Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 299 comments are related to the topic:
Interesting physics. No hiding place
Interesting physics. No hiding place
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 299
|
By:
the "hijackers"
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
They tossed them out of the window for notoriety...
Allah took care of everything..... Well not everyone though...... |
|
By:
All the bodies were CGI, right........
|
|
By:
what bodies?
|
|
By:
She was a girl from Birmingham
She just had an abortion She was case of insanity Her name was Pauline, she lived in a tree |
|
By:
what bodies?
 you mad bastar d |
|
By:
Grant
Wasn't only one passport found in New York , a few blocks away from WTC. As suggested could the terrorist not have simply thrown them out a cockpit window? He may have wanted everyone to know it was him who murdered thousands of people. After all what is the worst that could happen- he knew he would be dead 10 seconds later. Funny how this "interesting Physics " thread does not contain much interesting Physics. It is as if John & the SOG fan club don't understand maths, Physics, logic or common sense. |
|
By:
Indeed one passport found when everything else was turned to ashes,how does that happen?
These guys couldn't even fly a single engine plane yet fly were able to fly proper planes better than veteran pilots, sound like monumental boll0cks to anyone sane? That's because it is monumental b0llocks. Mex full marks defending this sh1t but it don't wash you clown |
|
By:
Terry
You know as much about rating the ability of pilots as you do about Physics. Generally pilots are considered good pilots if the are able to take off & land . These lads did not do either- yet you rate them as better than veteran pilots. I assume Terry you are still totally out of your depth on that Kinetic energy Physics question which a child could answer? As already suggested previously Terry if a document was thrown out a cockpit window before the crash it would not be destroyed in the impact because it would not be in the plane what the plane crashed. |
|
By:
"Hans Christian Mexersen " He may have wanted everyone to know it was him who murdered thousands of people" Do you p1ss yourself laughing at this fantasy you post?
For the third time, explain how WTC7 come down exactly like the twin towers without being touched and how the BBC report it coming down 40 minutes before it actually did."Its not important" wont do or will no reply. |
|
By:
How the fcuk do you throw your passport out iof the cockpit window travelling at the speed they were. As Terrry might say 'Monumetal bow locks'
I doubt you can just wind the window down like a car window. ffs |
|
By:
The way mex puts it puts me in mind of an 'Airplane' movie scenario.
|
|
By:
Drink
Not sure you understand Physics or have ever been in a moving vehicle. The plane is moving at great velocity in relation to the ground but those people inside the plane (I.e doomed passengers & terrorists ) are not moving relative to the plane. If there is a small hole in the cockpit- shall we call it a window then somebody could push a small passport sized object through the window. At the instant that passport is released it will be traveling at the same velocity as the plane but won't have any forward thrust applied & will slow down due to air resistance. Drink, Terry. What part of putting a small object through an open window do you find impossible to comprehend? Drink & Terry you have both forgot to answer that children's Physics question on this Physics thread. Hardly a surprise from Terry as he has managed to avoid answering any question on any thread. https://scandinaviantraveler.com/en/aviation/ask-the-pilot-can-the-windows-really-be-opened |
|
By:
Mad to suggest it was thrown out the window, but far more plausible is it was in the cockpit with the bad guys flying it, the cockpit was far ahead of the rest of the plane so when it all went "bang" it was riding the front of the blast wave with other debris going out the othe side.
|
|
By:
Is "Snakes on a plane" a movie worth watching?
|
|
By:
That's a much better theory i would say
 . Throwing it out the window makes no sense, even if it was possible.@JC The problem with your theory however, as OP clearly mentioned, is that it defies Newton's laws. The plane should have crushed on impact. End of story. As OP said:The wings would break off immediately upon contact and the plane would explode(there goes your passport in flames). It would not enter the tower and then explode. The plane would simply be obliterated to pieces by the steel box columns and steel and concrete floor trusses before it got anywhere near the inside of the tower. Newton’s First Law of Motion: “A body remains at rest or in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.” The plane did not slow down as it made contact with the tower. How can the plane fly at the same speed through the steel/concrete face of the tower as it did through the air? This is impossible. The “plane” also violates Newton’s First Law. |
|
By:
2+2 makes 4 does it not detraveller?....
|
|
By:
Passports are fairly hardy heavy little things, they aren't bits of A4 paper. I'll place bets you could throw one a fair distance.
"@JC The problem with your theory however, as OP clearly mentioned, is that it defies Newton's laws." No it doesn't and I'm not going to entertain the idiotic scientifically clueless copy/paste b/s of the OP, end of story. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The grass is green.
|
|
By:
Sounds great. Thanks, detraveller!
|
|
By:
I've never seen it. Always wondered if "sharknado" is worth a watch for being totally ridiculous.
|
|
By:
Conditor, you are showing a better understanding of Physics & Maths than John/Terry.
You ready to solve some Newtonian differential equations? Funny how none of the uneducated fans of the son of God are able to answer simple Physics questions on a Physics thread . |
|
By:
Who’s this god person,the chap seems to be busy elsewhere.mexico?
|
|
By:
On reflection I have been really silly thinking it is possible to pot a small object out of a window- clearly nobody would do that as littering is very naughty & if caught in Bew York the culprit could get a rather large fine.
So obviously those thousands of witnesses were wrong, the radar data was wrong, the photos were wrong, the videos were wrong, the phone calls were wrong. After all Newton said a 300,000kg object travelling at over 100m/s will just bounce off a glass & steel building & land across the Hudson in New Jersey. |
|
By:
And 2+2 makes 4 ,don’t be a puppet
|
|
By:
And i^2 makes -1, don't be a puppet.
|
|
By:
Don’t or won’t!
|
|
By:
FFS Mexico is imagining numbers now!
 |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Always cricket detraveller?
|
|
By:
Conditor, if you have a point to make, make it clearly. The 2+2 thing that you post when you're exposed is too old. You have an opinion, say it.
|
|
By:
I can understand it maybe hard for you, as you are a believer in OP's physics. But I can't respond if all you're going to say is 2+2 makes 4.
|
|
By:
Very good JC.
Made me laugh anyway. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Wrong thread. This one's just a repetition of first.
|
|
By:
Whoops I just fcked up. It's catching.
|
|
By:
NORAD's Santa Tracker Began With A Typo And A Good Sport
https://www.npr.org/2014/12/19/371647099/norads-santa-tracker-began-with-a-typo-and-a-good-sport |
|
By:
MOON MISSILES?
NORAD conducts regular testing and drills to ensure that all systems and operators are functioning properly. However, mistakes still happen. When the BMEWS was first deployed, NORAD operators underestimated its range. When the moon rose, radar reflected off of it and generated a cluster of false signals that were initially mistaken for enemy bogies. A computer adjustment solved the moon problem. A computer glitch in 1979 began sending intermittent reports of massive numbers of Russian missiles heading toward the United States. The numbers were so outlandish that operators knew it was a glitch, but they weren't so sure a year later, when a test program was run without putting the system into test mode. Luckily, the error was discovered before any harm was done [source: Tom Stockman]. https://science.howstuffworks.com/norad3.htm |