CR17 Group A: Australia v New Zealand at Birmingham > Betfair Community

Betfair Community

Home › Cricket Forum › CR17 Group A: Australia v New Zealand at Birmingham

Switch to Community Classic App Directory

Cricket

‹ back to topics

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.

These 357 comments are related to the topic:
CR17 Group A: Australia v New Zealand at Birmingham

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

Page 6 of 9 • Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Replies: 357

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:43

Taylor averages 56 in ODI cricket since 2014.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:43

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:43PM, frog2 wrote:

Taylor averages 56 in ODI cricket since 2014.

yeh brilliant, at what strike rate

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:43

83.2

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:44

To compare Steve Smith averages 51.3 with a strike rate of 87.9.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:45

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:43PM, frog2 wrote:

83.2

so basically identical what he got 2day....so he played his normal game then....thought u said the pitch was tough???

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:45

Taylor plays in NZ which gets lower totals than in OZ

By:

Fatslogger When: 02 Jun 17 15:45

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:43PM, frog2 wrote:

Taylor averages 56 in ODI cricket since 2014.

To be fair, he did accelerate today too, although SR under 80 a bit feeble.

This is why you should back batting side if they lose late wickets, by the way, isn't it?

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:46

Because he usually plays in NZ Grant. 300 is the norm in England now. Not so in NZ.

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 02 Jun 17 15:47

Roscoe lost his power with a very bad arm or shoulder injury, never been the same, when he was playing for Durham years ago and early IPL he was a different kettle of fish to what he is now!

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:47

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:46PM, frog2 wrote:

Because he usually plays in NZ Grant. 300 is the norm in England now. Not so in NZ.

u need to stop talking, so if the pitch is so hard as u say, why did u expect them to go at 12 an over????

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:47

When did i say that?

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:47

I said they needed that.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:47

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:11PM, frog2 wrote:

8 overs left. Need to go for it now. 12 an over gets them to 335 which might be enough.

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:48

NEED. Not expect

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:48

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:15PM, frog2 wrote:

12 Grant not 10.

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:48

Is English your first language?

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:48

keep on speaking sh it m8

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:48

You seem really angry.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:49

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:48PM, frog2 wrote:

You seem really angry.

I am, I backed NZ overs and lost because they cant time an innings properly

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:49

I can admit I got it wrong tho, seems u cant tho

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:50

I backed them as well.

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:50

I still think they have a chance.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:50

not sure when the last time I saw a final 15 overs as bad as that

By:

tomtimtum When: 02 Jun 17 15:50

Complete garbage, well short on this runway

By:

Charlie When: 02 Jun 17 15:50

I'm a bit angry. Two-thirds of profits disappeared in last hour or so. Not sure what to do now.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:51

7 wickets for 41 runs

By:

tomtimtum When: 02 Jun 17 15:51

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:50PM, frog2 wrote:

I still think they have a chance.

They have 300 odd, of course they have a chance. The fact is they were in a fantastic position to go heavy favourites and completely messed it up

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 15:51

They are back to the price after the toss.

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 15:54

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:51PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:50PM, frog2 wrote:I still think they have a chance.They have 300 odd, of course they have a chance. The fact is they were in a fantastic position to go heavy favourites and completely messed it up

exactly this, from the position they were in they shoudlve got minimum 330

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 02 Jun 17 15:54

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:50PM, Charlie wrote:

I'm a bit angry. Two-thirds of profits disappeared in last hour or so. Not sure what to do now.

Same Boat... But I reversed onto Aus at 1.59 at 15.30...I can foresee trouble ahead with Davy & Finchy high risk approach already started scaling out!

By:

Fatslogger When: 02 Jun 17 15:54

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:51PM, tomtimtum wrote:

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:50PM, frog2 wrote:I still think they have a chance.They have 300 odd, of course they have a chance. The fact is they were in a fantastic position to go heavy favourites and completely messed it up

Think Aus would have very much remained in the market even chasing 330 but I think this gives NZ a shot I'd price at about 2.5, although I'm not taking any more on at 3, having just missed a trade back out just under 2.6.

By:

Fatslogger When: 02 Jun 17 15:57

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:54PM, GRANTCKING wrote:

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:51PM, tomtimtum wrote:Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:50PM, frog2 wrote:I still think they have a chance.They have 300 odd, of course they have a chance. The fact is they were in a fantastic position to go heavy favourites and completely messed it upexactly this, from the position they were in they shoudlve got minimum 330

Even from just before Williamson out, which is picking your moment rather, 330 was a fair ask. Bit much to call it a minimum and as I say, that's picking their very best position all innings.

By:

Cardinal Scott When: 02 Jun 17 16:01

Finchy has a poor technique, this is a poor Aus price sub 1.5.. I'm getting out completely

By:

Fatslogger When: 02 Jun 17 16:04

Jun 2, 2017 -- 4:01PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:

Finchy has a poor technique, this is a poor Aus price sub 1.5.. I'm getting out completely

If the new balls swing could be NZ 1.5 rather quickly (in which case I'll probably be out).

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 16:04

My thought were it looked a hard pitch to accelerate on. I was clearly wrong. It was just poor batting when they tried to accelerate?

By:

ayt When: 02 Jun 17 16:06

Super 1st 2 matches for 320 layers

By:

tomtimtum When: 02 Jun 17 16:07

oh my, AYT returns

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 16:08

Jun 2, 2017 -- 4:04PM, frog2 wrote:

My thought were it looked a hard pitch to accelerate on. I was clearly wrong. It was just poor batting when they tried to accelerate?

why did NZ go from favs to big outsiders in the last 10 overs in ur opininon?

By:

GRANTCKING When: 02 Jun 17 16:10

if the pitch was "tough" as you say, the market wouldve expected the collapso no?

By:

frog2 When: 02 Jun 17 16:11

The market clearly thought there would not be a collapse. Maybe it thought Anderson would score quickly at the next wicket?

Page 6 of 9 • Previous | 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next

sort by:

Show per page

Switch to Live View refresh Post Reply

Post your reply

‹ back to topics