|
By:
|
|
By:
It is a low price but there are a lot of overs, no chance of play lost to bad light, England batted crap on their first dig, they look terrible, they are playing crap shots and the NZ bowlers are pumped, and NZ get another new ball and another chance under lights..... good luck. That said, I do not back short odds.
|
|
By:
NZ would have been 2.3/2.4 overnight without Root's wicket. That's a massive move, felt too much and I opposed it
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
lose only one this session...its a bit differernt then
|
|
By:
It will move really quickly in the first few overs if there isn't a wicket
|
|
By:
some people still didnt change the time perhaps
![]() |
|
By:
I remember a similar position to this in one of the aus matches and it was over within an hour
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZLDFq2XkAAZ0qs.jpg
from 5 years ago |
|
By:
if engerland had joe root at the crease this wouldve been intersting
|
|
By:
where are the draw backers ffs
|
|
By:
Jeremy Coney & Brian Waddell say it's an absolute belter still
|
|
By:
Coney on about rough outside the lefties' off stump. More over analysing from the Kiwi comms
|
|
By:
It had flipped minutes before Root was out, NZ were then 1.43ish for a long time after stumps, now they are trading at 1.29
![]() |
|
By:
Even 1.28 was matched just now.
|
|
By:
never seen anything like it, almost like an extra wicket after stumps!
|
|
By:
did root break his finger?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
if there was only one ball left could he have retired hurt and shove a tailendeer out there?
|
|
By:
then come back 2day
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
In fact if he'd retired hurt, it would have been stumps
|
|
By:
braindead engerland |
|
By:
500 staff and not one brain between them
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
It should have been taken out of Root's hands by the mgmt/staff. They had plenty of time to assess the situation as it took an age to look at his finger
|
|
By:
He has gone down in my estimation, he cried off in Aus too, when he had the sh1ts
|
|
By:
thats crazy, so they had physios out there looking at his finger and not one of them realised there was one more ball left in the day and retire him
|
|
By:
not a brain between them your correct |
|
By:
|
|
By:
6 wickets, 3 sessions. 2 wickets per session. what are the odds?
|
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
o yeah, sorry, getting totally confused here. Thanks
|
|
By:
I'm out again now, squeaky bum time for 10 mins, but almost got all that shocking pre trading back
![]() |
|
By:
shouldn't and I emphasise shouldn't be back to back wickets on this. Therefore laying after a wicket should be profitable
|
|
By:
just imagine these 2 get through the first hour
|