Football
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 360 comments are related to the topic:
Man City v Chelsea,city approx evens
Man City v Chelsea,city approx evens
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 360
|
By:
|
|
By:
billy
 posts about bets and stakes are meaningless. erm nope. it's a betting site primarily, not a football chat forum HTH |
|
By:
RMB please post your stake/bet if so, just to avoid any aftertiming later on the other thread.
thanks chap |
|
By:
bob_terwilliger 21 Mar 12 15:39
RMB - big chance for you here to post a bet pre off. come on shy boy... Unless he posts a screenshot what is the point in this and what will it prove to you? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
if it's pre off and it wins i will salute and revere him tonight.
if it's pre off and it loses i will salute and console him tonight. if it's aftertimed i will hound him to the ends of god's green earth HTH Bizzo  |
|
By:
Ha ha fair enough, you worry far too much about other peoples bets Bob. I'm sure i recall seeing that RMB had about 40k on United to win the league so i doubt he'll be too bothered if his bet tonight loses
|
|
By:
you yourself have mocked RMB's aftertiming in the past have you not? |
|
By:
billy
I'm not asking for a stake. Merely pointing out that if it's so certain that evens is too low, presumably he sees it as a large lay. |
|
By:
bob
Yes, and we are discussing the bet that may or may not place. What has a person's actual bet and stake got to do with it, when by definition, there is no proof to it? |
|
By:
cob - saying that you believe something is irrelevant to the point is a perfectly polite and reasoned comment.
Calling something 'rubbish' is not. Hope this helps. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Interesting response, bob.
Tell me this. What difference would it make to you if I told you my chosen bet and stake, as to whether it's £100 or £10,000? Nothing, that's what. Because the stake is relevant to the bank, which you have no idea about, because it's anonymous. Geddit?  |
|
By:
 still "interesting" Doddy |
|
By:
I'll take that as 'yes, you're right jason'.
Thanks. |
|
By:
You would
|
|
By:
7,6
|
|
By:
"you yourself have mocked RMB's aftertiming in the past have you not?"
Quite possibly a long long time ago, but the whole issue of aftertiming is pointless. If he posts up a bet pre game backing City for 10k, how do you know if he's actually got 10k on, or if he's only got £10 on and has edited it. You don't, so it's pointless asking. The only people i've ever seen prove that they were big hitters on this site are u25k, inner city sumo and undern. Oh and we learnt that TSO was a fantasist. Beyond that, the rest is guesswork. |
|
By:
He's one 7,6 - Mav
|
|
By:
Aftertiming is another fallacy.
If someone wins a bet, is happy about it and wants to tell people, why shouldn't they? The idea that everyone has to post up all their bets or else keep quiet about any wins they might have is ridiculous. |
|
By:
Oh no it isn't
|
|
By:
A well thought out, logical response.
|
|
By:
About as logical as the drivel you just typed
|
|
By:
yep
|
|
By:
Feel free to explain yourself, because currently you sound like a child.
|
|
By:
The only people i've ever seen prove that they were big hitters on this site are u25k, inner city sumo and undern.
how did ICS and Undern prove such? |
|
By:
ICS posted up his entire bankroll on a market and you know how undern proved it because he got you banned!
|
|
By:
how much was his roll?
how was undern proving his bank roll anything to do with banning? |
|
By:
Undern's not a big hitter - not in the truest sense of the phrase. He has some talent, but his discipline was always a big problem. That might have gone away to some extent now he's letting his bot take the strain. He wouldn't have been a 'big hitter' at the time bob got banned though.
|
|
By:
bob_terwilliger 21 Mar 12 16:50
how much was his roll? how was undern proving his bank roll anything to do with banning? Over 500k That's not what i said. But you know how and why he got you banned because i saw TSO explain it to you. Unless TSO was lying of course. |
|
By:
completely unrelated, big hitter or not
|
|
By:
remind me what TSO's theory was and i'll then tell you whether true or not please Bizzo mate
|
|
By:
bob, you don't know yourself.
|
|
By:
i do Bobbin. why wouldn't i
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
go on Bizzo, why did Undern undertake the banning according our departed friend, TSO?
|
|
By:
*to
|
|
By:
bob, you claim you got banned because you swore at Undern. If that's really the reason, then it must mean that Undern is a big hitter and has real clout with the betfair people. Only a big hitter could get somebody banned because they swore at them!
I personally don't believe Undern has that sort of clout. And I don't believe you got banned because you swore at somebody. That's ridiculous. |
|
By:
good post Bobbin.
Bizzo? |
|
By:
Erm... I just said the reason you've given several times in the past for having been banned (because you swore at Undern) was a load of old rubbish. And you call that a good post??? You are a strange one Paul..
|