Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
InsiderTrader
09 May 20 07:02
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Aug 05
| Topic/replies: 14,569 | Blogger: InsiderTrader's blog
UK airlines say they have been told the government will bring in a 14-day quarantine for anyone arriving in the UK from any country apart from the Republic of Ireland in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

The new restriction is expected to take effect at the end of this month.

Industry body Airlines UK said the policy needed "a credible exit plan" and should be reviewed weekly.

People arriving in the UK would have to self-isolate at a private residence.

Government and aviation sources told BBC News that the quarantine would mean people might be expected to provide an address when they arrive at the border.

It is not clear how long the new travel restriction would be in place and whether non-UK residents would be allowed to stay in rented private accommodation.

"We need to see the details of what they are proposing", said Airlines UK, which represents British Airways, EasyJet and other UK-based airlines, in a statement.

Aviation minister Kelly Tolhurst is expected to clarify the policy to airline and airport representatives in a conference call scheduled for Saturday morning.

UK airports suggested that a quarantine "would not only have a devastating impact on the UK aviation industry, but also on the wider economy".

Karen Dee from the Airport Operators Association, which represents most UK airports, said the measure should be applied "on a selective basis following the science" and "the economic impact on key sectors should be mitigated".

BBC News understands that key workers such as lorry drivers who transport goods and people working in the shipping industry would be exempt.

^

What a complete waste of time when over 10m people in the UK already got/had the virus.

Unless we do this forever it will be meaningless.

Unless we have no exceptions it will not work.

Asking people to self-isolate at home simply will not happen.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 134
By:
nineteen points
When: 09 May 20 07:38
totally agree IT

been watching on news.watered down it says,still come in no hassle.do me a favour mate and stay in like the plebs here and mind if you dont we might fine you.tough new measures by this tough decision making government
By:
mrcombustible
When: 09 May 20 08:00
Another crazy decision by Doris.
By:
doridoru
When: 09 May 20 08:06
Must admit ABS CRAZY
By:
doridoru
When: 09 May 20 08:07
While 100s of muzzies coming over the channel every day Surprised
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 09 May 20 08:10
Words fail me.
By:
dave1357
When: 09 May 20 08:22
What a complete waste of time when over 10m people in the UK already got/had the virus.

I thought you said that virus contagion wasn't exponential?  It would have to be if 10m people were infected.
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 09 May 20 08:22
Regardless the intention, i think the effect of this is to strongly discourage business trips and tourists, isnt it?

Certainly not going to help on the economic side. Uncertain what it will do on the virus side
By:
twizzle22
When: 09 May 20 08:23
IF( and i have my doubts) they are ever asked the question why now...why not back in Feb it will be of great interest to to hear their answer.
Originally, when asked ,the answer was ...well...the virus is already here so the risk of further contamination is small.

             SO WHAT'S CHANGED???
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 09:03
Pretty basis maths twizzle22.
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 09:12
The economic argument is a very thin one, there's not much incentive for tourists to come to the UK to spend money anyway. What are they going to spend money on even if they are willing to travel to another country at this time? Obviously most people won't be going abroad from the UK this year either and it will be the same for other developed nations.
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 09:24
Reducing the risk of imported cases also provides flexibility to relax lockdown adjustments in other areas.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 09 May 20 09:40
3 months too late. more evidence to use in the impending trials.
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 09:50
I realise it's a relatively obvious point but we've all been in lockdown anyway. This is more significant when the measures are eased.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 09 May 20 09:57
its not enforceable.
if and obviously don't know ins and outs, it stipulates, the address where you advise you are staying in quarantine for 14 days can be checked at any time to ensure adherence then fair enough. a fine of say 10k if person  not present at time of check/raid .
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 10:14
It's a disincentive predominantly, if it comes to fruition. One would expect airlines and airports to be against a measure designed to restrict travel.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 09 May 20 10:18
they are, airline organisations already kicking off about it.
By:
politicspunter
When: 09 May 20 10:18
We should have shut down everything from the start, flights in/out, ferries eg, the lot. If we had done so, as an island, we perhaps now would be virtually virus free and could start sensibly a managed reactivation of the economy.
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 10:22
It was estimated 1.8 million British nationals were abroad at the time of lockdown. The mistake was allowing people to leave the country once the issues covid 19 were going to cause became apparent.
By:
InsiderTrader
When: 09 May 20 10:22
morpteh mackem
09 May 20 08:57
Joined: 05 Jan 04
| Topic/replies: 40,307 | Blogger: morpteh mackem's blog
its not enforceable.
if and obviously don't know ins and outs, it stipulates, the address where you advise you are staying in quarantine for 14 days can be checked at any time to ensure adherence then fair enough. a fine of say 10k if person  not present at time of check/raid .

