This Energy Beam may be travelling faster than Light

May be? May be not is more likely.

The jet of plasma is believed to be caused by gas and stars being sucked into the black hole at the center of the galaxy. This gas is then heated up and shot back out by the action of magnetic fields. How exactly does the jet appear to be travelling at a speed that is faster than that of light? Well, this could be explained on the basis of Superluminal motion. In simple terms, it means – faster-than-light motion, and is observed in stellar objects such as quasars and in some radio galaxies which are thought to possess a black hole.

this guy sounds smarter than you Foinavon. ? Is that possible?

Anything's possible, zorro, apart from faster than light travel of energy and information in our universe.

I'm not registered with that magazine, zorro so I can't read the article.
I have bought paper copies of it in the past and there is a lot of journalistic hype to sensationalise their output couched in conditionals to cover their backsides.

Computer simulations based on the theory of relativity predict far more black holes than are observed.[1] Indeed, it is doubtful whether black holes even exist, and the latest observation disproved the prediction.[2]
"Quasars are disappearing" contrary to the theory of relativity, and astronomers simply "stopped looking" after finding more than ten examples of rapidly changing quasars that confound the theory with respect to black holes.[3]
The orbital eccentricity of the Moon's orbit is increasing, contrary to what Relativity predicts.[4]
The Pioneer anomaly.
The Sun is a perfect sphere - "the solar flattening is ... too small to agree with that predicted from its surface rotation."[5]
Quantum entanglement near the event horizon of a black hole—with one particle of the pair on one side, and other particle of the pair on the other side—defies the Theory of Relativity.[6] Relativity is a mathematical theory that cannot permit any exceptions, just as arithmetic falls part if 2 times 2 is ever not equal to 4. See also black hole firewall.
"I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being." - Albert Einstein[7]
The speed of light in a vacuum is slower than expected—less than c—based on new data from a 25-year-old supernova.[8]
"Celestial signals defy Albert Einstein. Strange signals picked up from black holes and distant supernovae suggest there's more to space-time than Einstein believed."[9]
A physics article published in 2014 states that "general relativity, which describes gravity at low energies precisely, break[s] down at high energies."[10]
Subatomic particles with mass have a speed observed to be as fast as the speed of light ("we are 100% sure that the speed of light is the speed of neutrinos"[11]), which contradicts Relativity because the Lorentz factor is then infinite.[12][13] Neutrinos were observed to travel at the speed of light by an independent experiment also: "Their neutrinos traveled at precisely the speed of light, not faster or slower."[14]
Anomalies in the locations of spacecraft that have flown by Earth ("flybys"). During the gravity assists from Earth, both the Galileo spacecraft and the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous (NEAR) spacecraft experienced a change in velocity different than that predicted by General Relativity.[15][16]
Spiral galaxies confound Relativity, and unseen, nonexistent "dark matter" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.[17] "Dark matter mysteriously missing around sun. Theories say neighborhood should be filled with it, but new study shows otherwise."[18]
The acceleration in the expansion of the universe confounds Relativity, and unseen "dark energy" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory.
Increasingly precise measurements of the advance of the perihelion of Mercury show a shift greater than predicted by Relativity, well beyond the margin of error.[note 2]
Despite wasting millions of taxpayer dollars searching for gravitational waves predicted by the theory, no direct observation of gravity waves has occurred.[19] Sound like global warming? Then, in classic liberal claptrap, the liberal media claimed that gravitational waves were discovered when in fact no such direct observation was made.
The discontinuity in momentum as velocity approaches "c" for infinitesimal mass, compared to the momentum of light.
Atheistic science admits that "observations don't match predictions, because the objects farthest from each other in the known universe are so far apart that the time it would take to travel between them at the speed of light exceeds the age of the universe," and implausible theories are created to try to explain it.[20]
The logical problem of a force which is applied at a right angle to the velocity of a relativistic mass - does this act on the rest mass or the relativistic mass?
The observed lack of curvature in overall space.[note 3]
The universe shortly after its creation, when quantum effects dominated and contradicted Relativity.
The action-at-a-distance of quantum entanglement.[note 4]
The action-at-a-distance by Jesus, described in John 4:46-54, Matthew 15:28, and Matthew 27:51.
The failure to discover gravitons, despite spending hundreds of millions in taxpayer money in searching. While these tax dollars were not necessarily "wasted", the lack of results indicate that scientists need to revisit their hypothesis.
Newly observed data reveal that the fine-structure constant, α (alpha), actually varies throughout the universe, demonstrating that all inertial frames of reference do not experience identical laws of physics as claimed by Relativity.[note 5]
