Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 568 comments are related to the topic:
Liverpoo 1.52 v Stoke City? Lay of the decade.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 6 of 15  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ... | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 568
By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 22:36
I think you're thinking about cases where you've overstaked to the point that you don't care about value anymore because you're sh*tting yourself too much. Simple solution to that - don't overstake.
By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 22:37

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:35PM, Rowan86 wrote:


In all fairness mate, with that attitude you might just as well back the Faroes against Spain and pile in again once the Faroes get an early goal. Any previous bet you've made on an event should have absolutely no bearing on any subsequent bet you make in-running. It's just another bet ffs!!


I don't know how better explain how an exchange works to you.

By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 22:37

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:33PM, Rowan86 wrote:


sofaking Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:13PM, CJ70 wrote:You need to learn how to use Betfair, Rowan86. If you are betting on Germany v San Marino, the best policy is to trade off and take profit. Anything can happen in football.Exactly.  I've tried explaining to him but he's unwilling to learn.  His type usually don't last long around here though unless they've got unlimited funds to lose.Yeah, I just can't get my head around this trading sh*t. You're just intellectual you guys. I don't get this part about how value suddenly doesn't matter and the laws of mathematics are defied. There must be a bonus prize for making a net profit on a match is there?


Do you make any money on Betfair, Rowan?   Why would I leave myself so exposed against a Liverpool goal late on in the game when I can green up at much higher odds?    And I never overstake.

By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 22:41

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:37PM, CJ70 wrote:


Oct  7, 2012 -- 10:35PM, Rowan86 wrote:In all fairness mate, with that attitude you might just as well back the Faroes against Spain and pile in again once the Faroes get an early goal. Any previous bet you've made on an event should have absolutely no bearing on any subsequent bet you make in-running. It's just another bet ffs!!I don't know how better explain how an exchange works to you.


We're wasting our time here, CJ. Looks like Rowan has studied some statistics and probability in school but he clearly has no idea how Betfair works.

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 22:46
sofaking




Date Joined: 08 Nov 07
Add contact | Send message
07 Oct 12 22:37
Joined:


08 Nov 07
| Topic/replies: 12,980 | Blogger: sofaking's blog



Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:33PM, Rowan86 wrote:


Do you make any money on Betfair, Rowan?   Why would I leave myself so exposed against a Liverpool goal late on in the game when I can green up at much higher odds?    And I never overstake.



What do you mean making yourself exposed? You're trying to make a long-term profit. You should only back Liverpool at 3.0 with 12 mins + injury time left if you think there's more than a 1 in 3 chance of Liverpool winning the match from that point because if you keep staking evenly at 3.0, you need to win more than 1 in 3 of those bets to make a profit. Any previous bet made on the same event should be completely irrelevant to the judgement you make on that unless you've staked so much that you're sh*tting yourself, so don't overstake.

Why are you so keen to make an overall profit on the match? Does someone give you a bonus prize for doing that? You should be focussed on being ahead after 1000s of bets on all events.
By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 22:47
I'm guessing he got stung backing Liverpool. There's no need for this nonsense, whatever.
By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 22:48
CJ70

07 Oct 12 22:37
Joined:


26 Nov 11
| Topic/replies: 3,712 | Blogger: CJ70's blog


Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:35PM, Rowan86 wrote:


In all fairness mate, with that attitude you might just as well back the Faroes against Spain and pile in again once the Faroes get an early goal. Any previous bet you've made on an event should have absolutely no bearing on any subsequent bet you make in-running. It's just another bet ffs!!


I don't know how better explain how an exchange works to you.



I'm wondering how to cure your irrational greening-up compulsion.
By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 22:55

I'm wondering how to cure your irrational greening-up compulsion.


.  Ok, I give up. Thanks again for your cash.  Good night. Happy

By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 22:56

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:48PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70 07 Oct 12 22:37 Joined: 26 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 3,712 | Blogger: CJ70's blog Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:35PM, Rowan86 wrote:In all fairness mate, with that attitude you might just as well back the Faroes against Spain and pile in again once the Faroes get an early goal. Any previous bet you've made on an event should have absolutely no bearing on any subsequent bet you make in-running. It's just another bet ffs!!I don't know how better explain how an exchange works to you. I'm wondering how to cure your irrational greening-up compulsion.


I'd recommend a kebab and a few beers. I'd settle for a kebab tho.

Is that greening up?

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 22:57
Cya SofaKing.

