Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 922 comments are related to the topic:
McCanns lose court case

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 15 of 24  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | ... | 24 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 922
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 13:41
I don't know if anyone has ever thought of that before,
It's subtle but it is a very powerful and critical piece of evidence which imo proves that the McCanns are innocent .
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 13:44
sorry it has nothing to do with my opinion.

Gerrys words when he described the scene at the apt to the police.

Those words , those few words , prove the McCanns innocence

I have explained why .
By:
Facts
When: 04 Feb 17 13:57
FOYDC
By:
akabula
When: 04 Feb 17 15:18
You at the wind-up lfc? If so wrong type of thread for that.
By:
xtrader
When: 04 Feb 17 15:43
I don't understand, could you explain it once more for me please.
By:
crystalhunt
When: 04 Feb 17 15:43
lfc1971
04 Feb 17 13:44
Joined: 06 Nov 11 | Topic/replies: 11,431 | Blogger: lfc1971's blog
sorry it has nothing to do with my opinion.

Gerrys words when he described the scene at the apt to the police.

Those words , those few words , prove the McCanns innocence

I have explained why .



Fcuk me - and here's me thinking they had something to hideLaugh
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 15:48
Akabula   I suggest you read what I have written, and try and understand it, before making stupid and insulting comments like that
By:
akabula
When: 04 Feb 17 15:53
I've read it and fail to see your point.
As regards my comment it was a question and asked in a civil manner unlike your response.
By:
A_T
When: 04 Feb 17 15:56
#alternativefacts
By:
akabula
When: 04 Feb 17 16:05
We are told that Gerry is a very intelligent chap with an analytical thought process.
Surely if the door had been moved and he noticed it wouldn't he have stayed with the children and phoned his drinking partners to join him?
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 16:08
Aka if you had read what I had written, and understood it, you wouldn't have asked  the insulting question ,
It doesn't matter if you think it was civil, if wasn't because quite simply of what it implied.
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 16:10
Now your last post shows you don't understand the first thing about what I wrote.
read it again .
By:
akabula
When: 04 Feb 17 16:16
I have and this in particular makes no sense. 'Could not and would not' is merely your take on the matter. It has no more or less weight than any speculation from other posters.

Because as I have already explained before if you read carefully what I said .....
Anyone planning a staged abduction and trying to pretend there had been an abduction could not and would not plan it so that ...
someone was in the apt when Gerry first went to check
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 16:21
That's correct ,
It is impossible that someone would stage an abduction in that way
By:
A_T
When: 04 Feb 17 16:21
it's long been a strategy of McCann apologists to attempt to derail discussions of the case
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 16:24
Now I can't go over this again step by step
Read what I have said
I have answered all these questions

But you have to be able to think for youself , just a little bit
and logically
By:
akabula
When: 04 Feb 17 16:26
You seem annoyed that nobody is able to follow your line of thought.
Ever thought you might be wrong?
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 16:45
If you were staging an abduction would you stage it so you were in the apt at the same time as the intruder

or would you stage it so you were somewhere else at the time of the abduction ?
By:
tobermory
When: 04 Feb 17 17:43
He is saying the door was more ajar , that he thought nothing of it at the time , but with hindsight he thought the guy must have been in there hiding .

How the fk does that undermine his abduction story ?

Your argument comes down to is  ' I've just noticed Gerry claims he is innocent , so this means he is innocent'
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 17:46
it undermines it  ,  because someone who had faked an abduction would never have said it.

Now again you will have to try and read everything I have said , and understand it
I am not going to take you through it step by step
By:
tobermory
When: 04 Feb 17 17:53
'step by step' ?

all you say is 'he wouldn't have said that if it was fake'

You have been told over and over why he would say that , and not once explained why he wouldn't
By:
itcanbedone
When: 04 Feb 17 17:53
Not the full shilling imo.
By:
SPOT THE DOG
When: 04 Feb 17 17:54
There was no abduction, move on
By:
lfc1971
When: 04 Feb 17 17:56
Tobermorey, you have understood nothing , do not allow yourself to believe that you have

