Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 299 comments are related to the topic:
Interesting physics. No hiding place

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 6 of 8  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 299
By:
detraveller
When: 17 Aug 19 20:56
So what's the end result then?
By:
detraveller
When: 17 Aug 19 20:57
Eng lose or draw?
By:
peckerdunne
When: 17 Aug 19 20:59
Death by velocity................Laugh

A bit like Smithy.............Grin
By:
peckerdunne
When: 17 Aug 19 21:03
ive been quiting sweets and chocs etc as i workout quite a bit, however i succumbed to a bag of dolly mixture and now i feel sick........
By:
peckerdunne
When: 17 Aug 19 21:03
quitting
By:
Mexico
When: 17 Aug 19 21:20
JC

The leaning tower experiment was supposedly conducted by Galileo (of Bohemian rhapsody fame. Little evidence he actually conducted the experiment there but experiment has been repeated at different locations countless times.

Pect
I am older than 14 years old - I have filled in a Betfair "know your customer " form & they believe I am older than 18 years old just because I provided them with evidence.
Peck - I don't like to repeat myself- unfortunately the uneducated tin foil hat loons refuse to answer simple questions. I noticed that you didn't bother to answer that simple Kinetic energy question.
By:
peckerdunne
When: 17 Aug 19 21:26
No i didn't answer.
By:
Mexico
When: 17 Aug 19 21:45
I am aware you didn't bother to answer a simple Physics question on a thread about Physics.

Thank you for posting that reply. Is your hat shiny enough?
By:
peckerdunne
When: 17 Aug 19 21:51
Repeating again.

You could seek help.
By:
Just Checking
When: 17 Aug 19 21:51
It's that time of year and I was watching the seeds getting blown off some thistles (or dandelions etc do same), and the wind was catching them and they were going waaaay into the distance. Interesting to think that a thistle plant growing on the moon, the seeds would just drop straight down same speed as a cannon ball.

That's probably why they don't grow there.
By:
GRANTCKING
When: 17 Aug 19 21:59

Aug 17, 2019 -- 8:57PM, detraveller wrote:


Eng lose or draw?


draw

By:
Get me a drink
When: 17 Aug 19 23:36
The girder the plane hit was anchored to the rest of the building so that makes the physics questions null and void doesn't it?

Or at least changes it to a different aspect.

Talking of interesting physics, I find it interesting that all 3 buildings didn't topple. They fell into their own footprint. One of the buildings never got hit by a plane but still fell which is weird.

Some conspiracy theories are probably true, what are the odds of every single conspiracy theory being false? Very very high I would say.

What are the odds of a tall buiding falling into it's own footprint? Very high I would say, so for 3 its very high * very high * very high, so probably billions if not trillions to one against. This versus the odds of it being controlled demolitions. You choose.
By:
jucel69
When: 17 Aug 19 23:46

Aug 17, 2019 -- 12:06AM, Mexico wrote:


June Stop crying and answer the question on a Physics thread which any 14 year old of average intelligence could answer.Btw I can answer your off topic question.The "air defences " we're not "down" as your bias question claimed.Actually the "air defences " we're not designed to shoot down passenger jets. There had been high jacking before 2001 & the "norm" was to fly to an airport rather than crashing into a building.So any chance you could attempt to answer a simple Physics question on a Physics thread?Come on Juice- a child could do it.


So protocol was to just let it crash into the pentagon

Jesus wept

By:
jucel69
When: 17 Aug 19 23:52

Aug 17, 2019 -- 6:33PM, Charlie wrote:


JuceI've tried watching the video you gave a link to and found it the most boring thing I've ever watched. I defy anyone to follow what she's on about. If you call that evidence a plane never crashed into the Pentagon then you must have followed all the 'quotes' she gives. I have actually looked at a good few things she said and can't agree with her. She's giving her opinion which should be taken at face value and not as fact.


Charlie, can you answer why it was allowed to crash into the most heavily guarded facility in the world without any resistance?

Especially after two planes had just rammed into the twin towers!!


I think the video is easy to follow.

How did the plane not hit any obstacles on the way to hitting the pentagon? There are lights on the descent path which would have taken the wings off.

By:
jucel69
When: 17 Aug 19 23:56
Amazing how easily people are brainwashed into believing the official stories from govts
People moan daily about how vile & corrupt our politicians are yet lap up these stories like plebs
By:
jucel69
When: 18 Aug 19 00:00
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld,  old man pedo Bush
A few of the most heinous people ever to come out of the good old US
They couldn't give two fcuks about killing people for power
Look into their involvement in aspartame, that will tell you all you need to know about those cùnts
By:
Mcginty
When: 18 Aug 19 12:49
No planes crashed into the Twin Towers or the Pentagon

Watched films of the so-called second plane over and over again.

Sorry to tell you but it's CGI and not very good CGI.

That's the only way you get a plane to crash through a building like it's slicing through butter.

Only need a few people to say they saw planes and everyone agrees.

All eye witness accounts are from actors and the deluded.

Ask yourselves this question....

WHY IS THERE NO CCTV FOOTAGE OF A PLANE CRASHING INTO THE PENTAGON...PROBABLY THE MOST SECURITY CONSCIOUS BUILDING ON PLANET EARTH?!

You can't pinch a packet of sweets from the corner shop without being caught on camera.
By:
edy
When: 18 Aug 19 13:03
oh boy oh boy
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 13:07
Every conspiracy nutter starts with Why...

Great that you can ask a question that many don't have an answer to. But that doesnt prove anything.

Its just a good question thats all.
By:
peckerdunne
When: 18 Aug 19 13:52
Only need a few people to say they saw planes and everyone agrees.