Bad luck on the bets you made on Liverpool to win at 1.77 after 35 mins, and at 3.0 with 12 mins + injury time you made! Not sure why you thought they were good value after you said that 1.52 was ridiculously short pre kick-off though!
By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 22:58

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:57PM, Rowan86 wrote:


Cya SofaKing.Bad luck on the bets you made on Liverpool to win at 1.77 after 35 mins, and at 3.0 with 12 mins + injury time you made! Not sure why you thought they were good value after you said that 1.52 was ridiculously short pre kick-off though!


Laugh

By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 22:58
Ok, this is obviously a fishing attempt.  Silly me for falling for it. Happy
By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 22:59
CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.
By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:02
This is your logic:

37 mins gone, Liverpool 0 Stoke 0. Is 1.77 a good value bet? Who gives a f*ck, I know I'm going to make a net profit off the match if I make that bet!

Why can't we apply this over a longer time period?

I'm £1000 up this week.

I'll just stick a pin in the paper and bet £500 on anything. Forget value. I know I'm going to be at least £500 up for the week whatever happens!
By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 23:02

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:59PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.


Do you think Liverpool were value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?

By:
jowjow
When: 07 Oct 12 23:03
Bravoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 23:09
Hello egner.
By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:10

CJ70

Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:59PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.


Do you think Liverpool were value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?


No I didn't. I'm dying to hear the relevance of that question!

By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 23:17

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:10PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70 Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:59PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.Do you think Liverpool were value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?No I didn't. I'm dying to hear the relevance of that question!


Then you won't think the lay was value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:19

CJ70

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:10PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70 Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:59PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.Do you think Liverpool were value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?No I didn't. I'm dying to hear the relevance of that question!


Then you won't think the lay was value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?


What?! Of course laying Liverpool at 1.52 would be value in the 90th minute. What an absurd reasoning process.

By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 23:20

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:19PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70 Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:10PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70 Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:59PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.Do you think Liverpool were value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?No I didn't. I'm dying to hear the relevance of that question!Then you won't think the lay was value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?What?! Of course laying Liverpool at 1.52 would be value in the 90th minute. What an absurd reasoning process.


Good man, Rowan. You're slowly getting the hang of it.

By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 23:22

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:20PM, sofaking wrote:


Oct  7, 2012 -- 11:19PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70 Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:10PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70 Oct 7, 2012 -- 10:59PM, Rowan86 wrote:CJ70. You're just too intellectual pal. I need to try and understand these "trade-bets". I just find it strange how value just doesn't matter with those.Do you think Liverpool were value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?No I didn't. I'm dying to hear the relevance of that question!Then you won't think the lay was value at 1.52 in the 90th minute?What?! Of course laying Liverpool at 1.52 would be value in the 90th minute. What an absurd reasoning process.Good man, Rowan. You're slowly getting the hang of it.


That is how an exchange works. Welcome to the club.

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:22
[shocked:] You just talk sh*te.
By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:26
So now you're going to explain why you thought Liverpool were value at 1.77 after 35 mins even though you thought they were ridiculous at 1.52 pre kick-off?
By:
jowjow
When: 07 Oct 12 23:28
excellent shout sofaking.....

although this time next year..asuming the scousres give Powell enough time to whip them into shape....they will be playing like the Spurs of the north...!!!!!!!

oh yeahyyyyLaughWink
By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 23:31

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:26PM, Rowan86 wrote:


So now you're going to explain why you thought Liverpool were value at 1.77 after 35 mins even though you thought they were ridiculous at 1.52 pre kick-off?


I'll let sofaking put the boot in.

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:34
CJ70






07 Oct 12 23:31
Joined:


26 Nov 11
| Topic/replies: 3,718 | Blogger: CJ70's blog





Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:26PM, Rowan86 wrote:


So now you're going to explain why you thought Liverpool were value at 1.77 after 35 mins even though you thought they were ridiculous at 1.52 pre kick-off?


I'll let sofaking put the boot in.


I'm dying for the answer! I'm expecting something silly like "I was frightened of making an overall loss on the match, so I didn't care about value!"

By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 23:36

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:34PM, Rowan86 wrote:


CJ70 07 Oct 12 23:31 Joined: 26 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 3,718 | Blogger: CJ70's blog Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:26PM, Rowan86 wrote:So now you're going to explain why you thought Liverpool were value at 1.77 after 35 mins even though you thought they were ridiculous at 1.52 pre kick-off?I'll let sofaking put the boot in.I'm dying for the answer! I'm expecting something silly like "I was frightened of making an overall loss on the match, so I didn't care about value!"


