Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 123 comments are related to the topic:
Analysis of standard, typical politico thread on here:
Analysis of standard, typical politico thread on here:
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 123
|
By:
|
|
By:
It is almost always young men , and older , they did the same thing under communism and fascism
Nothing much changes , it is very difficult to create a peaceful and free society That is what we have been lucky to have in Britain , but it is not the norm , look around |
|
By:
I know men suck, lfc. That isn't news. I'm convinced that men are able to reform though and we, as men, are slowly progressing.
|
|
By:
No we are not slowly progressing , not at all
|
|
By:
Oh we are. Men as a whole are smarter and better behaved then ever before. No matter what the geezers claim.
|
|
By:
Really , name me someone smart in Britain
|
|
By:
Caucher Birkar
|
|
By:
I’ve never heard of him , what has he done again ?
|
|
By:
Won the fields medal this year.
|
|
By:
I know there are intelligent people edy , but are they as intelligent , or more do as you claim than in our past
Well the evidence is not there that they are They may be , any examples |
|
By:
Medals are fine , what has he achieved
Now say what you will Britain has a glorious past of intelligent people Hundreds, thousands of them |
|
By:
And we now live in the country that they created
Not us , they created it Be thankful |
|
By:
The average man is much more educated and with it much, much, much, much more civilised than in days gone by, there just isn't any denying.
|
|
By:
ok
|
|
By:
Just think back to all the brutal rascals that kept beating you lean, tiny nerd up.
|
|
By:
Didn't happen to me and I was the most whimsical, leanest nerd one could ever imagine.
|
|
By:
and you guys always used to punch each other just for the sake of it
|
|
By:
People obviously possess more knowledge in today’s modern world, but it could be argued that we are not more intelligent than our predecessors. Who today is more intelligent than Isaac Newton or Albert Einstein for example? Certainly some very intelligent people who are standing on the shoulders of past giants, but none of them with superior intelligence IMO.
|
|
By:
I wouldn't necessarily disagree that we currently don't have such peak geniuses. At least they certainly don't stand out as much. The broad over male population however, is no doubt better educated and civilised.
|
|
By:
*broad overall
|
|
By:
lfc1971 & Torquemada, hay foot, straw foot.
|
|
By:
Yes all these gifted people in Britain are really there , but they are just hiding
I suppose anythings possible |
|
By:
We don’t know who they are , no one across the world can name them
|
|
By:
You gotta admit that Crispr is pretty darn cool.
|
|
By:
Something seems to be missing from edys chain that we are more intelligent than in the past
Evidence , where are the books, where is the music , where are the new inventions , where are the new ideas that make us see the world in a different way Such as Newton and Shakespeare and Einstein and the Wright brothers and Darwin and Bruce Springsteen I don’t know |
|
By:
Those are people who we can name , because of things they have done
The evidence is there, in black and white |
|
By:
Russian hooligans are making fun of European hooligans for having become soft. That is all the proof anyone should ever need that we are moving our societies towards being more educated and well behaved.
I'm sorry to hear you don't like modern literature, music and the many recent-ish inventions you are using extensively every day though. |
|
By:
There have been no new inventions for 30 or 40 years
Bill gates and Steve Wozniak are old men now |
|
By:
I like modern music , but you see the electric guitar was invented in the 1930s / 40s
|
|
By:
That’s a pretty cool thing right there , agreed?
|
|
By:
Electric guitars are just tools to foster sin and decadence. The real cool stuff like the CRISPR/Cas genome editing method is recent and where it's at.
|
|
By:
Anything like that recently that started a musical revolution that touched everyone , or the computer revolution started by 3 or 4 young men in California 40 years ago ?
|
|
By:
I don’t know , something seems like it is missing
Where are all these talented and intelligent people that edy claims exist Who are they , show me the evidence Good |
|
By:
Anyone see Boris's comments today?! He's referred to Muslims in full veeils as looking like letter boxes!
