|
By:
I'd have the draw at 3.75, and perhaps 3.95 if the lack of floodlights is properly factored in - not much effect IMO.
Not complaining, I laid the draw as low as 3.05. |
|
By:
one big mistake people make with the weather, is just looking at the forecast for the place in question. its much more relevant what the forecast is for the entire country.
quite often it will say showers for one city, but if you look at the forecast for the entire country its just for a few showers dotted about the place. usually they either miss completely or blow through quickly. day 5 at OT was different in that heavy rain was forecast for nearly the entire country. much less likely to miss or blow through. |
|
By:
early days but the forecast at the moment looks virtually clear the entire 5 days except sunday. and that doesnt look too bad at the moment.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/2650628 |
|
By:
click on united kingdom. the bit of cloud or rain forecast around durham on monday is about the only bit of cloud in the entire country apart from one lower down. usually that turns out to be nothing.
the forecast is for fairly hot temperatures all 5 days, a sign that prolonged rain is unlikely. sunday 20c, monday 19c. forecasts are unreliable and change, but right now they dont have anything in them to suggest any rain of note. |
|
By:
People saying that not enforcing the follow on cost Aust victory. Could have made 600 in another 15 or so overs had Clarke batted on in first innnings. Bowled eng out for 368 in 140 overs. Enforced follow on and would need to bowl eng out in maybe 50 overs on a 4 day pitch (would have bowled 10 more overs than the Eng over rate). Not going to happen often - very harsh on Clarke captaincy. 340 overs is not enough when the first innings' takes up 280 of them.
|
|
By:
I agree with much of what you say sideshow in terms of looking at the forecast for the entire country, however when looking at the UK LR weather forecasts, the story can often paint a picture where on the basis of Air Pressure, those specific county areas are shown to bear out accurate forecasts. I think this is one of those instances, and therefore believe there will be rain affecting the match enough to warrant some draw insurance.
|
|
By:
Seems like weather forecasting is less accurate (more difficult) in UK than Aust. Three day forecasts are pretty accurate in OZ but any further out is guesswork. But the forecasts for Manchester seemed like guesswork rather than anything meaningful - was this an one off or is that usual.
From previous county scores seems like a 4 day test might be enough to get a result but curators probably spend more time and effort to get a decent test pitch up to a good standard than a county fixture. They definitely have a financial incentive to provide a decent batting strip. Still doesn't seem like a high scoring ground. |
|
By:
Bobo,
I don't think there is much criticism of Clarke. Some people, like me are just pointing out that the best chance Aus had for winning the last game was by enforcing the follow on. Rain was due and to be fair precious little fell till Monday afternoon. It could have rained from Friday. Clarke had a decision to make. Personally I felt he should have pushed on when he had two batsmen set fair. Some say he was vindicated by taking two early England wickets, I don't. I would not criticise him for that per se but am pointing out in hindsight a bit more foresight would have helped. The second point is that England avoided the follow on when they were 110-4. In hindsight again admittedly this saved England. There is plenty of whinging from Aussies that the weather saved England. Yes it did but that is part of the game. You can imagine some of them jumping up and down yelling it's not fair! Looking forward to this game. Have layed the draw ante post small. Will be keen to see the pitch and who wins the toss. Just because I think England are a much better side does not mean I don't think Australia can win this game given the right conditions! |
|
By:
Bobojon, basically all northern hemisphere forecasts are less reliable than southern hemisphere forecasts because there is much more land in the NH, plus the UK is near a boundary between 2 climate zones.
I bet I can predict the weather for the Perth Ashes Test in 5 months time with 80% accuracy. Anyone like to take me on? My forecast for day 1 is hot and sunny. |
|
By:
don't tell me pxb,
it'll be windy in the afternoon ? |
|
By:
Yep. Breeze will kick in around 3:30pm.
|
|
By:
Bugger me if I have been waiting for the game to start today!
