Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 107 comments are related to the topic:
Parliament to be Suspended
Parliament to be Suspended
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 107
|
By:
Zero evidence at all that the majority of people in the country support no deal.
|
|
By:
Yet another muppet who lives in the dark ages
 |
|
By:
Also there will be people who support no deal who still don't support proroguing parliament.
|
|
By:
Depends on which poll you wish to believe and how much you get brainwashed by Project Fear. I repeat, the only figures that count are the ones from 2016 where the MAJORITY voted to LEAVE.
Simples |
|
By:
Tellys on bud, let it control you
|
|
By:
54% voted for parties that rejected no deal in 2017. Not one poll anywhere shows a majority support for no deal. The best the leave propaganda channels can do is 69% of leave voters in 2016, a small minority in the country.
|
|
By:
The news is on .... moron
|
|
By:
Or jacknary.yet another bbc program
|
|
By:
Remainers are definitely anti democracy. They want our country run by unelected Europeans.
|
|
By:
They are neither running our country or unelected. Dominic Cummings on the other hand currently pulling the strings, who elected him?
|
|
By:
A friend of yours?
|
|
By:
Or a muppet on your tv ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
So an unelected bureaucrat then.
|
|
By:
Yes K SS fair point, rude
|
|
By:
Cummings is a thick tory coont
|
|
By:
No deal wasnt even mentioned pre-referendum - unless it can be established that over 95% of those voting leave wanted to leave without a deal, then No deal is undemocratic. Remainers are up in arms because the Leave campaign were a bunch of lying bsastards
|
|
By:
Was mentioned by the remain side as what leave would turn out to be which turned out to be true. Of course the leave propaganda channels use this material to show that people were talking about it pre-referendum, but of course they miss the point, or actually the don't, they just edit it to fit their agenda, of course that's why you will notice it's always remainers used for this as leavers proclaimed it was project fear.
|
|
By:
Big gamble by Boris - and all big gambles are dangerous.
The majority of the country will be unhappy if no deal is pushed through as well as the majority of our elected politicains. I still think the most likely outcome will be a second referendum (probably after an election) and there will almosyt certaintly then be healthy majority for remain. A moderate tory, labour or coalition government would come in and everyone can get on wth their lives sensibly without everyone becoming 10-20% poorer over the next 10-20 years. |
|
By:
Zero chance of it being a moderate Tory party, the Tory party is now taken over by the far right, the moderates will be forced out or the term I hear they're using is "purged".
|
|
By:
Parliament , and the country will be purged of remainers , Boris must not lack the courage to oppress these ****
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
It is marvellous to see the remainers realising their game is up.
|
|
By:
Never in the World of Seethe ,Will more Seething be Done than over the next few weeks , Remainers in a Desperate state
 Running around Like Headless chickens , Poor old Luvvies its really not fair ...... I dont really care any more what the Outcome is ,I have had enough , But to see these sad individuals is such a state is most Amuzing  and Weeks of it to look forward , Bercrow has nearly Pished his Pants with shock |
|
By:
|
|
By:
looks like you are suspended bap/jucel69
will help you out anutha time hth  |
|
By:
Vote was to leave EU. Every move Boris makes ends up with us leaving the EU. Every step the others take ends up with us staying in the EU.
|
|
By:
We've now got hammond whining on that he will not be able to represent his constituents of Runnymede in parliament, those are the constituents who voted 24000 to 20000 to Leave the eu so hammond hasn't been representing the majority of these for close on 3 1/2 years.
|
|
By:
At least remainers are honest. Yes, like in all democracies, they can campaign to change something they disagree with.
The leave (campaigners) are completely dishonest. To a man they campaigned on the basis that a deal with the EU would be easy. If you explained what a no-deal brexit would entail I would suggest it would get less than 20% in a referendum. |
|
By:
A few previous thoughts by cabinet ministers on the prorogation of parliament.
Nicky morgan culture sec: 'It would lead to a constitutional crisis.' 'Proroguing Parliament is clearly a mad suggestion. You cannot say you are going to take back control … and then go: ‘Oh, by the way, we are just going to shut Parliament down for a couple of months, so we are just going to drift out on a no deal’ Michael Gove Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster: 'I think it will be wrong for many reasons. I think it would not be true to the best traditions of British democracy. Andrea Leadsom business sec, was asked if she could go along with such a plan. 'No I don’t believe I would and I don’t believe it would happen.' 'It's certainly not something I would seek to do. I'm passionate about parliament democracy.' George Freeman transport minister: 'The idea that a new PM will want, let alone be allowed by backbench MPs or Peers, to prorogue Parliament is bonkers. It would look appalling.' Amber Rudd dd work & pensions sec: 'The idea of leaving the EU to take back more control into parliament and to consider the idea of closing parliament to do that is the most extraordinary idea I've ever heard. It is a ridiculous suggestion to consider Proroguing parliament Sajid Javid, chancellor: You don't deliver on democracy by trashing democracy . . . we are not selecting a dictator of our country" MattHancock, health sec: 'There is this idea from some people that to deliver Brexit we should suspend our parliamentary democracy, we should prorogue parliament. That goes against everything those men who waded onto those beaches fought & died for - and I will not have it' MattHancock again: Proroguing Parliament undermines parliamentary democracy. I rule it out and call on all candidates to do the same MattHancock yet again: 'A policy on Brexit to prorogue Parliament would mean the end of the Conservative Party as a serious party of government' |
|
By:
Or maybe sir it’s a distraction from ones own reality, feed the sheep they will follow, within or which ever way...
|
|
By:
BorisJohnson PM: 'I would like to make it absolutely clear that I am not attracted to arcane
procedures such as the prorogation of Parliament. As someone who aspires to be the PM of a democratic nation, I believe in finding consensus in the House of Commons' |
|
By:
normal practice
|
|
By:
I can understand the ideological stance of far right, rich politicians who are so far up themselves they cannot countenance any interference from Brussels even though it is to the massive benefit of the UK in total.
I can also understand the protest vote in 2016 for leaving the EU - the bulk of whom didn't know what they were voting for. What I find hard to fathom is the leavers now who revel in the thought of leaving seemingly because it will make remainers unhappy. Despite every single independant economic model and most leave MP's who say we will suffer economically and it will be the poorest regions who will suffer most they still bury their heads and smile at the thought of remainers misery lol. Meanwhile they never, ever discuss the benefits of leaving. Because, other than giving these rather bizarre people a bit of revenge porn for a few minutes - there simply arnt any. |
|
By:
Why do people want to leave the EU? well they look at Britain 40 years ago, and they look at Britain now
And they prefer how it was 40 years ago, that's all |
|
By:
Good intelligent post Captain - the majority of people I know who voted leave did so because of immigration and freedom of movement, nothing to do with our economic prospects.
|
|
By:
Economically we will be better off if we leave, especially if immigration stops
now of course remainers may be foolish enough to think differently, that's ok, we are not interested in what they think |