Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 252 comments are related to the topic:
Gazza's at it again
Gazza's at it again
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 252
|
By:
There's always more going on for some reason I didn't know that about his mate.
|
|
By:
You begin to lose my attention with you persist in blurring what I've said or what I think when you come up with this crap What do you get out of trying to defend the honour of these types
Can you now go and find any one of posts where I have 'defended their honour'. Secondly, you just said such an important issue which although has been touched on in the mainstream gets nowhere near enough coverage. yest earlier on at 00:24 you said The reason that Asian paedo threads are on here are because they AREN'T in the media and get no coverage due to the type of dishonest thinking the likes of you So in the space of 27 minutes, the amount of coverage of the Asian p@edo rings has gone from, and I quote "No coverage" to "nowhere near enough coverage"  This is typical of you today, constantly twisting things, putting words into my mouth, making stuff up and now shifting the goalposts as demonstrated above. What happened during those 27 minutes, is that I pointed out that the BBC have covered these stories in all of these affected towns, and there are plenty of links to prove it. You're really not worth my time. |
|
By:
Think you're the one that needs a good rest smirnoff.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
so now we've moved on to what the coverage was in your area
Your area doesn't receive BBC, a place where internet access goes down when asian p@edo rings stories goes up? I can't believe I'm even trying to reason with you and the smirnoff who really should take himself back off to the Horse Racing forum, he fits in well there. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Scanda you were off...........ages ago ......need i say anymore
 all i need at this time of night/morning is Saints game to go unders  wheres the ghosthunter briggsy when ya need him |
|
By:
scandi you are making an rse of yourself trying to explain this subject away to a straight person with 0 political interest/agenda and who doesn't tell lies especially as you are trying to make things up and mock the issue.
"Your area doesn't receive BBC, a place where internet access goes down when asian p@edo rings stories goes up?" |
|
By:
fred needs a song .......
common apparently..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeldvNxpW44 ooooossssss |
|
By:
denzil it pretty ovious the haven is very unintelligent person and who just does not get.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
oh my days best series ever - come back and slate me if remotely wrong
|
|
By:
Seem to watching less and less telly probably change when the bad weather comes.
|
|
By:
Calling it a night smirnoff bait time.
|
|
By:
divnt be tekking nee cheese toasties from briggsy but deffo get that watched - im just getting warmed up as the voddy goes down
|
|
By:
superjudge 23 Nov 18 00:38
what about him haven dr hook hand. he not only had free speech he had a police protection around him while spouting on about terror. If the governments of the day said it was legal the virtue signallers would defend the filth. None of my Guardianista friends were concerned with what he preached, they didn't take him seriously. |
|
By:
As posted on this thread, you were already caught out lying/bending the truth as pointed out in my last post at 00:58, no coverage to not enough coverage to not in my area
have a day off and take smirnoff with you. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
scandi the only reason you are involved in these subjects is because you are completely dishonest and can't treat all the same way which you already know,nice to see I've triggered you good and proper which I knew anyway from your ridiculous reaction over Mel B.
|
|
By:
Go and read the post at 00:58, that proves conclusively what a liar you are, you're not in a position to call anyone else the same thing.
Secondly, you said that "What do you get out of trying to defend the honour of these types " I asked you to show me where I defended these types? but you failed to do so and what's more, earlier on in this thread I said that this was the worst crime and should mean life, that's a funny way of defending their honour. Btw I've lost count of the number of insults you've thrown at me yet I haven't, as posted the other day, when you start insulting people it really means you've lost the argument. I'll leave you to it. |
|
By:
Nov 6, 2018 -- 11:04PM, scandanavian_haven wrote:
5 girls and it's the black one that is singled out as a slag and common as muck, why bother hiding your prejudices, just come out with and say what you are you'd get more respect rather than using other flimsy reasons. Me She isn't a slag because she's black hth. |
|
By:
No coverage
wait wait not enough coverage hold on a minute! not in my area |
|
By:
Just got what you mean as you keep posting the wrong time.
Of course the no coverage was an obvious referral to pre trial there is no coverage in the media unlike the pre trial coverage of the likes of Saville etc. The Asian paedo coverage we get is when these trials are over which you know already. |
|
By:
Unless the government have declassified the media exposure rules for the protection of muslims etc. which is supposedly not in the public interest I'll be happy to stand corrected,as for the case which I've seen extensive coverage on which was of interest to me in my area (obviously) the only name and character assassination was of the white woman with learning difficulties.
Once again if you find any evidence of the 19 Asian men being treat the same way I'll stand corrected though once again that's extremely unlikely also. |
|
By:
Denzil I set you some homework, you said that I defend the honour of these types, for the 3rd time, please go and show me a post I’ve made where I have done such a thing, if you fail to do so it will just add to list of white lies you’ve told.
