Another US shooting

No security at this synagogue according to reports.  Not sure how many do.

Does not Sound good at all

Totally sick I believe Pennsylvania has the death penalty - not going to bring back the innocent victims though.

did he sanction it then?

There will never be gun control in America no matter who is President.

11 dead :( What a sad world :(

Any Mention of Scientists ,Engineers   or Young footballer Types ?

Casemoney and Just Checking. The following is taken from the BBC News just now. Hope this is helpful

What do we know about the gunman?
US media said he had shouted "All Jews must die" as he carried out the attack.
Social media posts by someone with the name Robert Bowers were also reported to be full of anti-Semitic comments.
Image of Suspected attacker Robert Bowers
Pittsburgh FBI's special agent in charge of the investigation, Bob Jones, told a press conference that he did not know if Mr Bowers was known to authorities prior to events on Saturday. He said that any motive remains unknown but that authorities believe he was acting alone. Mr Jones added that the investigation was "in the early stages". "We will look at every aspect of the suspect's life," he said. Mr Bowers is receiving treatment for what has been described as multiple gunshot wounds.

What has been President Trump's reaction?
He called the shooting a "terrible, terrible thing". "To see this happen again and again, for so many years, it's just a shame," he told reporters on Saturday. He described the gunman as a "maniac" and suggested the US should "stiffen up our laws of the death penalty". "These people should pay the ultimate price. This has to stop," he said. Mr Trump added that the incident had "little to do" with US gun laws. "If they had protection inside, maybe it could have been a different situation," he said. The president later appeared at the Future Farmers of America Convention in Indianapolis, saying: "There must be no tolerance for anti-Semitism. It must be condemned and confronted everywhere and anywhere it appears. Speaking to reporters after the event, Mr Trump said the attacker was not one of his supporters, describing him as "sick".

The BBC (this is their latest narrative btw) put right smack in the bulletin on this that the US is now swathed in political violence (that they attribute to trump) and linked it to this.

Fair enough :)

I actually think the BBC are deliberately far more prone to bias on the TV for two reasons-
* You have to be a geek to record it and then throw the bias at them
* You can't copy/paste spoken word to show what they just did.

Re the earlier week one it was to do with Dyson openin a car plant in Singapore.
The BBC w*nker on the 1pm news somehow turned this (despite the fact it was nothing to do with Brexit) to a "Brexit is sh1t" narrative.

"you think that the BBC has a different editorial policy for TV News vs Web News, you are either wrong, or are attributing far more sophistication to their editorial bias than is actually the case, or you are just plain wrong."

So despite the evidence dished out every day, the fact that TV and web journalists are different people, that they obviously know full well how they will be observed, I'm wrong because you don't like it. Well done...

A Looney Luvvie ?

Well he’s talking tripe actually

11 dead and counting

Funny how a broadcaster supposedly bound by law to be impartial, isn't remotely impartial and laughs at the idea, and we are forced to pay for it or go to prison. How amusing this is.

I'm sure Guardian readers would love it if they had to pay 150 quid a year to fund the Daily Mail or face a jail sentence.

"In fact, it's only ever those who have fallen prey to certain online commentators who ever think it's impartial"

What a monumentally and obviously stupid thing to say. But par for the course from the author.

Channel 4 , BBC  , the guardian the list is endless according to the Spiv fans

Tbf, radio 4 seems to exist only to educate us all day everyday about our many minorities and how they suffer/have suffered. It's like Blue Peter for those who regard themselves as educated. Radio 5 does the same job on the less educated. Absolute rubbish to most of us.

I grew up in a house where the Mail and Sunday Express was delivered. When I left I bought the Guardian for around fifteen years. When it comes to unbridled/unashamed propaganda, the Guardian wins hands down.

And yes I would agree that the mail, sun and telegraph have a slanted agenda dictated by their owners, I don't have to buy them, or the Guardian. Who decides the BBC bias? I don't know, but I do have to pay for it.