I guess I am a traditionalist! What next pyjama's? |
|
By:
i thought the match started today. im going crazy!
phukin friday starts ![]() |
|
By:
SH weather for Australia is driven by the Pacific Ocean, particularly the cooling and warming sea surface temps of the Western Pacific, in what is termed as the 'three phases of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)'. Presently, Australia is in the La Nina phase, with increased convection over Australia and therefore the likelihood of above-average rainfall along the East Coast and the interior. However, ENSO does not affect the West Coast of Australia. For Perth weather, predicting the 'hemispheric long wave pattern' or the study of troughs along the longitudes of South Africa, Western Australia, New Zealand, the south Pacific, the southeast Pacific, and the Atlantic Ocean is a much more accurate starting point. The rain events which are a major factor for Perth are those originating in the tropics, however by mid-December the period of the 3rd Test at the WACA, it may be a tad too early in the summer for a tropical influence bringing rain-bearing systems, and thus an 80% success of accurately predicting a warm, sunny, and dry for 5 days seems spot on.
Yes, the prediction of weather for the UK is made much more difficult for a variety of factors, however the British Isles are more predictably wet, and this combined with the LR Air Pressure studies, the predictions can become be quite accurate, especially when discussed in the context of rain affecting a 5 day cricket match, which I think is likely. Cheers, SP |
|
By:
local weather forecast suggests rain over night and until about 9 am tomorrow, that should see a start on time, just
then weather decent fri, sat, sunday.........not such a good forecast monday and tues , but thats still changing |
|
By:
Starting off with a bet on Eng again. The stats point to a result. Not a high scoring pitch. Eng 4 from 4 here, but against lesser teams, if we're honest. Aus pulled one out of the bag last test, but Eng have yet to have all batsmen firing, and if finally everyone puts in a decent performance, I can see the Aussies being put to bed. Don't forget, before this series was the champions trophy etc etc. Aus have been poor for ages and one 'good' result doesn't mean they've turned a corner in 3 weeks.
|
|
By:
England yet to have all batsman firing LOL ffs Australia have had one batsman fire one shot
|
|
By:
sun just breaking through looks like another nice day!! Enjoy...
|
|
By:
lay the draw, fancy plenty of wickets to fall the fist two days. dont think the weather will be a factor in this test match
|
|
By:
will england make any changes?
|
|
By:
Lots of talk of Onions coming in. Got a lot of wickets here. Harris prob out for Aus, poss with Bird to replace. But I haven't actually seen any team news.
|
|
By:
who will onions replace?
|
|
By:
Average first innings score here around 260, so I'm expecting some ACTION this morning!!
|
|
By:
Anderson? Broad was looking lame?
|
|
By:
where is everyones money pre toss?
|
|
By:
oz win toss and field = my guess
|
|
By:
is win the toss and field ever really an option?
|
|
By:
I think the market will overreact to early wickets, so if Aus win and bat, I'll be on Eng. If Eng bat, I'll wait to get a nice price at 150/4 or something.
|
|
By:
IB says Anderson is present though...
|
|
By:
yeah ive layed the draw, cant see australia batting over 220 overs in the match
|
|
By:
bird for starc is being reported
|
|
By:
Is Ian Ward a dwarf ? everyone he stands next to looks 7 foot tall.
|
|
By:
only pre start bet is on the aussies to get a first innings lead....2.52 has to be value
|
|
By:
Vaughan says no Jimmy...
|
|
By:
Not sure Posy. I haven't seen much evidence of Aus being able to bat on anything but a flat pitch...
|
|
By:
So does TMS. Didn't warm up apparently.
|
|
By:
Having failed to get 3.2 opposing the draw yesterday I am going to wait, watch and see.
I think England will be too strong this time out. They have had their bad match and their Holy Trinity of Cook, Trott and Prior will be looking to make a contribution this time out. Again I will be interested to see if England can make the ball reverse. The pitch may be dry but the outfield if likely to be lush and even damp. I am not going to put money on the team that wins the toss straight away either as both side have good pace attacks and a clatter of wickets may occur regardless of who is first up. Watch and see as usual. |
|
By:
Problem being 450 overs is in a match. Aus bat 220 overs, England need 275 to match the score. Need to get Aus out in less than 195 overs. Not 220.
|
|
By:
England unchanged!
|