Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 123 comments are related to the topic:
Analysis of standard, typical politico thread on here:
Analysis of standard, typical politico thread on here:
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 123
|
By:
Bollocxk
|
|
By:
You said 2 of those listed on the left were not rude
Did those 2 include me ? |
|
By:
You two can go and do things on your own now, my point is made, and proved.
I'm analysing it no further. If you don't agree then tough. lfc, you make no sense and are now becoming mildly irritating and I have work to do. |
|
By:
Now you’re being rude again
|
|
By:
Oh last thing, I'll wager you're kicking yourself you missed this thread yesterday akabula.
|
|
By:
[i]You two can go and do things on your own now, my point is made, and proved.[/i]
Really laughing out loud at that. SF at the wind-up and fishing.  |
|
By:
My point is made reminds of Trigger and his defence of Daphne in Crossroads.
|
|
By:
Have just had a quick look at that thread and at no point did I say anything rude to anyone as far as I can see , who would have believed it from study’s ‘analysis’
Studyform you in the other hand were very rude |
|
By:
I was on yesterday SF and chose to ignore it.
You on the other hand bite like the fish in the Minch on a Saturday morning. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Yes and as I said you stated that only 2 people on the right were not rude
Did that include me or not ? |
|
By:
Name them and shame them study , I think we can all agree that you were rude
|
|
By:
Just fecking read the opening post on this thread, you idiot.
(there, that's rude - but justified) |
|
By:
disgraceful language from yourself study , you should be ashamed
Well you wee worse yesterday in that thread , that’s plain for anyone to see |
|
By:
Every time SF is rude he says it's justified.
BTW is that your 3rd or 4th post since you said you'd be commenting no more? Try not to be rude when replying please, I'm easily offended. |
|
By:
politeness is a delight for civilised people aka
|
|
By:
STUDYFORM –
So, opposing an ideology (Islam) that is by any reasonable standard truly (ultra) right wing somehow, wait for it… situates you as being right wing? Of all the dumb, bizarre non sequiturs you’ve posted, and believe me there have been quite a few, that is just about the dumbest. This an issue (protecting the sovereignty of the individual) that transcends such a simplistic notion and is testimony to your general cluelessness and MSM inflected way of engaging with the world. One can only presume all that Post-Structuralist flim flam you’ve been spoon fed at Unee has finally blown your entire mechanism. And for that reason i’m out. I wish you well with the Alan Partridge-esq chit chat pie chart. Good luck. |
|
By:
Right I'm off out so I'll get your reply, rude or otherwise, later.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
So, I never said you were rude then lfc?
did I? But you won, you kept chipping away until I have to remind you how stupid you are. Just deflect, ignore and then not answer. Oh and you could try looking at your initial posts on here when - unprompted - you called me; dishonest, warped and criticised everything I'd written lux. You posted a complete load of garbled BS about Tommy Robinson/muslims, and only returned once to post more - your only task was to spread the word. Now you say it's all about opposing an ideology. Yeah, right. I think it's probably fair to describe this ideology as a religion, but that doesn't get the same impact or make you able to play down the agenda so well, does it?. Post-Structuralist? WTF is Post-Structuralist? Did you learn that in GCSE sociology? I didn't go to "unee", I have no idea what MSM is, no matter how many times I see it mentioned on here. One of the most outright dishonest things about supporters of far-right propaganda and ideology, is the outright denial that it is "right-wing" and that is because you think it will gain sympathetic views if you claim to be "Socialist". Twas ever thus. BNP, Britain First, National front, and now EDL. All tiny insignificant gatherings often formed from football terraces and often containing violent offenders. They all claim to be NOT right wing, they all claim to be peaceable (it's the opposition who are violent), they all have very little by way of manifesto. And now, they all use social media and forums to spread the gospel. |
|
By:
To add one more thing to my previous post.
Ironically enough, the very same people that regularly use those debate killer phrases on their "opponents" like "rape gang supporter" or other similar stuff in a blatantly obvious attempt to make them shut up and control the speech patterns and debate, then five minutes later claim their "opponents" are opposed to free speech. |
|
By:
now let’s take another little look at Study’s analysis of the lefts comments
Next one down from A-T ( who was immediately rude ) is dave 1537 His first comment was does no one ask why white working class parents fail their children Now everyone knows that in the modern work it is very difficult for any parent to look after and protect their children It depends on the good values of others in the rest of the world But daves post seems to want to demonise the victims and has undertones of racism and a sneering condescension towards these people and their families And study’s assessment of daves post ? .. A fair question Well that may be so in the case of study’s mind , and daves and others who posted on that thread That tells you a lot right there |
|
By:
Dave and his like have no empathy and you can see that time again in his posts,a dodgepot,avoid!
|
|
By:
STUDYFORM falls into his own trap by doing himself exactly what he is criticising. Which is discussing personalities instead of policies.
