'you are the one who wants thousands of children to dies of preventable disease.'

histrionic nonsense and probably libellous.

Terry

As has been pointed out by other posters it is you not I who want to see people die of preventable illnesses.
Swearing and calling people "vile" won't hide the fact that you are evil & want children and pensioners to die.

Don't ne nasty Terry. Follow the advice regarding social distancing & you may help to save lives. Don't be selfish Terry.

Fire.
Some shiny hat loon wittered on about speaking to lawyers and sueing me as I mentioned he was totally obsessed with a Swedish schoolgirl.
The letter from his lawyers never arrived for some reason.


Terry often posts about how he wants children to avoid vaccines, it has been pointed out that his actions would kill many thousands of children but that is his aim. It is hardly libellous as there is plenty of evidence to back up dave's claim that Terry wants to see children die.

Terry

I have some information for you as you seem to be totally clueless about my role in UK government.

I don't know "whats [sic] planned for us" . I am not a member of UK government, I don't get invited to a Cobra meetings, I am not informed before general public of any new plans.

My guess is that we will have another couple of months of this "lockdown " then a phased ending starting in June (hopefully).

Why do you believe I'm so important Terry'?

Fire
will you also report Terry's posts where he swears or maybe where he calls me "vile", for suggesting we follow the government advice.
I think the rules are quite simple.


As mentioned Terry is fairly clear that parents should not gave vaccines to children. Vaccines save lives.
Can you understand the logic Dave used in his post?

So fire and ice has been a forum member for just over a month, is posting at a rate of ten a day and has appointed himself forum policeman.

Suspicious?

I wonder what his previous username was and why he was banned.

Calling someone vile is not libellous.

Mexico, your posts are full of 'I think' and therefore must be valid
They aren't

I've noticed you and your ilk are like moths to a flame when  Terry is about.
Why do you care about what he says so much? Is he that dangerous to postulate a different view to the perceived narrative which many blindly follow?

I don't see you pursuing other dissenters with such venom and relentlessness?

I pursue all the anti-vaxxers with the same venom

More than 140,000 die from measles as cases surge worldwide
Infants and young children most at risk of fatal complications, health agencies warn

https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/05-12-2019-more-than-140-000-die-from-measles-as-cases-surge-worldwide
.

Yes Fire it is dangerous to have a different view regarding this virus.

The "perceived narrative "  is that this virus will kill people, it is real & people should "socially distance "
Terry's view is that this virus is fake & made up , thousands of doctors & scientists are telling lies.

Fire are you intelligent enough to understand why people may consider that view is dangerous.? 

Do you believe it is dangerous for old people to continue as normal & mix with friends & family.?

UK"s Imperial College found as SOLE AGENT of panic over c/v.Who the hell are these people who are destroying human society?

It's not as dangerous as is perceived.
That's what I think based on data gathered.
The data is flawed imo and so I am not as fervent and arrogant to think I am absolutely correct and anyone who disagrees is an idiot.

Note that

SPAIN 1000 DEATHS TO 6,500 deaths 9 days

Italy 1000 deaths to 6,500 deaths 12 days

uk 1000 deaths to 6,500 ?

some modelling says we might not reach it

Not to worry, Cov 19 will eventually run its course and we can return to the days when those with flu like symptom/illness that may not be  life threatening for themselves will again be able to infect those more vulnerable without much comment,  the person coughing their heart up in Wetherspoons  or with an obvious fever sneezing on the bus, sitting behind you in the cinema.
Today they are portrayed as wicked, causing  'unnecessary deaths' a few months ago no one batted an eyelid, no one counted the dead.

Still some cretins on here who don't get that the issue is the hospitals being overwhelmed, not the potency of the virus. The virus may well be less potent than flu but flu doesn't overwhelm the health system. That is the issue and that is the difference. The death rate will jump when, not if, that happens because it is guaranteed to happen.

So, yes, plenty of coronavirus deaths are avoidable whereas the vast majority of flu deaths are unavoidable. If flu overwhelmed the health system every year, the death rate from flu would jump and restrictive measures would have to be taken. Too many morons don't get that this is the issue in all of this, nobody is claiming that it is worse than flu in terms of potency. That is why the death rate is so high in Italy. That is why we are taking temporary measures to restrict the rate of spread. Do you finally get it yet?

if we can get or just about get by with 8000 in next 7 to 10 days we,re hardly going to need 30,000 in 4 weeks time if we,re over peak and seeing benefits of lockdown

ffs its not the death rates its the foooooooooooooooooooking speed of them if hospitals are overwhelmed conditions you wouldn't have died with 6 weeks ago today you might and they might/will have fooook all to do with this virus other than theres no dr or bed to treat you in,
if it makes you sleep easier or helps you put a smug grin on your napper, all the  experts,dr,s wheeled out be government have said 50% or more might have died within 12 months, but its not the fooooooooking point

So it’s about capacity?

They managed it in 68 though.

if 1st one doesnt show, just goggle deaths in uk per month