You answered the question yourself.

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:42
Oh dear God. You must be joking! What a pathetic explanation. I actually thought you might come out with something really insightful given how confident you were!

There's no bonus prize for making a net profit over all bets made on a particular match, so that shouldn't be your focus.

You're trying to make a profit over every you make on every event and the key to that is making value bets. Any previous bet you've made on an event is irrelevant. If Liverpool were bad value at 1.77, then they weren't a good bet. Simple as that. What makes you think any other bet you've made will compensate for that?
By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 23:42

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:31PM, CJ70 wrote:


Oct  7, 2012 -- 11:26PM, Rowan86 wrote:So now you're going to explain why you thought Liverpool were value at 1.77 after 35 mins even though you thought they were ridiculous at 1.52 pre kick-off?I'll let sofaking put the boot in.


I refuse to waste any more time on him. He's a lost cause. Cry

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:50
There's only 2 sensible explanations for why you made that bet SofaKing:

1. I overstaked pre-match, so I didn't care if my bet was value because I was too worried about my net liability on the event.

2. I thought Liverpool had more than a 56.5% chance of winning the match from that point i.e. I thought they were good value (ignoring commission).
By:
CJ70
When: 07 Oct 12 23:51

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:42PM, sofaking wrote:


Oct  7, 2012 -- 11:31PM, CJ70 wrote:Oct  7, 2012 -- 11:26PM, Rowan86 wrote:So now you're going to explain why you thought Liverpool were value at 1.77 after 35 mins even though you thought they were ridiculous at 1.52 pre kick-off?I'll let sofaking put the boot in.I refuse to waste any more time on him. He's a lost cause.


I'd hate to see what he'd do on a FX market.

By:
jowjow
When: 07 Oct 12 23:55
value in a sporting context is utter nonsense...only imo of course.

(actually the concept of value is nonsensical in wider applications also.... as it is such a subjective measurement as to be almost worthless)

again only imo.
By:
sofaking
When: 07 Oct 12 23:58

Oct 7, 2012 -- 11:28PM, jowjow wrote:


excellent shout sofaking.....although this time next year..asuming the scousres give Powell enough time to whip them into shape....they will be playing like the Spurs of the north...!!!!!!!oh yeahyyyy


Not sure if Rodgers will last that long, Jow.   He talks a good game but .........

By:
Rowan86
When: 07 Oct 12 23:59
JowJow. The only thing sensible I've got from your post is that you can't be 100% certain what the "true price" for an event should be.

That's obviously true. That's why there are markets.

Do you think the whole process of attempting to estimate how often things happen in sporting events is redundant?

If it is redundant, then what is a sensible approach to winning long--term at gambling? Surely the whole point is to try and estimate how often things happen?
By:
jowjow
When: 08 Oct 12 00:03
...personally i think he could be destines foe great things sofaking...i like his philosophy...whether he can get ALL the current Liverpool players to buy into it im not sure.....

but if they give him a couple of years to stamp his philosophy throughout the club...at all levels...maybe Liverpool will be the trailblazers again as in the seventies and eighties.
By:
sofaking
When: 08 Oct 12 00:05

Oct 8, 2012 -- 12:03AM, jowjow wrote:


...personally i think he could be destines foe great things sofaking...i like his philosophy...whether he can get ALL the current Liverpool players to buy into it im not sure.....but if they give him a couple of years to stamp his philosophy throughout the club...at all levels...maybe Liverpool will be the trailblazers again as in the seventies and eighties.


Would you have rathered him over AVB?

By:
Rowan86
When: 08 Oct 12 00:06
CJ70. You have offered absolutely explanation for why SofaKing made that bet other than that he was sh*tting himself about making a loss on the match? Why do you place so much emphasis on the net profit/loss made over bets made on the match when what actually matters is profit/loss made over all bets made on every event?
By:
jowjow
When: 08 Oct 12 00:07
i would have sofa..

though hopefully AVB will prove me wrong.....the signs are pretty good arnt they .....and he is obviously sticking to the spurs way of playing....also love the way we are pressing high up the pitch..very agressive...great so far.
By:
owl4life
When: 08 Oct 12 00:10
Well played Sofaking.
Page 6 of 15  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ... | 15 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com