Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Just to "put to bed" a few misconceptions about the users of this joke of a forum.
A thread - I hate the liberal left (A view on Tommy Robinson) - is started.
It's a badly written error strewn, supposition based diatribe, designed to garner support.
The usual (let's call them) right-wingers, mostly use their posts to insult the "left" who apparently proliferate, yet...
There are at least 3 times more right-wingers than left-wingers, not that you'd believe this from the comments.
I have also detailed each person's 1st post on the topic and it's noticeable that the "right" who always claim they're being insulted in the main begin with, or do nothing other than, insults.
Not one "leftie" began with an insult
Once again, everyone will see what they want to and will mostly be wrong, but it'll change nothing.
considered to be of the "right":
flushgordon1 - insult
saddo - Fair point
posy - possibly not something he'd say in public
Insider Trader - driving home the message
jed.davison - direct queston, followed up by many insults, which wasn't called for.
scaredmoney - A point in support of subject
injera - defence of subject
bigmo - ironic question in support of topic, followed by insults.
twizzle22 - direct insults of all "lefties" on thread, followed by having a go at people in nearly every post.
Ibrahima Sonko - taking a comment completely and deliberately out of context
casemoney - question, based around an insult
lux - Reinforcing opening post with equally flawed, badly written, skewed follow-up
blackrock - insult
GoOnThen - direct insult
timbuctooth - standard stuff against "lefties"
Dr Crippen - direct insult
Torquemada - Big attack on "the left" coupled with insult
Tallywagger - Anti "left" post
lfc1971 - A non-sequitor
GRANTCKING - anti "left", out of context referral
considered to be Left
A_T - reacting to insult.
STUDYFORM - vaguely impolite response to opening post
dave1537 - fair question
PorcupineorPineapple - disparaging remark about subject
DIE LINKE - general observation about forum
unitedbiscuits - note of caution, observation about poster
aaronh - one post responding to a ridiculous post.
These 3 are not included.
TheBaron and terry McCann, non-committal posts
moisok, loads of posts about the same subject as always, but claiming to be a rampant "leftie"
A thread - I hate the liberal left (A view on Tommy Robinson) - is started.
It's a badly written error strewn, supposition based diatribe, designed to garner support.
The usual (let's call them) right-wingers, mostly use their posts to insult the "left" who apparently proliferate, yet...
There are at least 3 times more right-wingers than left-wingers, not that you'd believe this from the comments.
I have also detailed each person's 1st post on the topic and it's noticeable that the "right" who always claim they're being insulted in the main begin with, or do nothing other than, insults.
Not one "leftie" began with an insult
Once again, everyone will see what they want to and will mostly be wrong, but it'll change nothing.
considered to be of the "right":
flushgordon1 - insult
saddo - Fair point
posy - possibly not something he'd say in public
Insider Trader - driving home the message
jed.davison - direct queston, followed up by many insults, which wasn't called for.
scaredmoney - A point in support of subject
injera - defence of subject
bigmo - ironic question in support of topic, followed by insults.
twizzle22 - direct insults of all "lefties" on thread, followed by having a go at people in nearly every post.
Ibrahima Sonko - taking a comment completely and deliberately out of context
casemoney - question, based around an insult
lux - Reinforcing opening post with equally flawed, badly written, skewed follow-up
blackrock - insult
GoOnThen - direct insult
timbuctooth - standard stuff against "lefties"
Dr Crippen - direct insult
Torquemada - Big attack on "the left" coupled with insult
Tallywagger - Anti "left" post
lfc1971 - A non-sequitor
GRANTCKING - anti "left", out of context referral
considered to be Left
A_T - reacting to insult.
STUDYFORM - vaguely impolite response to opening post
dave1537 - fair question
PorcupineorPineapple - disparaging remark about subject
DIE LINKE - general observation about forum
unitedbiscuits - note of caution, observation about poster
aaronh - one post responding to a ridiculous post.