^

Massive breech of civil liberties of a western democracy to do that.
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 10:28

May 9, 2020 -- 10:18AM, morpteh mackem wrote:


they are, airline organisations already kicking off about it.


To put it bluntly, most airlines are fooked anyway. Travel is likely never going to fully recover, ergo we need less of everything going forward. It's terrible for those affected but many in those industries are going to need a change of career.

By:
Crisp77
When: 09 May 20 10:33
So 2 weeks holiday means 2 weeks locked in a hotel on arrival and 2 weeks locked in hotel on return.
By:
Angoose
When: 09 May 20 10:40
Where do I sign Grin
By:
nineteen points
When: 09 May 20 10:44
these arent holiday makers.make no mistake these are holders of british passports among others who want to be here because they know they will be far better off here than their "home" country. lets stop beating about the bush.

i can just see 15k policemen a day knocking on doors to see if there in the house. howay man its feckin laughable
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 10:52
I have no issue with British passport holders returning if they feel they are better off here, on commercial flights.
By:
nineteen points
When: 09 May 20 10:55
even infected ones?
By:
Cider
When: 09 May 20 11:05
Not evidently infected people no. Presumably that's why they are considering introducing a 14 day quarantine.
By:
1st time poster
When: 09 May 20 11:13
meanwhile pritti greets record number,s of migrants at dover with canapes and champagne is their anyone not loving this far left government,free money,warm welcome to illegal migrants,fruit pickers flown in business class, 80% free wages,free grants,unions dictating public sector policy,and to cap it all THE SAJ says taxes shouldn't rise to pay for it all,who new the magic money forrest was in no10,11,s garden aLL ALONG,LaughLaugh
By:
Racingqueen
When: 09 May 20 11:14
The most brain dead decision I have ever seen.

How long are they going to be enforcing this brain fart for?
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 May 20 11:15
Gotta follow the scienceShocked
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 May 20 11:16
.........and so the dunfukkery continues
By:
Crisp77
When: 09 May 20 11:17
Does the same apply for cruises? I read yesterday the virus can be carried by seamen.
By:
Get me a drink
When: 09 May 20 11:17
Might as well listen to the baked potato than the almighty 'science' for all the good it does
By:
1st time poster
When: 09 May 20 11:18
like lockdown once its started how do you stop it,airlines will be going out of business after a couple of weeks,wont want bailouts,no holiday bookings, no rush to open up again LaughLaughLaugh,

does it apply to pritti,s record numbers coming in at dover, LaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
1st time poster
When: 09 May 20 11:20
if there,s no one wanting to come in
pritti helping migrants at dover,pritti flying in migrant fruit pickers
no tory,s wanting trade deals with china
is their any point in Brexit, LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
Whisperingdeath
When: 09 May 20 11:22
I have to say though what a great job Dorris is doing
By:
1st time poster
When: 09 May 20 11:26
greatest prime minister in labours history, LaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
impossible123
When: 09 May 20 11:31
Still 3 months late. Why end of May, why not as from this coming monday?
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 09 May 20 11:32
Once we get to the point where we let pubs, hotels and restaurants open here, then we have to impose quarantine on visitors from infected countries, else it will rise up again.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 09 May 20 11:34
Why end of May, why not as from this coming monday?   Because we are currently in lockdown, so won't make a material difference
Page 1 of 4  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com