|
By:
complete nonsense, no one is ever refused NHS treatment, even if they should come from every corner of the world, and then fly home again
|
|
By:
students should not be included , they are a completely different thing from immigration
|
|
By:
non eu migration in itself ,which we can control, runs into 100s of thousands
when the eu folk go home we will need a system in place to replace them in a controlled manner .....no plan that i can see ? |
|
By:
there are reducing non EU migration or at least were when May was home sec
not sure of figures now |
|
By:
of course windrush generation were being refused nhs treatment
thats one of the biggest scandals of the whole shambles |
|
By:
no they weren't
|
|
By:
Prove to us that someone has ever been refused nhs treatment ?
I find it hard to believe. |
|
By:
I will explain again, the NHS refuses no one in this country who is British, or indeed any other nationality treatment
billions of pounds are lost and never paid in this way |
|
By:
Students should be counted in and out.
Currently they are not. Many stay on illegally. Many pair off with natives. There is nothing wrong with this provided they do it properly. It is not easy as there are many forms to fill in and the spouse has to prove they can support the person from overseas. The big issue is those who overstay their visas and then moan they have a partner and kids here so we must allow them to stay even though they have not applied. That is disrespectful of those who do it properly. |
|
By:
when students do that they are not students, they are illegal immigrants
don't confuse one with the other |
|
By:
lfc1971
28 Apr 18 10:01 Joined: 06 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 21,843 | Blogger: lfc1971's blog I will explain again, the NHS refuses no one in this country who is British, or indeed any other nationality treatment billions of pounds are lost and never paid in this way ^ Not true. If you turn up and A&E and need treatment or emergency operation etc they would do it. But you could not just get a GP appointment and get into the system. |
|
By:
albert thompson was told he would have to pay £54 k for cancer treatment he required
|
|
By:
you would not need one if you turn up at a hospital, and everyone in Britain has a GP, if they wish
|
|
By:
no GP is going to refuse to see you if you are ill, even if you are in prison
don't worry about that |
|
By:
quite shameful
he only now has a date to start treatment after government was shamed its simply shameful , and odd that ill informed people are prepared to make fools of themselves |
|
By:
It comes after he was told last year he would have to pay £54,000 unless he could produce the right documentation.
So he was never refused ? |
|
By:
he was waiting for a date to start treatment, he would always have got that treatment assuming he was legal
|
|
By:
planet sonko
![]() |
|
By:
Mr Thompson is not technically of the Windrush generation as he arrived in the UK from Jamaica in 1973 as a teenager.
|
|
By:
no he wouldnt lfc
it has taken intervention in parliament and his treatment highlighted exactly what was going on a shameful treatment, and frankly a shameful attitude on here too |
|
By:
he was always going to get the treatment , in theory he might have been legally obliged to pay
#guess what he would never have had tp pay no one does, thousands of cases every year were people who don't have the right to NHS` treatment don't pay |
|
By:
he wasn't told he wouldn't be treated Donny
|
|
By:
according to snowflake libtard generation if i wanted to fly abroad and didnt not have correct documents then i could label the authorities as racist, cruel and mean.
|
|
By:
if he was in Britain then he would have been treated
that is how it works, nothing stops that |
|
By:
He wasnt ever denied treatment either. But according to donny this guy is now brown bread.
|
|
By:
no one and no power would have stopped albert Thompson from getting cancer treatment
|
|
By:
sonko has lost the plot again
your stalking is sad |
|
By:
In theory he might have had to pay , even at some time? no that does not happen either
|
|
By:
they did stop him getting treatment by slapping a £54,000 charge if he wanted to go ahead
and parliamentary pressure has ensured he will recieve treatment some sad folk about |
|
By:
So it turns out this chap wasnt even part of the windrush generation, he simply didnt have any documents. But alas the left and donny try and use this as an argument, totally disingenuous but that is what the left do.
|
|
By:
he was on the waiting list for treatment, his doctor was aware of his condition and he would have been treated as soon as possible
not a single day would have been lost because of his status not a single day, or a single hour |
|
By:
![]() |
|
By:
if he was on medication this would have continued, would not have stopped regardless of his status
|
|
By:
So I will ask again, do you have any examples of the windrush generation being refused treatment by the NHS ?
|
|
By:
unless you are telling us donny that this mans GP refused him medication and refused to put him forward for cancer treatment on the NHS
I don't believe that |
|
By:
carry on trolling sonko
|
|
By:
The Home Office has been playing catch up for years in all aspects of immigration including pretendy asylum seekers who seek to do us harm.
The Parson Green tube bomber a case in point. Multi cultural policy alligned with political correctness has led to Telford, Rotherham, knife crime,gangs,ghettos Rochdale, Oxford, home grown terrorists etc etc. The Home Office has been front and centre of this debacle for a generation. Rudd's the latest in a long line of Home Secretaries who's not up to the job. Windrush will be her undoing but it could and should have been any of the above. |
|
By:
well did he get the treatment lfc
no was he told he would have to fund the treatment yes has that been changed after parliamentary intervention yes |
|
By:
trolling, stalking, this is so predictable when you cant answer a simple question.
|
|
By:
I,m afraid we can hardly blame Rudd for all that
might as well get rid of everyone in parliament |