These 3 are not included.
TheBaron and terry McCann, non-committal posts
moisok, loads of posts about the same subject as always, but claiming to be a rampant "leftie"
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 123
|
By:
Why am I listed as far Right ? I asked if Dave was a Hipster ? What has that to do with the Far Right ...
|
|
By:
Someone asks a question and is Branded an extremist ...
|
|
By:
Very careless of them not to capitalise LEFT like they do in the Daily Mail.
|
|
By:
They'd get their point across much better if they did.
|
|
By:
Yep, case, welcome to the wacky world of leftieism!
Aah, diddums, the world`s not treating study as well as he feels entitled to! Poor boy! How long did that list take to compile? And nobody`s empathising!!! You lot have had your day, it didn`t work; be gone, along with your evil creed, Lucifer`s calling, |
|
By:
^ FAIL
|
|
By:
(major)
|
|
By:
Did I say FAR right?
|
|
By:
I don't expect empathy, I expect you to do exactly what you're doing.
And another (new) one, crawls out of the woodwork. |
|
By:
Is nobody considered centre any more?
|
|
By:
So, with typical misrepresentation, casemoney.
I haven't put the word "FAR" anywhere and your question was, albeit with a smiley face, having a pop at dave1357, it really wasn't a genuine question, was it? The point remains though. The majority of active users on here have frightened, or bored, most of the original users of the forum off. and (the list above plus a few others) won't be happy until there's only them left. What I don't understand is why you can't take the politics back to the Politics forum. The only answer seems to be that, still following old BNP guidelines, many of you are still using the internet to spread the word. I'd like to see the old forum back and you've stopped that being possible. |
|
By:
Unfortunately, Hank, You're either with the whole message or you're a leftie.
|
|
By:
I'd like my own country back and some have made that impossible.
Sorry STUDYFORM  |
|
By:
You're absolutely right study that chit chat was much better before all the politics threads started showing up.
|
|
By:
Are they the same freds that Studyform posts on all the time ?
|
|
By:
Warming up now.
|
|
By:
As a neutral IS I'd say study is responding to them and did not start the move away from the topics we used to have. I know you post on other subjects, but there are some on here that only ever post politics on chit chat and absolutely nothing else.
|
|
By:
There used to be so many other topics on which to post.
Loads of quizzes, recipies, general chat, information, problem solving. Now all more or less gone. I still run occasional competitions, started threads such as the pictures of people who look alike and the comedians thread. Have YOU ever started any threads, or posted much on non-political ones, Ibrahima Sonko? Saddo, whatever you're after, the posters on here didn't make it happen and won't be doing anything to change it... lobby your MP if you want to make a difference. |
|
By:
Personally i dont see every fred where their is a difference of opinion to be all down to politics, more to do with a discussion about society in general.
People have different opinions but some go into meltdown mode when they think they are always correct and anyone who thinks differently is far right. |
|
By:
fav biscuit ?
|
|
By:
But, as shown typically by the opening post, tat isn't what happens.
It's just what you THINK happens. |
|
By:
These aren't threads about society in general. They're the same old crap regurgitated by the same people time after time and ANY semblance of disagreement make whoever (and they're ALWAYS in the minority), a leftie of some sort. How can those who disagree with something be labelled "far right" when it's them who start most of the threads?
They'd have to be disagreed with, not doing the disagreeing, surely. Just like this thread. casemoney said I listed him as FAR right. No such thing happened. |
|
By:
Most freds by the so called 'far right' are mainly news stories, things that have actually occurred then discussed on a forum, the arguments after are usually between people of different opinions.
Why would you care if a leftie was in a minority in an discussion, unless..... |
|
By:
unless it was intended as a sort of insult, eh?
