]() |
|
By:
wonder as they wander around the office
![]() |
|
By:
once you place a bet its a bet.
If your bet had won they would have paid you, it lost. They don't have to offer cash out on anything. Claiming you would have cashed out too, just at the right time when everything was in your favour ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
The game finished 0-3 to Newtown ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
This is the same tit that told everyone that his mate owned 666Bet and that it wasn't going bust and that there were no problems. You know the rest...
|
|
By:
Hills would have rather you cashed out as it locks in bigger profits for the bookie.
People need to understand that when cashing out with a bookie they are being offered odds of say 4/1 when the true odds are more like 6/1 or in your case a payout of £600 when it should have been £850. This is why bookies offer this facility because they are offering mug odds. My mates down the pub just don't get it and they think it's amazing yet they are just being ripped off week after week. I do feel for you Kelly but in no way would they suspend your acca just because it's winning. |
|
By:
just to clarify, the leatherhead game was 1-2 up @ 56 min then 1-3 at 67 before the late 89 and 90+4 goals? not 0-3 up. Something would tell me they knew it would be a draw.
|
|
By:
don't get it myself, surely u punted for all to cop not to hopefully be in front in all games and cash out? Surely thats a different wager, Ladbrokes do to be in front at anytime on their 5 coupon if thats what the guy was after. Cash outs aren't a given, if the compilers fancy their chances and want to take ur acca on they can and they will, especially if its paying pence. A cash out offer isn't compulsory and this a reminder as such for the lily livered.
|
|
By:
paolo e deserves a lot of praise for staying calm this long
has to deal with stuff like this probably 25 times a day soon there will be robots handling the "loser/crybaby needs to let of some steam" situations |
|
By:
|
|
By:
bookies always win and are always right
![]() |
|
By:
mega88
mega88 05 Oct 16 22:25 Joined: 16 May 07 | Topic/replies: 7,597 | Blogger: mega88's blog Now that's feckING NAUGHTY!!!! ![]() All time low this, suspending the lads acca when it's winning. In their TCS that this is legit WTF This is bang out of order mega aint it kelly did you lay of the 3-0 on BF or back th draw in running on the single market as you bang on about it to Paolo but he never let us know. If i was you i would sue them for messing with your account it's clearly against you bro |
|
By:
I bet Paolo was laughing his c0ck off at this exchange. Probably the only thing that got him through the graveyard shift at one of the worst bookies in the business.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
We can all agree lesson learnt here.
|
|
By:
I stopped doing accas for the same reason as this guy experienced. It's a total disgrace what they ALL do. They either suspend for ages so you cant cash out when you want to, or they offer you such a p!ss take offer that there is no point in cashing out.
|
|
By:
Here is a little tip, if your going to do accas, make sure 1 leg is later than all the others.
|
|
By:
There are some silly comments on this thread.
Firstly, these books take tens of thousands of bets. If you think any of them have time to look at your specific bet and current cashout offer, then you think too much of yourselves. And to further think that they then go out of their way to turn cashout off for your specific bet is even more deluded. You need to realise that it is in the books interest to offer cashout for as long as and as often as possible for the exact reasons that it was introduced in the first place, namely a) you pay the margin twice, sometimes three of four times over when you cashout (hence the offer is always terrible value), and b) allowing people to cash their bets out, allows them to bet their winnings/stakes back again, therefore increasing turnover. This is then be used to try to reassure share holders the next time they announce a massive drop in profits and/or increase in losses (ie the usual rubbish they spout: 'We've just had a bad run of punter-friendly results, but look; our betting turnover has increased massively, so there's nothing to worry about. Move along now, nothing to see here') |
|
By:
I agree that they take thousands of bets and don't look at everyone's bets etc. But the person this guy spoke to clearly states it's down to the traders.
I am sure there is a limit, i.e. in a winning position and stand to collect over £1k and a trader has to get involved and it's not down to some kind of bot making the decisions. You go to a high street bookie for example, put a bet on over the counter with £100 @5/1 or more and they have to get permission to take the bet from a trader. S |
|
By:
So I don't think it's unrealistic to think a person was sat there monitoring this guys acca.
|
|
By:
Ted Brogan • October 6, 2016 2:53 PM BST
There are some silly comments on this thread. Yes this being one:- Ted Brogan • October 6, 2016 12:19 PM BST On an exchange, you have the ability to request a price. If you'd have submitted an offer, I am certain you'd have been accepted and made a bigger profit than would have been offered to you by a rip-off cashout offer. You can not trade out of a 6 fold by laying one result if all the others are running at the same time. And your missing the point, all six games were live in play and did not have sussies on, yet the OP's acca did, there is a problem there. |
|
By:
Paolo E.: I am saying that our Traders have all the right to suspend and offer this facility anytime they want.
That's the damming comment right there, so if you are in with a chance of a legitimate large payout, they have the right to deny this to you without giving a reason? I would defo be complaining. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
A potential pay out of over £1k, which this was, could easily be flagged up to a trader by software.
|
|
By:
Ill go for C.
|
|
By:
I stopped doing accas for the same reason as this guy experienced. It's a total disgrace what they ALL do. They either suspend for ages so you cant cash out when you want to, or they offer you such a p!ss take offer that there is no point in cashing out.
Do people put bets on with cash out in mind, really? I had a yankee up a few weeks back and won just over 6k, cash out offer going into last (5/2ish fav) was 3k (1.6k won with 3 winners). Not a bad offer but it never really entered my head to accept it, mainly cos if you don't accept it and it loses well big deal but if you take it and it wins then it's a whole lot worse! I could have laid it off on here but I thought it would win and don't see the point in laying off for the sake of it. Mind you, I am a gambler......... |
|
By:
Yes I stopped doing them because to me it don't matter if I have 50p or £50 on it, they shouldn't take the p!ss with suspending for long periods of time or silly low offers. So to avoid it, I don't do them anymore. They should either make it a fair "cash out" or don't offer it at all, but of course that wont happen.
|