|
By:
Just seen the highlights,dont think any of the three red cards were justified,i am also unsure why whittaker wasnt red carded at the same time for the studs to the shins of wanyama
As Mr Lennon will say the establishment has robbed Celtic once again Hail Hail Saint Neil |
|
By:
jason-dodd apologises, for thick-headed rudeness..
has this ever happened before? |
|
By:
20:24
this will be the last thing i say, as your threads are getting increasingly tiresome/ridiculous 22.34 Freddiek makes another post. No comment needed ![]() |
|
By:
The Blessed one has called it right, Boughera's bestest buddie was always going to p1ss on our parade. I just hope the lodge go for the treble in the cup because until the Celtic fans realise that the SFA don't do walking away they will have to put up with an uneven playing field forever. This season and next is the time for an away game ban to force the SFA into reform that will guarantee a level field.
|
|
By:
i am also unsure why whittaker wasnt red carded at the same time for the studs to the shins of wanyama
You're right bilko. The only one who was showing any studs was Prince Charles's love child. The only one who didn't get the ball was Prince Charles's love child. The only one who touched the opposing player was Prince Charles's love child. |
|
By:
18 points clear and still seething about referees, you couldn't make it up.
|
|
By:
need to forget referees and accept that we are really not that goood. Reverse the circumstances with the huns going for the title at Celtic Park and we would have capitulated also. We do not do "big" games
|
|
By:
I thought all three reds were fair enough.
First was was a clear tug back denying a goalscoring opportunity. Third was similar. The second was an obvious and unnecessary two footed lunge. No idea why the player was so stupid. Blame the players not the ref. |
|
By:
All 3 were blatant reds.
End of. |
|
By:
An offside goal stood was the only thing that stood between your boys and the humiliation of being unable to beat 9 men joe. Were it not for the SFA's Save-Our-Club committee the Blessed One would be going for 2/2 spl titles. He will do for me.
|
|
By:
Lennon never does himself any favours. Sure there were some poor decisions but to try and make out Celtic were robbed is garbage. The team were poor on the day and Rangers were deserved winners. I don't know why he can't just accept that and move on. I think he's still hurting about losing the league cup and a chance at the treble. Like most managers (and I'm struggling to think of any that can be excluded), he is a bad loser but his trouble is he can't hide it like others.
He needs to look at the bigger picture and be satisfied that his team have strolled to a league title and will be big odds on to win it next season. |
|
By:
FECK
Any games you have lost that the refs not at fault? Maybe you should play without refs,cos the other teams would be delighted that you would nt be given your usual sending off,pen,etc against them. |
|
By:
Wonder what the Blessed One will be given for "manhandling" Bouggie's bestest buddy? If I remember correctly Boughera & Diouff were fined around £750 each (2 hour's wages?) following Murray's testimony that he did not feel intimidated (making them both available for the title run). On that basis the Blessed One could be looking at a 2s/6d fine but wait, maybe Calum was more intimidated this time because the Blessed Neil is an Irish Catholic.
|
|
By:
Platini, I would dispute they were poor on the day. When they had 10 on the park they were the better team. Like I told joe1690, an offside goal stood between Rangers and total embarrassment. Perhaps you and Joe are the ones who should resist knee-jerk reactions.
|
|
By:
The funny thing here is they also blamed the ref when they lost the cup final last week
|
|
By:
Martin O'neil was an Irish catholic.
The difference was he was a gentleman and had a brain. Don't remember Oneil ever having any problems. Feck you are getting more paranoid and deluded by the day. |
|
By:
Not sure we watched the same game then. Celtic created absolutely nothing with 10. They only woke up with 3 minutes left when rangers took their foot off the gas.
|
|
By:
Ranger's must've taken their foot off the gas until they were playing 9 then.
|
|
By:
The difference was he was a gentleman and had a brain.
What's that? Oh yes, it's the sound of a nail being hit smack, bang on the head. |
|
By:
Celtic fans are often described as paranoid, with some justification
but would the runaway winners of any other league have a decent penalty shout go against them when 0-1 down in a cup final against comparative minnows... and then have 2 men sent off and their manager banished to the bowels of the stadium in the very next match? |
|
By:
yes if they deserved it
|
|
By:
Apparently Celtic never, ever get a debatable decision in their favour.