The double star "W13" weighs "40 times as much as the sun—more than enough to form a black hole. So why is it not a black hole? The only explanation [a leading scientist] can think of ... does not make astrophysical sense."[21]
The inability of the theory to lead to other insights, contrary to every verified theory of physics.
The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.[22]
The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe.[23]
"According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous" but observations instead show "inexplicable static" greater than "all artificial sources of" possible background noise.[24]
"The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and Relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel."[25]
The theory predicts wormholes just as it predicts black holes, but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.[26]
The theory predicts natural formation of highly ordered (and thus low entropy) black holes despite the increase in entropy required by the Second Law of Thermodynamics.[note 6]
Data from the PSR B1913+16 increasingly diverge from predictions of the General Theory of Relativity such that, despite a Nobel Prize in Physics being awarded for early work on this pulsar, no data at all have been released about it for over five years.
The lack of useful devices developed based on any insights provided by the theory; no lives have been saved or helped, and the theory has not led to other useful theories and may have interfered with scientific progress.[note 7] This stands in stark contrast with every verified theory of science.
Relativity requires different values for the inertial mass of a moving object: in its direction of motion, and perpendicular to that direction. This contradicts the logical principle that the laws of physics are the same in all directions.
Relativity requires that anything traveling at the speed of light must have mass zero, so it must have momentum zero. But the laws of electrodynamics require that light have nonzero momentum.
Unlike most well-tested fundamental physical theories, the theory of relativity violates conditions of a conservative field. Path independence, for example, is lacking under the theory of relativity, as in the "twin paradox" whereby the age of each twin under the theory is dependent on the path he traveled.[note 8]
The Ehrenfest Paradox: Consider a spinning hoop, where the tangential velocity is near the speed of light. In this case, the circumference () is length-contracted. However, since is always perpendicular to the motion, it is not contracted. This leads to an apparent paradox: does the radius of the accelerating hoop equal , or is it less than ?
Based on Relativity, Einstein predicted in 1905 that clocks at the Earth's equator would be slower than clocks at the North Pole, due to different velocities; in fact, all clocks at sea level measure time at the same rate, and Relativists made new assumptions about the Earth's shape to justify this contradiction of the theory; they also make the implausible claim that relativistic effects from gravitation precisely offset the effects from differences in velocity.[27]
The Twin Paradox: Consider twins who are separated with one traveling at a very high speed such that his "clock" (age) slows down, so that when he returns he has a younger age than the twin; this violates Relativity because both twins should expect the other to be younger, if motion is relative. Einstein himself admitted that this contradicts Relativity.[note 9]
Based on Relativity, Einstein claimed in 1909 that the aether does not exist, but in order to make subatomic physics work right, theorists had to introduce the aether-like concept of the Higgs field, which fills all of space and breaks symmetries.
Minkowski space is predicated on the idea of four-dimensional vectors of which one component is time. However, one of the properties of a vector space is that every vector have an inverse. Time (formally: movement forward in time) cannot be a vector because it has no inverse.
In Genesis 1:6-8, we are told that one of God's first creations was a firmament in the heavens. This likely refers to the creation of the luminiferous aether.
It is impossible to perform an experiment to determine whether Einstein's theory of relativity is correct, or the older Lorentz aether theory is correct. Believing one over the other is a matter of faith.
Despite a century of wasting billions of dollars in work on the theory, "No one knows how to solve completely the equations of general relativity that describe gravity; they are simply beyond current understanding."[28]
Experiments in electromagnetic induction contradict Relativity: "Einstein’s Relativity ... can not explain the experiment in graph 2, in which moving magnetic field has not produced electric field."[29][30]
Relativity breaks down if a solenoid is traveling at or near the speed of light.[31]
The Pauli Exclusion Principle states that no two electrons in a closed system can exist in the same quantum state and if one electron changes all others must compensate. As the universe is a closed system when one electron changes state so must all others, even if they are thousands of light years apart.[32]
The 2014 findings of gravitational waves are actually just dust.[33]
The theory of relativity violates Occam's razor by requiring multiple new, implausible assumptions, including an invariant speed of light, denial of action at a distance, denial of basic, well-proven principles of quantum mechanics, and insistence that all places in the universe be equivalent to each other.

You bore me zorro. Too long, not read it. Have you read any of that stuff? Do you claim to understand it?
Give the source of your C+P (I probably know already).

