Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 316 comments are related to the topic:
This LGBTQ/Muslim school malarky.
This LGBTQ/Muslim school malarky.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 316
|
By:
|
|
By:
aaronh Stop deflecting my opinions on this subject could fill a page and they contain no bias.
I'm against anyone who is on the LGBT bandwagon (those faking for attention and special treatment) and don't believe that Muslims with their fictional self serving lives should be dictating the rights and wrongs of unavoidable biological issues some have to deal with. |
|
By:
I'll take that as a yes, you do approve of WK's posts then
|
|
By:
you seem to be reading all my posts and then writing stuff like the second part of your post and thinking it is relevant to what I am saying
|
|
By:
aaronh I haven't read your posts on this subject just got the cut of your jib from casemoney's post and it was spot on.
|
|
By:
casemoney just too cowardly to outwardly say the things that others are saying on here, so just going on the defensive with his question
|
|
By:
don't need to bore yourself with my posts, just ctrl+f woundedknee's
|
|
By:
Pmsfl , I asked you a question on a Forum you have failed to answer it ,I have absolutely no Interest in the Muslim community
and have very little contact with it, How could I ask them ? Answer the Question Why do you think there is Such an uproar within the Muslim community regarding Teachings on Gay Sex which is deemed a Sin by Readers of the Book , Yet the same communities have stood by while mass rape took place across the UK ?? Is having sex with Minors not deemed a sin ? It all seems very strange to me, If you are not interested in answering the Question or have no opinion on it Say so . It will save me having to read any more of what you post , something else of which I have no interest in . TBH I could not give a Flying if you answer or not ,the rest of the Forum will judge you not me  |
|
By:
Still using the strawman then. Have you ever heard that 2 wrongs don't make a right?
|
|
By:
As a matter of interest casemoney while you were on your ban did you go around to many indigenous communities and apologise to them for the Catholic Priests who buggered and beat their children?
Answer the Question Why do you think there is Such an uproar within the Christian community regarding Teachings on Gay Sex which is deemed a Sin by Readers of the Book , Yet the same communities have stood by while mass rape took place across the UK ?? Is having sex with Minors not deemed a sin ? It all seems very strange to me, If you are not interested in answering the Question or have no opinion on it Say so . |
|
By:
Injera • May 22, 2019 5:46 PM BST
You're not seriously suggesting teaching on mixed race relationships is akin to Adam and Steve and Mary and Martha?? Well, what exactly is wrong with Adam and Steven and Mary and Martha being consenting adults that wish to live in a loving partnership with each other, or also them just humping like two wild buffaloes to have fun? Open question to anyone, not just you. ...not a single answer to this since I asked yesterday evening despite so many new posts? Very disappointing |
|
By:
Totally agree with you Whispering regarding abuse by all religions and have raised the Christian Catholic Issue on several threads which you have obviously not read , IMO they are all scum exploiting people suffering from delusions I hope that covers the Subject ...
My thoughts on this current subject is that it may well lead to an escalation of Homophobia among A certain group , where that could end up ,who knows ,its bad enough as it is .. Where have I said I was banned ??? You seem to know alot about my comings and Goings yet don't read anything I write  I agree with Edy its peoples Choice Live and Let Live but I do think sex education for 5 year olds is going to far , Straight or gay . |
|
By:
Whispering Must have a Paper Round
|
|
By:
But casemoney, it's not at all about teaching the graphic details of sexual intercourse to 5 year olds, straight or gay. That ain't what Department of Education wants. It's only the homophobes who try to portray it as such because they don't have any real arguments without that kinda lie.
|
|
By:
Why call people homophobes edy?
Surely you're capable of rising above using abusive language. |
|
By:
Homophobe is now defined as 'An individual who enters a debate about same sex relationships without an LGBT agenda' .
|
|
By:
Dr Crippen, surely you can differentiate between normal definitions and abuse. Homophobe is the former, as e.g indicated by a lack of words like "informal" or "offensive" in its entry in the highly regarded Oxford dictionary.