On this forum everyone not in agreement with all aspects of topics ranging from the ubiquitous Tommy Robinson to Donald Trump, via a bit of slating Corbyn, is a "leftie" or "Libtard" Look at who starts threads, at who starts the insulting and what for the disagreements take. Not what you perceive them to be. Just have a look. It's all there to be seen. I just detailed ONE thread. It isn't all of them, nor is it ALWAYS the case. Just mostly. |
|
By:
Oh and in case someone picks me up on it, I realise I spelt non sequitur incorrectly.
|
|
By:
Here we see an example of the warped nature of Studyforms way of looking at things
Anyone who looks can see that right from the very first post by A -T, and continued by himself and all the other leftists the nature of their replies and comments were abusive on a personal level to other posters That was the nature of their posts , almost all of them |
|
By:
Studyform not only is your ‘analysis’ warped it is also dishonest
You said you would look at the first comments of every person ( of course that is a nonsense ) But when you looked at Jed. davisons first comment you found it to be a perfectly reasonable and polite question so you decided not to say that was the case didn’t you ? And of course Yuu didn’t mention your rude reply to that reasonable and polite question either |
|
By:
Interesting op...have to say hadn't got you down as a leftie Studyform as our views seem to coincide on the need for the Government and Judiciary to grow some balls in their response to criminality.
|
|
By:
It doesn’t matter if Studyform is left or right , the thread wasn’t about him
|
|
By:
lfc.
you are mad, deluded and very, very stupid and as always almost entirely wrong. As ever you have chosen not to read it properly. A_T was reacting to rudeness (as I am now) The opening post of the thread was divisive badly written garbage, so I really think that those disagreeing with it were quite restrained. I posted what actually happened, therefore any deviation is in your head. Jed's 1st question was in fact mentioned as being direct, my reply wasn't insulting, just diect and I then qualified it. Not that this is the subject of the thread. You can interpret the rest in whatever strange little way falls out of your computer. As for being dishonest; f*ck off. And, as for all the "lefties" they're outnumbered about 3 or 4 to 1. You have chosen to ignore the tenet of my post because it doesn't suit you. Posy, I'm not of any direction, I just like to see fairness and I'm sure our views coincide on lots of things. It's just that the forum direction, and agenda, has now given every contributor a label, but compared to many of the users I'm Karl Marx. |
|
By:
Sorry study A-T was rude on a personal level to op , that was the very first response
You didn’t say that jeds first post was reasonable and polite did you , you’re being dishonest again You said it was followed by insults Now that is just one example , I could go through almost everything you have said and find it to be similarly dishonest That’s too bad , but is illustrative of the problems pointed out by the poster on the original thread |
|
By:
SF in no way was that thread A standard, typical political thread on here.
I thought it a thread to provoke indignation from the left and it certainly did that. Please note I have neither backed or condemned the comments before you attack me. As regards this thread then all I'd say is ffs reel yer neck in. |
|
By:
I've just read you're comments on those considered as lefties.
Feckin embarrassing tbh. Or are you doing what you say you despise and fishing? |
|
By:
I wouldn't suggest you had, akabula. you missed this one yesterday.
Great thread though... 20 something people got a reaction from 5 people. 2 of those only (listed as left) only posted once and weren't rude. All I've written stands. I'm not "attacking anyone". You can interpret it how you like... Oh, you are! |
|
By:
If you read the actual thread and see the opening posts of all the people on it you'll see what I've said is accurate.
OR, you could just decide you don't like how it looks and tell me I'm inventing it. |
|
By:
Ah what was rude about my first post study ? ( I may have been rude later I don’t think so can’t temember )
|
|
By:
What's happening here, is that you are reading stuff on here in the same way you always do, and what/who you basically agree with gets ignored.
I didn't say you were rude lfc, I said you posted a non sequitur. |
|
By:
Point proved, I think.
|
|
By:
What you said is innacurate as per your norm.
You find a reason to justify anything from those posters you agree with the opposite for those you disagree with. Hypocrisy in it's finest form. |