RockMonkey
I must have missed the development that makes Eradicate's hand-picked stats any less nonsensical or irrelevant. I liked the leap he has since made into Pietersen being on the take though-I imagine the thought of such made him verily froth at the mouth

From where do you get that I have taken that leap?  I can't even recall what I wrote, but I doubt it indicated I had made that leap.

Kweer squad was a good one too, inasmuch as it helps pin down his nationality and age
I also wonder if it was a touching ceremony when he & berto signed up to the forum together, hand in hand perhaps?

What does the nationality and age of a person who posts here matter?  Are you suggesting that Berto and I know each other, or that we are the same person, or what?  Apologies if I am missing something, I find this part of your post strange in the extreme.

I am still waiting for an answer to my question about a) what is in the texts and b) how they got in the public domain.

From whom?  We are all waiting for that.  Are you incapable of stating a case based on a hypothetically understanding?  The texts either contained something treasonous or they didn't.  It is available to you to take a different position based on each scenario.

Everything else I have said on this thread I happily stand by, which I doubt all can in the light of yesterday's revelations that, despite earlier reports, the texts contained no details of how to bowl to Strauss and praised several England players?

Would you not think that if the texts contained nothing damaging, Pietersen might have shown them willingly to the ECB, or at least explained what was in them?


Probably best to ignore that I would say (from the Mirror btw) as it doesn't quite fit in with the narrative.

I am happy to consider what you write and respond to it, despite you having a differing view on certain aspects from my own.  Wouldn't it defeat the purpose of being active on a public forum to do anything else?

I think we are going to need a bigger boat!

Among the bollox in the 20 Aug 10.28 diatribe we have Eradicate linking Pietersen with being a crook, unless the line 'Would he have been corruptible', has some other meaning?

It is one thing clogging the forum up with the sh1te Eradicate does but at least have the bottle to stand by what you say.
I am more than happy to stand by everything I have said on the thread thus far if Eradicate has any points to make about those comments.
I don't think I'll get involved though in discussing questions regarding whatever wild scenario the poor lad's imagination next dreams up