Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 607 comments are related to the topic:
Sussex v Kent
Sussex v Kent
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 607
|
By:
11 bowls and out
19 need and last wicket.  |
|
By:
W
|
|
By:
Parnell or bust then. 2 sixes lol
|
|
By:
Panesar to come on and hit 3 6's
|
|
By:
19 needed off 11. In walks Monty.
|
|
By:
But PARNAL ON THE STRIKE.
|
|
By:
at least three boundaries going to be needed
|
|
By:
Batsmen crossed. Parnell in strike
|
|
By:
Come on Sussex got a massive massive green on them, would love them to win, please!
|
|
By:
Arif killed this
|
|
By:
belly flop
 |
|
By:
10 BOWLS AND 2 runs. 17 need
|
|
By:
DROPPED
2222222 17/10 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
lol
|
|
By:
dot.
|
|
By:
Full
Parnell tries to guide it but misses 17 off 9 |
|
By:
2 runs........... 8 to 15
|
|
By:
Parnell clouts a 85 mph bumper for 2
15/8 |
|
By:
Parnell nisses
15/7 |
|
By:
Out Game over..................
But nice wins Good Night   |
|
By:
Scooped and caught at long on
All out Only Parnell, Nash and Monty look 100% clean here. Leather jackets for the rest of this vile Sussex XI. |
|
By:
"kent take the money".
not the wisest or most astute piece of commentary at the end there. |
|
By:
Bad bad night for bavtcc.
|
|
By:
Could have easily got that total
|
|
By:
should have pissed it but hard when at least two of your bats are playing for the oppo.
Disgusting stuff from Sussex. Wonder if Ekkers was watching that? |
|
By:
What was the shortest Sussex traded during the chase?
|
|
By:
1.18 [smiley:crazy]
|
|
By:
Lot of money traded tonight eh?
|
|
By:
Ffs I decided to go out and watch the football (which I also ended on wrong side of) because I thought I was just getting spooked by it all market looked fine at about 1.66 when I left sussex roughly 20/0 after 3..and I didnt wanna just give my green away, dont half wish I had stayed and traded
|
|
By:
looked a team effort to me
|
|
By:
hi guys,can I safely assume this match was fixed ? I am new to english county..is it normal here for matches to get fixed lyk this without no investigation?
|
|
By:
No its not normal imo for english county cricket to be fixed, and although I could be accused of pocket talking as I lost quite badly on the game I dont think I am when I say it looked very very suspicious (not for the 1st time with sussex)_
|
|
By:
At times you know a thing but do not talk about it. English county is not that badly infected than others [;)]
|
|
By:
fix
|
|
By:
Does that mean you don't think it was fixed Alfie?
The market made it look like it was,you have to admit. |
|
By:
maybe a couple of dubious batmans dismissals but i dont agree the match was fixed.
|
|
By:
Not for the first time , Murray Goodwin and his band of bandits get the lot
Looked 100% Blatant imo , just chucked wickets away |
|
By:
What about the prices Alfie46? Do you really think Kent should have been odds on at 18/1 and 70 odd for 3?? Or should Sussex have been as big as 1.5 when they were 70 odd for 1 chasing?
|
|
By:
the toss was massive,batting first almost a result decider in itself and at 70/1 the market was then questioning the importance it initally attached to that reasoning imo
|