Always glad to help and educate you, my good friend  |
|
By:
Either way, Dr Crippen, the question
Well, what exactly is wrong with Adam and Steven and Mary and Martha being consenting adults that wish to live in a loving partnership with each other, or also them just humping like two wild buffaloes to have fun? is open to you too. |
|
By:
Only in case you do think there is something wrong with it, which I strongly doubt someone all around admirable like you does.
|
|
By:
nacho novo! fecking ****!
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I know, but it seemed to have gotten lost to some in the heated discussion and needed a repetition.
|
|
By:
Mr Whisper anyone who lives in MEDWAY is either mental or stupid and obviously POTLESS .. what a proper p1sshole of a place .. you must fit in with all the inbreds
 |
|
By:
Homophobe is now defined as 'An individual who enters a debate about same sex relationships without an LGBT agenda' .
Apparently that is the case with some Reynard. edy clearly uses the word as a slur. I stand by my original comment. So come on edy, surely you're better than that. |
|
By:
What's a homonymph?
|
|
By:
Dr Crippen, please stop purposefully mispresenting things against your own better knowledge for the lone purpose of smearing others.
Surely you are better than that. |
|
By:
Ease up edy. you're having a go at me now your old mate.
It sounds like you've been eating red meat. |
|
By:
I do actually not eat animals other than fish, nor dairy, nor eggs. Thank you for your concerns about my dietary habits though. I wasn't having a go at you though. I was instead cheering for you, my dear friend, to believe in being and portraying the best version of yourself.
|
|
By:
How very kind of you edy.
|
|
By:
Reynard - that's an excellent description of where we are, sadly.
edy - to have a go at your question..I don't believe in this 'ground zero' morality situation. I believe some things, traditions, cultures etc are worth keeping and celebrating. It seems so much of what we once were is being stripped away. The single parent thing is ruinous to society yet championed by the progressives. A man and woman in marriage is proven to be highly successful in bringing on the next generation. It has its flaws, of course, but it remains a great blueprint for society. That's what we've taught our kids and I hope they pass it on to theirs. |
|
By:
Ps I certainly will NEVER take my moral stance from the Department of Education or any other Govt dept, think tank or quango.
 |
|
By:
Thank you Injera, but that doesn't really answer the question. Why should children not be taught that it's ok if two men or two women who love each other very much choose to spend their time together?
It won't be the end of the occident and the end of heterosexuality and happy families. It will simply open the doorway for more children of God to not be spit at for absolutely no good reason other than choosing the consenting love life that God created them for. |
|
By:
They've been showing them Bert & Ernie for years.
|
|
By:
Injera • May 23, 2019 3:09 PM BST
Ps I certainly will NEVER take my moral stance from the Department of Education or any other Govt dept, think tank or quango. Please don't be such a fifth columnist that doesn't accept the rule of law, someone who puts himself and his religiously founded believes above the state. |
|
By:
Eric & Ernie in bed together was also considered family viewing.
|
|
By:
Because, in my humble, I reckon the tradition of marriage between man and a woman is worth celebrating and encouraging at the expense of all other types of relationship. That's not to deny other situations don't exist but it's say 'marriage between a man and a woman is best'.
Anyone who as you say spits at gays or worse is pathetic and needs a slap. As for this 'love each other' thing. That's not a reason to enourage any type of relationship. Incest is illegal as is polygamy and under age relationships. Any 'love' in those situations is superceded by law or can I say common sense. |
|
By:
It won't be the end of the occident and the end of heterosexuality and happy families.
Indeed, if anything, it will lead to more people feeling free to come out instead of feeling pressured into a heterosexual relationship which they end up leaving early because they're miserable. |
|
By:
What if man and woman are on the verge of killing each other to death?
|
|
By:
Oh please, don't bring out incest, polygamy and under age relationships. You know full well that at least incest and under age relationships are in an entirely different league.
|
|
By:
edy are you German?
|