I can’t take someone like you remotely seriously when you shift the goalposts so quickly when either caught out or trying to move the subject on to deflect away from the nonsense you’ve posted. The example above perfectly illustrates this at 00:58, you just make things up to suit your argument and now that I’ve highlighted it you’re more and more frustrated and resort to more insults. I’ve leave you to play in your own sand pit. |
|
By:
From scandi today
Btw I've lost count of the number of insults you've thrown at me yet I haven't, as posted the other day, when you start insulting people it really means you've lost the argument. My first interaction ever with scandi which HE initiates due to his acceptable racism sensitivity issues Nov 6, 2018 -- 11:04PM, scandanavian_haven wrote: 5 girls and it's the black one that is singled out as a slag and common as muck, why bother hiding your prejudices, just come out with and say what you are you'd get more respect rather than using other flimsy reasons. So this insinuation would definitely count as an insult to some but I aint that bothered by your type especially on an anonymous forum anyone who can read can see what's happened here. This really shows exactly what you are if you think you've been insulted by me at any point up to now you really are the forum f@nny. |
|
By:
scandi people can read,people can read dates,people can see your unprovoked accusations due to your 'issues' might be time for the hot water bottle and bar of chocolate for you.
|
|
By:
scandi going out for a bit so think of something to say for later that doesn't resemble a periodic tantrum.
|
|
By:
Misogyny might be a good subject to revisit
 |
|
By:
Scandi and Porky win double in there Flat in Brompton Road
|
|
By:
Poor Denzil, now for the 4th time, go and find me a post where I have, in your words, defended the honour of those types of people
You wont be able to do it because as proven with the post at 00:58 last night, you’re a proven liar, you make up the press don’t cover these stories whatsoever, then when proven otherwise, you change your story to ‘not enough coverage’ and then ‘not in my area’ it’s too laughable for words. Then to wriggle out it, and to deflect attention away from answering the question about ‘defending their honour’, you start waffling on about spice girls. And to top it all off, you do it throwing insults left, right and centre, when none has been thrown at you, that also shows the lack of class and that you’re floundering. So imagine my amusement when it’s you making accusation of tantrum thrown. You're not fooling anyone else other that your other alias. You haven’t given me any reason to engage any further with a rude, aggressive, compulsive liar - as said earlier, best you have a day off. |
|
By:
And to top it all off, you do it throwing insults left, right and centre, when none has been thrown at you, that also shows the lack of class and that you’re floundering. So imagine my amusement when it’s you making accusation of tantrum thrown. You're not fooling anyone else other that your other alias.
scandi the first contact you and I had was an insult from as posted above November 6th on the Spice Girls thread,your sensitivity is there for all to see you have made an rse of yourself obviously not for the first time by this pathetic squirming. In my short time on here I've been accused of being many different users thanks for likening me to an intelligent,well balanced and honest one on this occasion as some of the others weren't in that bracket. You will engage with me further as I've triggered you and you are niggled by me and my kind. Do you still think Bernard Manning is a racist after his 'Asian' neighbour of 20 years said he wasn't,that was quickly ignored by yourself. By attempting to knock people who criticise paedos on anonymous forum because they are a race or religion you can't speak negatively of THAT IS DEFENDING THEIR HONOUR in my book. If your daughter for example was a victim would you still act the same? and you say I've got no class. |
|
By:
So that's a no then
you cannot provide the evidence, unsurprising as I've already shown you to be a liar.As for triggered DenzilPenberthy 23 Nov 18 12:23 This really shows exactly what you are if you think you've been insulted by me at any point up to now you really are the forum f@nny. DenzilPenberthy 23 Nov 18 11:54 walos you are obviously a clown of the highest order Think you're snookered! |
|
By:
In my opinion not criticising paedos and knocking those who do is defending their honour you aren't exactly against it are you which is something else everyone can see.
That doesn't make me a liar it makes you someone who is ok with pedophilia if the right people are the perpetrators. Calling you a f@nny is nothing as an insult but I can see why someone as sensitive as yourself would consider that more serious. |
|
By:
What's occurring to me now is I'm actually spending alot time in a back and forth with the forum 'Paedo Defender' who as long as a person isn't white can pretty much do anything without criticism,bet you're glad this is an anonymous forum.
|
|
By:
*who thinks*
|
|
By:
What time does Hollyoaks start?
|
|
By:
Wow, you've just actually called me a 'p@edo defender'?
You cannot get any lower than that. You must also have missed my post yesterday when I said that is the worst crime and it should be life Here it is denzil, just for you, scandanavian_haven 22 Nov 18 22:51 It would be a full time job popping on to these P@edo related threads with the word Asians in it to condemn them, stories sought out by the same posters time and again and used as a weapon to beat the whole religion of Islam, however A few weeks ago I said this is the worst crime there is and it should mean life with the key thrown away. There's no redemption from this crime. Some defender I am - I think you are having a nervous breakdown. So you call me a f@nny and a clown and then say I’m triggered when I’ve not made similar insults? And you fail to prove that I have defended the honour of those types after the 4th time of asking, or is it 5th, I’m losing count. And as per the 00:58 post last night, you are proven to be a liar who shifts the goalposts when he’s been caught out. You’ve run out of real estate on this one, nowhere else to go. |
|
By:
Sorry 'Asian Paedo defender' didn't make myself clear thought you'd get the gist.
If you aren't the above why are you against the same people posting on the threads? |
|
By:
Why don't you like anyone criticising 'Asian' paedophile gangs? Have you shifted your stance on this issue and will you now condemn them which is something else you blatantly ignored yesterday?
And is Bernard Manning still a racist despite being shown otherwise? |