![]() |
|
By:
Feck, they were poor. I've watched them play much better in previous OF games (inc games they lost). They should be taking 4 or 5 off that mob but they looked as if they just expected to win. It's possible they underestimated Rangers (fooled by their recent results) and that is criminal.
|
|
By:
Freddiek seems to suggest Celtic should get decisions merely because they lead their league.
This has to be one of the weakest arguments heard on the football forum. And there is stiff competition. |
|
By:
freddiek 26 Mar 12 12:15
but would the runaway winners of any other league have a decent penalty shout go against them when 0-1 down in a cup final against comparative minnows... and then have 2 men sent off and their manager banished to the bowels of the stadium in the very next match? Real Madrid had Mourinho and 2 men sent off last week. Sh*t happens, as if it's a conspiracy. |
|
By:
Can anybody explain why Martin Oneil,as an Irish catholic never had any problems managing Celtic?
Just wondering as an outsider,cos Feck gives that as the reason Lennon gets in so much trouble. I presume he does'nt have an answer as he keeps ignoring the question. Could it be just Mr.Lennon's attitude? |
|
By:
i'm not suggesting they should get every decision, far from it. But posters like Feck N. Eejit observe scottish football closer than i do
i believe it is genuine when they suggest celtic have on the whole been hard done by in the last two games |
|
By:
Every team is hard done by, if you listen to their fans.
|
|
By:
As a neutral to the game, the refereeing looked very off yet again on RANGERS side. The elbow into the back of Samaras head would have been a red card to a Celtic player if foul had been other way round. Why was the match stopped while ball was in play 10 seconds before injury time was up and after a goal was scored in injury time ? Like last year the police got involved in the game to warn Celtic of trouble that would be caused if Celtic win game. Lennon was sent off even though witnesses say he rightfully questioned referee in a dignified manner. In the cup final the referee still has not answered why no penalty for an obvious stonewall penalty as they come in last minute. It cost people a lot of money. Yesterdays game was a farce and many of them have been in recent years. Lennon has every right to be angry. That referee is truly an odious man. There is no doubt that decisions were made to aid Rangers to avoid there fans causing trouble and damage that would cost a lot of money. Ramgers fans have undoubtedly got that reputation and as a neutral to SPL it would benefit the whole of the game if they just went away altogether as they are just a corrupt club right the way through. Cheaters should never be allowed to win and again yesterday proved something very ugly about life. Any criticism Lennons way is wrong and quite frankly stupid, he should be angry and everybody else should be angry at cheating refs and institutions propping up bank balances of corrupt clubs and game flixers that riddle the once great game.
|
|
By:
You sound totally neutral
![]() |
|
By:
The elbow into the back of Samaras head would have been a red card to a Celtic player if foul had been other way round
I stopped reading after this. So many people use hypothetical situations as fact when trying to put their point across - it's absurd. |
|
By:
Ha ha neutral?! You're worse than Feck!
And your username suggests you've probably got an affiliation with Celtic over Rangers. |
|
By:
Ireland 1 Spain 0
WOW We need more neutrals like you. |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
I wonder will you have these views when you grow up into adults.
|
|
By:
The pundit's "he was denied a goal scoring opportunity" comment that everyone is so keen to parrot is hilarious. If you throw yourself to the ground looking for a penalty you do tend to lose the goal scoring chance. Prince Charles's love child shouldn't just have been sent off for the Wanyama tackle, his holding of Ledley in the penalty box was way more blatant than Cha's failed attempt at holding. Anyone who thinks Murray is a neutral after last season's feats is a fkng nut job. God bless the Blessed One for having the nerve to call it the way it is instead of joining the long line of sheep like clowns who are too afraid to do anything than parrot the pundits. Today all we hear of is "deserved sending offs", "goal scoring opportunies denied" with barely a mention of the offside goal and no mention at all of Whittaker's crimes or the two blatant fouls on Samaras that were totally ignored.
|
|
By:
Players were denied a goalscoring opportunities for the first and hir reds). I don't care what the pundits agreed or not. It's the laws of the game.
|
|
By:
*third
|
|
By:
But Stokes wasn't last week?
|
|
By:
If the ref had thought it was a foul he would probably have produced a red. Rightly or wrongly he didn't think it was a foul.
|