I have explained all that.  now read it and read it again and try to undersrand
By:
TheBaron
When: 04 Feb 17 18:22
The number of people who seem obsessed with this topic is a bit creepy....what does it say about them?
By:
crystalhunt
When: 04 Feb 17 18:34
After 6 hrs sleep he's been on here since 6.26am. And still nobody gets it.
By:
1st time poster
When: 04 Feb 17 19:07
if lfc says he unitentionaly proved his innocence by the wording of his account ,doesnt that mean he could stiill be guilty,of course like he promised a lie detector test would prove their innocence to more of us
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 04 Feb 17 19:10
The Baron there are a lot of people who dislike the McCanns.  Think they represent a social order that gets unfair special priviliges and walks round with a sense of entitlement.  They feel the media coverage, money and help they've received is indicative of the class struggles they face that is stacked against them.  As such they are determined to find them guilty and punish them.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 04 Feb 17 19:13
That said I do believe they believe they are guilty.
By:
A_T
When: 04 Feb 17 19:15
plus the fact they left their children unattended, one disappeared, and since then have sought to blame anyone but themselves.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 04 Feb 17 19:29
yeah they haven't shown enough remorse either
By:
SPOT THE DOG
When: 04 Feb 17 19:39
Once again i ask...

Embedded Confessions.

Are you saying Richard D. Hall will be wrong for the FIRST TIME
By:
tobermory
When: 04 Feb 17 19:48

Feb 4, 2017 -- 7:10PM, CLYDEBANK29 wrote:


The Baron there are a lot of people who dislike the McCanns.

By:
tobermory
When: 04 Feb 17 19:48
ffs
By:
tobermory
When: 04 Feb 17 19:50
I think most people have looked at it closely enough dislike them , whatever their background. I would guess they maybe have more supporters amongst tabloid reading people , simply because they are full of propaganda on their behalf .
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 04 Feb 17 20:10
I recommend people watch Gone Girl with Ben Affleck and Rosamund Pike
By:
Facts
When: 04 Feb 17 20:14
Good - if not slightly confusing - novel..
By:
itcanbedone
When: 04 Feb 17 20:16
I thought it was a great book...film a poor relation.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 04 Feb 17 20:32
The last fictional book I completed was One Of Our Dinosaurs Is Missing, over 35 years ago.  In the last 10 years I've had 2 attempts at reading "How Sinderby Steeple won the FA Cup."  On the second attempt I got as far as the semi final where they were due to face AstonVilla.  I thought that's ridiculous, there's no way Villa could reach the semis so I never finished itHappy
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 04 Feb 17 20:45
GEORGE.B
Page 12 of this link - the petermac piece on the tennis balls picture - looks like a lot of work has gone into the article

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t8010p275-recap-on-the-tennis-balls-photo



There's no way to say this politely, some people really need to get a life
Clicking through that thread, the sheer amount of time, effort and dedication people have put into it is mind blowing even going to lengths of coming the texture and colour of the local tennis courts in the mccans used in England to the ones in Portugal to digging out weather reports the week before the disappearnace!

The smell of death picked up by the dogs has already been debunked, kate is a doctor, she worked with dead bodies days before her holiday and it was found of her clothing.

People also keep saying there is no evidence of an abduction, there is clear evidence of an abduction, there is a missing person. There is also no hard evidence of her dying in the apartment (see above).

And even if we worked on the basis the McCanns were involved, explain away how they managed to successful hide a dead body in an area they barely knew and got away with it for 10 years ?

Imagine the scenario, you have just accidently killed your child, within 24 hours, you have concuted a plan that involves 1. pretending she has been abducted, 2. successfully hiding the decomposing body without ever being traced, 3. spend the next 10 years constantly courting the media's attention when all common sense says to do the opposite (if you were guilty)

Like any unsolved case, wild conspiracy's arise and people find what they want to find and see what they want to see, the truth is however, you have precisely ZERO evidence of any wrongdoing whatsoever, and as it stands, they are two parents who have sadly lost thier child, but if it makes you feel better to keep pouring on the misery than you are a sad case.
Page 15 of 24  •  Previous | 1 | ... | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | ... | 24 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com