A prize plum if there ever was one. As for my ''direct insult.'' he mentioned. That was in reply to insults from STUDYFORM where he referred to people as Nazis. I merely pointed out an obvious Nazi trait in STUDYFORM's political makeup. |
|
By:
edy 06 Aug 18 10:25
Aug 6, 2018 -- 10:07AM, lux wrote: It's not just simple opposition to Islam. I've voiced repeatedly and openly, more openly than many others actually, that we need to get rid of the oppression that Christianity and Islam put on our societies, and thankfully humanity is slowly but surely moving away from all that vile fantasy stuff. ................. The world would probably be better with no religions. As for society moving away from them, the one that causes death and destruction round the world on a daily basis is the one that is increasing it's number year on year. Sitting back and hoping that they will eventually change their behaviour while other religions fade away, is to gamble with our whole society, there is every chance we will lose. |
|
By:
No Crippen. You're lying, or deluded, more likely both
You had written nothing on the thread. I mention Nazis, You insult me. Directly. You never miss a chance to have a pop do you? Makes you every bit the person (?) I say you are. Or do you always do your insulting on behalf of others? Like the minimum 90% wrong fool that you are. lfc. You are a (insert any load of swearing you can think of here). |
|
By:
You had written nothing on the thread.
Never said I had. This is what I wrote: That was in reply to insults from STUDYFORM where he referred to people as Nazis. So you see STUDYFORM, you are wrong again. Tell me STUDYFORM - why are you always wrong? |
|
By:
Studyform having “no idea” what MSM means doesn’t bode well for his chances of “knowing more about nearly everything” competition against Jed.
Made me laugh that. |
|
By:
Edy
But humanity, at least in the west is not “slowly but surely moving away from all that vile and fantasy stuff” on the contrary, an increasing Islamic population necessitates its sinking deeper into that particular mire and that is the problem. I think it’s unfair to draw some kind of equivalency between Christianity and Islam. The worst excesses of Christianity have long since been disavowed by the majority of Christians wordlwide, the same cannot be said for Islam whose texts remain the perfect immutable word of God and whose followers continue to act out its worst excesses every single day. Islam is a religion, yes, but there are religions and religions... and Islam can be most accurately described as a totalitarian ideology that seeks to control every aspect of your life. One that is completely inimical to western values. A cursory glance at any major poll of the attitudes of British Muslims taken over the past 10 years demonstrates this quite clearly. Studyform In a liberal western democracy we should be free to criticise Islam without fear of being labelled all kinds of language devaluing nonsense like Islamophobe, fascist, nazi etc. As i’ve said before it is an idea and like any idea should be fair game for an open and honest discussion. Denying such a fundamental democratic principle, seeking to somehow Police and control language, is to be an advocate of true fascism and tyrrany. If in your distorted, bonkers, view of the world that somehow makes me a proponent of far right ideology then i’ll quite happily wear that badge with pride. |
|
By:
Also, he claimed to have never heard of Tommy Robinson...
|
|
By:
Also interesting to note Studyform’s appraisal of his buddy Dave1357’s first post on the other thread. You know, the one where Dave responded to a post about muslim men grooming and sexually abusing children by questioning the parenting skills of white parents! Clearly a deeply offensive and repugnant comment to most decent minded people, not to mention the rank hypocrisy of someone who seldom tires of accusing others of “”whataboutery.”
Studyform’s take on that disgusting post? “A fair question.” And that, ladies and gentlemen of the Chit Chat forum, should tell you all you need to know about Studyform, Dave1357, and the rest of the lefty liberal crew on here. |
|
By:
But humanity, at least in the west is not “slowly but surely moving away from all that vile and fantasy stuff” on the contrary, an increasing Islamic population necessitates its sinking deeper into that particular mire and that is the problem.
An increasing number doesn't really mean the world isn't moving away from religion overall. There is an undeniable overall trend towards westernisation in the muslim world. I think it’s unfair to draw some kind of equivalency between Christianity and Islam. No, it isn't unfair at all and Christianity is also most accurately described as a totalitarian ideology that seeks to control every aspect of life. The difference is simply that we have freed ourselves from their shackles to a bigger degree and with it forced the religion and their leaders to be just a little bit more acceptable and less oppressive if they want to stay in our lives in any capacity. |
|
By:
I think you will find that it is Christians who have allowed you the freedoms we enjoy in Britain and in other countries
Other religions and other societies are not so tolerant We don’t have to look far to se the dangers from people and from countries with an atheist ideology |
|
By:
Now if and when those countries are as tolerant and free as Britain then fine
Come back and let us know |
|
By:
The division between church and state within christianity "render unto Caeser ...etc" which ushered in a reformation holds no parallel within Islam. Islam is fundamentally incapable of reform, it is the immutable word of God.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Lux, what is it you want?
Stop interacting with all muslims? Convert them all? Send the all to somewhere else? What is it you're trying to achieve? |
|
By:
lux, there are so many different denominations in islam one can't even count, all of them being the result of reforms and influences. The young, increasingly westernised populations in the muslim countries will increasingly take over as the old yesteryears keep dying off.
|
|
By:
Well it’s like this, they are in Britain
But the question remains why ? |
|
By:
It is the young who are committing the atrocities
|