All science in the last 2000 years is mostly from Christians, even Galileo.
It's only a recent phenomena where you get butt heads claiming science belongs to Atheists. For liberal PC types, it's a rare form of bigotry. "The creotards are holding us back?" it's apostasy highlighted in yellow. 

Sir Isaac Newton wrote over a million words about the bible, a considerable portion of his life examining his faith. Not a trivial amount of his time.

so now undermine all the christians that gave you what you have now...

Einstein's hero - James Clerk Maxwell - the shoulders of giants. (creotard)

Science - Cladding.

Foinavon
25 Jun 17 22:19
Joined: 11 Oct 00 | Topic/replies: 6,847 | Blogger: Foinavon's blog
There is solid logic to Relativity backed by experimentation.

Night night

Evolution gets cretinist knickers in a twist, that's a result for me.

Scientific beliefs are supported by evidence and they get results. Myths and faiths are not and do not."

Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life.

zorro you will have to learn to think in a logical way, this isn`t taught at school.
evolution does not invent anything, it is a process. Like growing old.

you don't get it, Satan looks at what God does and he makes a bad copy.
He's lacking true creativity. It's bad counterfeiting.

the tree of life
evolution

they lift terms and adapt. They do not create from scratch.

The one thing Satan does is flag up everything he does.
He always signs his work. you can trace it all back to Erasmus Darwin
who was the hero of Charles Darwin.

Initiated: 1754
St. David’s Lodge No. 36, Edinburgh
Source: Denslow.10,000 Famous Freemasons. For mother lodge cf. H. L. Haywood, Supplement to Mackey Encyclopedia of Freemasonry. 1966. p. 1198.

Erasmus Darwin - December 12, 1731 - April 18, 1802
Best known as the grandfather of the biologist Charles Darwin, Erasmus Darwin was a philosopher, poet, scientist and physician. Well informed on all aspects of late 18th-century science and medicine, he had advanced ideas on cosmology and evolution which he recorded in verse of a high quality.

"Before coming to Derby in 1788, Dr. [Erasmus] Darwin had been made a Mason in the famous Time Immemorial Lodge of Cannongate Kilwinning, No. 2, of Scotland.

"Sir Francis Darwin, one of the Doctor’s sons, was made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge, No. 253, at Derby, in 1807 or 1808. His son Reginald was made a Mason in Tyrian Lodge in 1804. The name of Charles Darwin does not appear on the rolls of the Lodge but it is very possible that he, like Francis, was a Mason."

As author of Zoonomia; or the Laws of Organic Life in 1794, he proposed the gradual evolution of animals and plants.

Initiated: 1754
St. David’s Lodge No. 36, Edinburgh
Source: Denslow.10,000 Famous Freemasons. For mother lodge cf. H. L. Haywood, Supplement to Mackey Encyclopedia of Freemasonry. 1966. p. 1198.

It's Hindu religion repackaged. It's a false belief with a kernel of truth. A big lie, well spun.

tens of thousands of species are he same as they were in the past. No change. Spiders, bats, fish, scorpions, crocodiles etc.

So what is the great inventions that evolution has produced? Let me know?

The human and other animals visual system, which is still more sensitive at visible light wavelengths than any camera we can make.

Many animals sense of smell.

In fact almost all mammalian systems. None of which we can replicate as well as the original.

i dont think origins of the species is the best example, far from it.

much better works since then.

science has moved on drastically since darwin, both with evidence supporting the evolution theory and the creation theory

*although I am unaware of any scientific evidence to support any creation story.

It isnt in human nature to do that Im afraid.
Just as in politics or Ideology and science and spitrituality the process is to rubbish the alternative to end with what then has to be the 'correct' theory.

Like capitalism's victory over communism lead to belief it was correct and in accordance with the 'rules of nature' only for it to continue in a death spiral of its own.

some people who push evolution theory are fanatics and need to take a step back and review all the evidence, if the creationist are using a scientific paper or research to support their theory then each piece of evidence should be considered on its merits regardless if it fits a pre-conceived narrative.

If the creationists are using a scientific paper or research to support their theory then I've yet to see it. I'm always willing to consider scientific evidence.
Just the evidence in the fossil record will show you that all species were not created at the same time but appeared (and disappeared) over vast periods of time.

if evolution is a big chain, the beginning is missing

It got eaten by organisms further up the chain.

That is fundamental to understanding evolution.

where's the starting point - because everything else is still here in life.
it's actually teaming with life - so it should still be here? happening.