Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 167 comments are related to the topic:
ROBERT JENRICK
ROBERT JENRICK
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 167
|
By:
how dare the crypto fascist new progressives on here tell a bloke he can't visit his family
fascists to a man from the guardianistas |
|
By:
What happened to the local community delivery service? His parents were on their list and already being helped. He cannot gallivant from one property to the next in this climate - minister or no minister. I hope this's signed his political death-nail.
A former MP described him as "arrogantly selfish". |
|
By:
Hey moisok, as you are a little red book holding, Labour Party member of forty five years standing, do you support Jenrick having three houses, letting one out and travelling back and forwards with his family between them under the current guidelines?
|
|
By:
I would like as many houses as possible - it is a good idea to let out your property for holidays but not sure about long term lets.
Another friend of mine has three but uses two several months of the year. Property can be a very good investment over time as well as soccerball betting. Fascist new progressives like your lot fantasypunter would stop us from doing anything at any time any where in normal times. You simply hate opposition. Your way is the only way - we know your type |
|
By:
As a conservative voter as I am myself,
moisok, as you are a little red book holding, Labour Party member of forty five years standing, do you support Jenrick having three houses, letting one out and travelling back and forwards with his family between them under the current guidelines? |
|
By:
PP I was expecting a thank you on the "OAKES" thread , have you no manners ??
 |
|
By:
I am not defending anyone.
I am asking the general question... should ministers and others doing essential work be allowed see their kids during lockdown if their work is in a different location to where their family is living? I notice none of the haters are willing to answer that one. |
|
By:
Are his parents 3 monthers ?? My Mo in law is not had to get her Shopping yestrday , the cupboards were bare ...
|
|
By:
Hey Case. Is your wife's maiden name Hubbard?
|
|
By:
and does your MiL have a dog?
|
|
By:
its the complete and utter arrogance,entitlement that stinks ,everyone elese either in jest or een serious when they put their shoes wonders,jokes with wife that's your 2nd dog walk today etc etc,but this fella is driving round the country doping more miles than alan whiker,visiting more houses than a postman and thinks he,s doing nothing wrong and justifies it by saying its within the guidelines,whilst the rest of us arnt even visiting parents,grandkids,grandparents within a mile of us,if he doesn't go forget what any government minister, pcplod telling you there are no guidelines ,at least no guidelines that cant be explained away,
plod don't give him a visit buyt fgind tgime to tell a bloke he cant sit in his own garden and searching peoples shopping basket, predict civil un rest shortly |
|
By:
raab could sack him but wont because he,s one of doris,s best friend s, another tory failing rees mugs intelligent test
|
|
By:
Dog yes , Hubbard no Tril
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
despite lord rees mugs opinion I,m pretty convinced that every single cabinet minister ,would giving enough rope,all of
got burned alive in Grenfell all managed to catch the virus and all managed to break their own lockdown guidelines and social distancing rules, rees mugg must be highly embarrassed to be forced to sit around a table with them,  |
|
By:
So what about this Jenrick fella, Case? Has he actually done a Calderwood or is it just the usual suspects talking pish? I've not been following the story.
|
|
By:
I think people who have made a pile deserve their higher status in life. If you ain't then it is tough luck and you ain't going to get any of mine so just stow it.
|
|
By:
Thees mps are the ones that have been caught!
How many say one thing and then do the opposite? It's almost as if they don't truly believe what they are told to say on covid! |
|
By:
|
|
By:
he,ll go for lying now anyway probably because he,s calling the house their at their main home despite everyone who no,s him,paperwork etc think his Newark house is his main house away from London,the journo,s now checking kids school arrangements,council tax arrangements,commons expenses claims etc etc,
expect more u turns,clarifications and probably resignation eventually ,best go before he embarrasses best friend doris ,during his recovery |
|
By:
He apparently claims for the Newark house, £2k a month rent.
|
|
By:
!st time i don't get your post sorry your grandma is worser than wot mine iz
|
|
By:
handjob hancock rejoins the fun and games, by asking 10 of his staff into his small office breaking every social distancing rule seems to be a common theme with nhs staff and workers,all absolute morons,obviously hancock as he,s told us all,thinks he,s superman now and wont get it again,so couldn't give a fooook
|
|
By:
to be fair to jenrick in years gone by he,d have been in a bunker with ann Widdicombe ,not the worst outcome to be locked away with pritti patel,
|
|
By:
Thank goodness no one from my party has broken any rules.
|
|
By:
Will be interesting to see who has drawn the short draw to attend todays briefing.
Equally interesting to see if they continue with the recently introduced courtesy of allowing journalists a follow up question |
|
By:
3 cabinet ministers plus their advisor have had the symptoms of Covid-19; Hancock'd recovered, Bojo's reportedly getting better and Gove in isolation. No news about the advisor DC, which means there's a weak link in the chain of government regards Covid-19 virus.
I'd expect ministers and others doing "essential" work be allowed to see their kids during lockdown. Nevertheless, it has to been kept to a minimal for fear of contracting the virus. If one is a member of the inner cabinet responsible for making the day-to-day decision about Covid-19 then probably not esp given 3 cabinet members have been struck down with the symptoms; the more exposure to unrelated people the more chance of getting the virus. And, if the MP/cabinet minister is advising the public about the ways to minimise the chance of contracting Covid-19 like Mr Jenrick is then the answer will be no, "he must not gallivant from his work place to the family home everyday" for his own sake, his family's sake, the cabinet and people he'd be meeting in the coming days. If so, he ought to be working from home as much as possible. I'm sure a better way could have been found. |
|
By:
That makes sense impossible.
Same for doctors and nurses. Should they really see their family between shifts? |
|
By:
handjob got todays gig,jenrick must be worried handjob would sell his grandma if he thought it was of benefit to himself,
|
|
By:
The government’s daily coronavirus press briefing is due to begin shortly and will be fronted by the health secretary Matt Hancock.
He will be joined by the deputy chief medical officer for England, Jonathan Van-Tam and the chief nursing officer for England, Ruth May. |
|
By:
who,d have thought in the midst of a world crisis handjob would manage to give his 500th shout out to burberry,the chavs and football hoolies must be gutted
|
|
By:
Some doctors esp those treating Covid-19 patients have been living apart from their families so that they do not infect them; some hospital nurses on the frontline and carers in care homes have done the same too as far as I know. This is a sensible course of action.
And, I hope these NHS staff and carers who are risking their lives daily will as a token of appreciation for their sterling work in this health crisis a meaningful financial reward and a certificate to recognise the role they each play after this crisis. |
|
By:
North East & Yorkshire appears the slowest (to catch on).
|
|
By:
probably more likely to be the last to be hit
|
|
By:
bearing in mind what the spokespeople have said today lets get to the question ... why did Jenrick flout the rules
|
|
By:
yeah as nearly 1000 people had their deaths recorded being covid 19 positive, the priority question is why a minister traveled home
 |
|
By:
No ruth, laura or pest today, the small things.
|
|
By:
if enough people keep flouting the rules which is likely when supposedly able (sic) ministers are allowed to crcumvent them it is a relevant question
the number of deaths will go down when EVERYBODY abides by the rules |
|
By:
If any minister flouted the rules I would quite agree. Travelling home to his wife and three kids is not quite a house party.
|
|
By:
LBC ask about inbound flights. Minister and experts say no point in stopping the flights. Why?
Because the virus is already here...  So we can’t drive to a park but an Italian can fly here unchecked. Utter garbage. Lies lies and more lies. |