|
By:
That’s fine terry , if May is wrong then a british court can decide
|
|
By:
The Russians will say lets see the evidence,we will say no,the Russians say you cant have them without
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
That ok terry obviously if these men are guilty the Russians are going to say that
|
|
By:
Now if Russia has any evidence that these men are innocent , or the 2 men in the litveneko case are innocent that’s fine
A British court can decide , what’s wrong with that ? |
|
By:
It send some poor deluded souls on here seem to think that the photo evidence has been faked
I’m sure a good defence lawyer will be able to point that out |
|
By:
* it seems some poor deluded souls ( you may be one of the terry, I don’t know )
|
|
By:
Ive not seen it IFC
|
|
By:
There you go , I never really thought you were deluded either terry
That’s good |
|
By:
the first image is from CCTV1 and the second is from CCTV2. Whatever that means, it says that on the met site.
They've just numbered all the CCTV screengrabs they've uploaded of them in sequential order on their site. These are CCTV images 1 and 2... pic of them at Salisbury station the next day is headed up CCTV 8, then at Heathrow CCTV 9 etc. My guess is that the timestamp thing is just the result of the Gatwick cameras not being set correctly/not working. The Met describe the Gatwick pics as being taken at 15:00 hours. Why then put a timestap on saying 16:22 (and do the same for both pics, just to make it look even stranger)? Why put a timestamp on at all? If they're manufacturing/Photoshopping these pics, why not just leave the timestamp out completely? Heathrow/Salisbury pics don't have any timestamp, and we're not questioning that. |
|
By:
You see the Russians are a very stupid and incompetent people , in the main
And Putin is fairly typical , that is why he has ordered the Russian agencies to say the photos have beeen faked by the British That alone shows you just how silly Putin is, he can’t help it |
|
By:
So they found traces of poison in their hotel room,we are told even the smallest drop would kill and yet all the people who went into that room to stay or clean nothing wrong with them, does that makes sense?
|
|
By:
How much was there , how long had it been there , where was it found I don’t really know
But of course Putin himself said that if someone comes into contact with this they die immediately, someone has to be in contact with the stuff That’s more lies from Putin , and indeed he should at least know the first person to die from this was a Russian , he was infected accidentally when working on it and took a year to die So why does he not tell the truth , right in front of the press line that Because he’s not very smart |
|
By:
You have to be in contact with this stuff , were the rooms even cleaned after the Russians where there any other guests
Maybe not |
|
By:
|
|
By:
for certain there's going to be another huge flood of syrian immigrants heading for europe and pootin doesn't mind that at all.
|
|
By:
The Strange Timestamp In The New Novichok ‘Evidence’
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=175845 http://www.moonofalabama.org/images6/novishot1.jpg http://www.moonofalabama.org/images6/novishot2.jpg http://news.met.police.uk/images/cctv1-equals-image-of-petrov-at-gatwick-airport-at-15-00hrs-on-02-march-2018-1407995 . http://news.met.police.uk/images/cctv2-equals-image-of-boshirov-at-gatwick-airport-at-15-00hrs-on-02-march-2018-1407997 . |
|
By:
Caught on CCTV: British Police Name Russian SPIES in the Skripal’s Poisoning
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=175822 |
|
By:
Re: the same time stamps.
I have seen an explanation that there are parallel gates at Gatwick and they walked through individual gates at the same time - hence the same timestamp. |
|
By:
exactly the same spot in each gate to the second, an hour and a half after landing?
its possible but surely you can price up the chances of it happening against the chances of a bit of dodgy photoshopping |
|
By:
they were on the flight from Moscow, provable in court, they were in Gatwick airport, provable in court, they took a train and booked into a hotel , provable in court, they were seen on camera at Salisbury train station and in Salisbury the day before the poisoning and the day of the poisoning , provable in court, they took the flight back to Moscow that same night , provable in court
|
|
By:
are there other photographs of the two , at that same spot, but at a slightly different time
its possible |
|
By:
they walked along a corridor, how many photos
did they reach the same spot at the same time because the time stamp shows`that? no the time stamp does not show that it only shows they at that time they were both there it doesn't mean they were there at exactly the same time to the sec, or left that spot at exactly the same time to the sec |
|
By:
donny osmond 06 Sep 18 09:47 Joined: 02 Mar 08 | Topic/replies: 78,158 | Blogger: donny osmond's blog
exactly the same spot in each gate to the second, an hour and a half after landing? its possible but surely you can price up the chances of it happening against the chances of a bit of dodgy photoshopping As I understand it, when you go through arrivals you get to a series of parallel gates which are one person wide and have to be walked through one person at a time. It's therefore natural for groups arriving at the gates to split up and walk through separate corridors at the same. As they are only short corridors it's not that unbelievable that they would hit the same spot at the same time. |
|
By:
You have a camera shot taken at the same time , and if you look the 2 men are at slightly different points in the corridor
( although it’s a different corridor as well ) |
|
By:
These are the gates apparently - posted by @bleidl on Twitter
[ This image is no longer available. ] |
|
By:
not that unbelievable
simple statement from plod might clear it up, or a bit of video footage even |
|
By:
that photo seems to show folk with luggage, where is the russians luggage?
juging from the amount of different coats they wore in the photos they must have had cases |
|
By:
I presume no one was allowed to sit on the bench so what’s your point ?
|
|
By:
so donny from "obvious photo shop job" is now reduced to but but "where's their luggage?"
|
|
By:
video footage would be nice, however the photo is what it is and shows the men to be there, and at that time, the flight times` are known and they are know to have been on the flight
on reaching the camera , in the corridor, different corridors, at the same time but at slightly different points in the corridor the photo was taken there seems nothing wrong in any way with that |
|
By:
look at the distance from the top of the head of one man to the entrance line of corridor, its slightly different , even taking into account different height of the men
|
|
By:
its not reduced to where is the luggage, thats additional,
based on passengers in other photo posted on forum having luggage with them. maybe its a different set of corridors before baggage reclaim? who knows |
|
By:
did they have hand luggage?
|
|
By:
photos show them both with bags
|
|
By:
maybe that's all they had with them , hand luggage
|
|
By:
in one photo one guy is wearing a back pack, but does not appear to
on arrival. |
|
By:
yes I noticed that, but you can only have carry so much luggage onto the flight
|
|
By:
so back pack likely in his case with his other coats, unless purchased, or nicked, or borrowed over here
any are possible |
|
By:
we can see they are carrying luggage, not a back pack, in the photos
|