 Must have a forum name shirley. I certainly don't agree with the so called lefties on here but I'd take a bullet for their right to hold their opinions. |
|
By:
There is no automatic right to hold opinions , it depends on what those opinions are
|
|
By:
It’s a question of judgement line everything else
In Britain we have been lucky to find ourselves in a country that has come to as good and fair and democratic a society as has ever existed But that is thanks to people before us |
|
By:
Studyform
You start by labelling TR as nationalistic shoite, likening him to hitler and concluding that “anybody who doesn’t love him must be a supporter of pakistani rapists” all of which doesn’t follow and is patently bollocks ... You then go on to liken the EDL (single-issue movement opposed to Islamism) to other more distinctly racist organisations (the quintessential MSM tactic) more bollocks ... I then explain my position (essentially the same as TR) defending the sovereignty of the individual etc to which you reply that “One of the most outright dishonest things about supporters of far-right propaganda and ideology, is the outright denial that it is right-wing and that is because you think it will gain sympathetic views if you claim to be "Socialist". implying my position is as you suggest … biggest pile of bollocks... In answer to your questions what is it I want? I’ve already made that very clear (see above) but to elaborate .. i’d like to live in a society where the establishment, police, judiciary and media etc aren’t complicit in this cowardly condascending and racist patronage of those who in the view of the original post “are above or beneath” criticism. Muslims are the primary victims of all this stuff and nonsense and i’m certainly not going to condemn somebody over an accident of birth. You should be free to believe whatever BS you like but don’t impose it on anyone else and don’t expect me to bend over backwards to accommodate you with a different set of standards. You dismissed my comment about Post structuralism but it is absolutely fundamental to understanding this issue. Over the previous few decades its rancid propogation within the education system and consequently the establishment has led to the deep seated belief that the validity of a view or position is entirely dependent upon the proponents position in a condascending hierarchy of intersectionality. More simply, if you possess “white privilege” then you should feel nothing but guilt and your opinion is worthless. Hence the muddle we now find ourselves in. I have a question for you, what did you make of the Lauren Southern Luton incident? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxjH5hZYTbQ Not around much today so doubt i'll be able to reply |
|
By:
Studyform
You start by labelling TR as nationalistic shoite, likening him to hitler and concluding that “anybody who doesn’t love him must be a supporter of pakistani rapists” all of which doesn’t follow and is patently bollocks ... You then go on to liken the EDL (single-issue movement opposed to Islamism) to other more distinctly racist organisations (the quintessential MSM tactic) more bollocks ... I then explain my position (essentially the same as TR) defending the sovereignty of the individual etc to which you reply that “One of the most outright dishonest things about supporters of far-right propaganda and ideology, is the outright denial that it is right-wing and that is because you think it will gain sympathetic views if you claim to be "Socialist". implying my position is as you suggest … biggest pile of bollocks... In answer to your questions what is it I want? I’ve already made that very clear (see above) but to elaborate .. i’d like to live in a society where the establishment, police, judiciary and media etc aren’t complicit in this cowardly condascending and racist patronage of those who in the view of the original post “are above or beneath” criticism. Muslims are the primary victims of all this stuff and nonsense and i’m certainly not going to condemn somebody over an accident of birth. You should be free to believe whatever BS you like but don’t impose it on anyone else and don’t expect me to bend over backwards to accommodate you with a different set of standards. You dismissed my comment about Post structuralism but it is absolutely fundamental to understanding this issue. Over the previous few decades its rancid propogation within the education system and consequently the establishment has led to the deep seated belief that the validity of a view or position is entirely dependent upon the proponents position in a condascending hierarchy of intersectionality. More simply, if you possess “white privilege” then you should feel nothing but guilt and your opinion is worthless. Hence the muddle we now find ourselves in. I have a question for you, what did you make of the Lauren Southern Luton incident? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxjH5hZYTbQ Not around much today so doubt i'll be able to reply |
|
By:
Studyform
You start by labelling TR as nationalistic shoite, likening him to hitler and concluding that “anybody who doesn’t love him must be a supporter of pakistani rapists” all of which doesn’t follow and is patently bollocks ... You then go on to liken the EDL (single-issue movement opposed to Islamism) to other more distinctly racist organisations (the quintessential MSM tactic) more bollocks ... I then explain my position (essentially the same as TR) defending the sovereignty of the individual etc to which you reply that “One of the most outright dishonest things about supporters of far-right propaganda and ideology, is the outright denial that it is right-wing and that is because you think it will gain sympathetic views if you claim to be "Socialist". implying my position is as you suggest … biggest pile of bollocks... In answer to your questions what is it I want? I’ve already made that very clear (see above) but to elaborate .. i’d like to live in a society where the establishment, police, judiciary and media etc aren’t complicit in this cowardly condascending and racist patronage of those who in the view of the original post “are above or beneath” criticism. Muslims are the primary victims of all this stuff and nonsense and i’m certainly not going to condemn somebody over an accident of birth. You should be free to believe whatever BS you like but don’t impose it on anyone else and don’t expect me to bend over backwards to accommodate you with a different set of standards. You dismissed my comment about Post structuralism but it is absolutely fundamental to understanding this issue. Over the previous few decades its rancid propogation within the education system and consequently the establishment has led to the deep seated belief that the validity of a view or position is entirely dependent upon the proponents position in a condascending hierarchy of intersectionality. More simply, if you possess “white privilege” then you should feel nothing but guilt and your opinion is worthless. Hence the muddle we now find ourselves in. I have a question for you, what did you make of the Lauren Southern Luton incident? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxjH5hZYTbQ Not around much today so doubt i'll be able to reply |
|
By:
No we are not slowly progressing , not at all
Correct, it's technology that improves and advances not human behaviour. We kill with bullets and bombs now instead of swords and arrows, and we do it on an industrial scale. Witness the devastation caused by the civilised West recently in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria. The on going conflict in Palestine. The sight of Iraq and North Korea developing their nuclear weapons. Africa with all their wars, which are hardly reported by the way. Squaring up to Russia at every opportunity. The main reason Europe has maintained peace since WW2 is because we carved up Germany, and stationed troops there. Now after reunification, the German Empire in the form of the EU is looking to have it's own army again. And we're supposed to be getting better? What he's applauding is that we're letting ourselves in Europe get overrun by ethnic groups, that's what many on the left view as progress. |