All eye witness accounts are from actors and the deluded.

wtf
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Aug 19 14:00
Why do these tin foil hat loons post so many lies


The Pentagon is not the "most heavily guarded building in the world "

FFS - it is an office building- they had tours open to the public
You did not even have to pre-book. Turn up, show your passport, have you bag X-rayed & walk through a metal detector.


And of course the son of God fans - won't bother to answer the most basic of Physics questions on a thread about "Interesting Physics " & Newton's laws of motion.
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:10

Aug 18, 2019 -- 12:49PM, Mcginty wrote:


No planes crashed into the Twin Towers or the PentagonWatched films of the so-called second plane over and over again.Sorry to tell you but it's CGI and not very good CGI.That's the only way you get a plane to crash through a building like it's slicing through butter.Only need a few people to say they saw planes and everyone agrees.All eye witness accounts are from actors and the deluded.Ask yourselves this question....WHY IS THERE NO CCTV FOOTAGE OF A PLANE CRASHING INTO THE PENTAGON...PROBABLY THE MOST SECURITY CONSCIOUS BUILDING ON PLANET EARTH?!You can't pinch a packet of sweets from the corner shop without being caught on camera.


If it was CGI where did the planes go?
Surely the take off and landing times are logged somewhere?

By:
peckerdunne
When: 18 Aug 19 14:11
Laugh
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:12
This jucel guy must guy as he has researched so much on it.
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:12
*must know
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Aug 19 14:16
Juce
Charlie, can you answer why it was allowed to crash into the most heavily guarded facility in the world without any resistance?
You make it sound as if planes crashing into the the Twin Towers Pentagon is an everyday experience. I'm prepared to accept that NORAD fcked up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._military_response_during_the_September_11_attacks
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5654/debunking-911-myths-planes/


How it managed to evade all the lights/structures without crashing or at least taking off the wings and blowing into pieces. Most of the fuel is stored in the wings.
Wings aren't as delicate as you may think: https://www.quora.com/Where-is-fuel-in-a-passenger-aircraft-stored-and-what-is-the-typical-capacity.
It's also well documented that the plane did hit lights before crashing:
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/10/07/bringing-closure-to-the-911-pentagon-debate/
Why do you think that the wings should have been taken off?

You could go on and on including the size of the hole in the pentagon and the debris.
What size hole do think it should have made and what debris is missing?
https://www.thejournal.ie/fbi-pentagon-911-3318220-Mar2017/
https://vault.fbi.gov/9-11-attacks-investigation-and-related-materials/9-11-images
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a5659/debunking-911-myths-pentagon/
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/videos/category/history/this-priest-witnessed-the-911-pentagon-plan/


Amazing how easily people are brainwashed into believing the official stories from govts
Even more amazing that people actually believe loon tube conspiritard videos without checking the facts.
By:
John.W.Henry.
When: 18 Aug 19 14:20
Hopefully this thread has exposed the deniers. They simply need new laws of physics applied to suit their beliefs Shocked

Never forget this thread, hopefully the day will come when it all gets exposed for what it is ... [b]A FAIRY TALE WRITTEN, PRODUCED AND FILMED IN HOLLYWOOD.
, and the real criminals are brought to face justice.

With their defence i hold them complicit to the deceit and there4 i cannot no longer engage with them . To me they are as guilty as those that fabricated this official narrative and it makes me feel sick tbh.

Never forget those that defended the indefensible .. It will help you when looking at a thread where they have participated.

They are the Liars, the goons who never bother to research for themselves and believe anything the main stream media throw at them.

The kind of lunatics that marvel at David Blaine moving through infinity and beyond, maybe he is really Buzz Lightyear ?

My next list will expose them for what they really are so any1 who has missed this will be able to cross reference their stupidity back to here.

Good .. Its progress.. ( as i anticipated it would be )  The fraudulent liars who would deny tomorrow is the next day and yesterday was the day b4 this one.... they are all on here.

The picture publishers ( time would be better spent researching properly ), the fabricators and the braindead. They have all raised their head above the parapet and as sure as eggs are eggs I will expose them for their nonsense.

Stand by,, It is on the way, Grin[/b].
By:
peckerdunne
When: 18 Aug 19 14:21
You often see the stumps light up but the bails don't come off...
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:23
John is back. The usual waffle.
By:
peckerdunne
When: 18 Aug 19 14:24
And here comes JWH with his Doosra.............
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Aug 19 14:24
Yet more waffle from the Waffler.

Unfortunately no answer to the physics question.
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:26
Maybe hes thinking and will answer it shortly.
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Aug 19 14:27
Once again John has gone into hiding after posting complete nonsense.


The plane did not slow down as it made contact with the tower. How can the plane fly at the same speed through the steel/concrete face of the tower as it did through the air? This is impossible. The “plane” also violates Newton’s First Law.


WTF
The Poland did slow down - it came to a complete stop in less than 100m . How is than not rapid deceleration?

The plane also had big jet engine at the moment of impact. 


And besides-  thousands of people saw the 2nd plane strike & loads of photos, videos live TV , radar tracking etc.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Aug 19 14:27
He doesn't do thinking dt.
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Aug 19 14:29
Mexico
I was going to point that out but wanted him to answer the first question first. His whole post is nonsense.
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:35
John's done a runner again.
By:
Mexico
When: 18 Aug 19 14:38
Agree Charlie

I can't understand why people who were a total failure at school & can't grasp the most basic concepts of Physics or Maths would post something claiming to be "Interesting Physics " "quoting " Newton.
By:
detraveller
When: 18 Aug 19 14:44
what a clown John W Henry. Creates a thread and then goes into hiding.
By:
GRANTCKING
When: 18 Aug 19 14:57
anyone else think its amazing they found the passports down on the street within about 15mins when everything else was obliterated Laugh
By:
Charlie
When: 18 Aug 19 15:41
Whose passports?
Page 6 of 8  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com