Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Absolute nothing.NIL zilch,no anything ,Nothing.
SO the nothing created something ,most say a big bang.
So that means nothing is our creator,nothing created everything.
Now you all can rest with the knowledge that everything came from nothing.
I have nothing to add.
apart from one question"do you think that the future generations will laugh at us and say we must have being as thick as planks to believe that nothing created something"
SO the nothing created something ,most say a big bang.
So that means nothing is our creator,nothing created everything.
Now you all can rest with the knowledge that everything came from nothing.
I have nothing to add.
apart from one question"do you think that the future generations will laugh at us and say we must have being as thick as planks to believe that nothing created something"
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 126
|
By:
the high priests of science, with their archaic symbols and spells,
strangeness minus three - Richard Feynman. the search for a larger grant. and a book contract with Penguin. |
|
By:
Well if we started at nothing, we must still be nothing
We are all figments of somebody or something's imagination, that would explain a lot  |
|
By:
Richard Feynman was a very good scientist.
He was also a bit of a lad as well....at a time when men were allowed to be men. He died in 1988. |
|
By:
the big bang theory - man o the cloth? get it up ya
Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître (17 July 1894 – 20 June 1966) was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Leuven.[1] He proposed the theory of the expansion of the universe, widely misattributed to Edwin Hubble.[2][3] He was the first to derive what is now known as Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article.[4][5][6][7] Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" or the "Cosmic Egg". wiki quote. |
|
By:
This should show you Zorro, there is meeting between science and GOD surely?
|
|
By:
He persuaded the Pope to stop making proclamations about cosmology.[21] While a devout Roman Catholic, he was against mixing science with religion,[22] though he also was of the opinion that these two fields of human experience were not in conflict.[23]
|
|
By:
When you think about it ,science is stating that the universe came from nothing and on the other side of the coin they state that you can not make something out of nothing(cause and effect),so which side of their coin is correct.
|
|
By:
But they all forgot one thing.God is alive and keeping well.
He lives in the Shapley Supercluster part of the universe,and guess what "we are all heading his way" Check it out,remember brass told you first.  |
|
By:
it's beyond the comprehension of human beings
|
|
By:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_fluctuation
|
|
By:
Precisely A_T, 'nothing' is a human concept.
|
|
By:
There wouldn't be a something without a nothing.
Yep next  |
|
By:
`nothing` is not a human concept. It is a mathmatical concept. And maths exists outside and independent of humans, it was always there, like all mathamatics, waiting for humans to discover.
|
|
By:
I thought the Chinese invented mathamatics about 3000 years ago and the greeks invented algebra ?
|
|
By:
you can have the 'big Bong' theory.
the christians have the big bang theory. 1-0. Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître (1894 –1966) was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Leuven.[1] He proposed the theory of the expansion of the universe. (Brought his theory to Einstein who laughed at it, whot you smokin mon). wiki quote. |
|
By:
Mr Einstein proved that all matter and energy of the universe arrived at the same time (in his GR theory)@ the big bang,this is my guess.IF the universe did not turn into a blackhole when all the everything of the universe was in the tiny ball before it expanded .think of all the everything in one tiny speck ,if it did not collapse then it never will.
And point number 2 =the universe can not be infinite if it started,and if it started it will have and end because it is finite.yet many scientists still argue about the universe being finite or infinite,and still agree on a big bang,i just don't get it.im confused. |
|
By:
There wouldn't be a something without a nothing.
Nothing as a concept is something, not an opposite. `nothing` is not a human concept. It is a mathmatical concept. And maths exists outside and independent of humans, it was always there, like all mathamatics, waiting for humans to discover. Not really, I think Null is the only mathematical term that relates to an absence of anything. |
|
By:
very good Alpha
Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître...why do you quote this man Zorro, when he is everything you are not? Lemaitre accepted that GOD and science can co exist. You Zorro want everyone to give up on Science and accept GOD created everything. Yes he did contradict Einstein about the expanding Universe, and he was right. A lot of Einstein's theories will be replaced or contradicted in time, Just as Newton's were. It is how science works, it progresses on the backs of those that have gone before. Science itself is neither good or evil, it the uses that it is put that are good or evil. |
|
By:
So the experts come out with a theory that the very first second of time came on the second of the big bang.
So the universal clock started to tick at that moment. Now any guy can tell you that time itself will never end even if the universe closed tomorrow time would continue as time after he universe closed. So the experts who told us that time originated @ the second of the big bang now tell us that there is no such thing as time,its an illusion . I think that there has to be something that was always there and it always will be there,something that will be forever just like time. |
|
By:
Do we really know what time is brassneck?
What is it's definition. I find it a difficult concept to think about myself |
|
By:
if I could get a photo of God sitting in his back garden in the shapley supercluster galaxy it could solve all the questions.
that its new name by the way the shapley supercluster at one time it was called Heaven,the planets in it are made of gold and everyone who lives there live forever.just like time that will last forever and it has started to call us all home.we are all on our way. |
|
By:
I often imagine what would be if there was absolutely nothing. Not even space. And it makes me feel happy.
|
|
By:
time is the only thing I know that will last forever.time is the overseer of everything and everyone.
|
|
By:
when we sleep there is nothing,everything is an illusion and everything in our dreams is never questioned ,all is taken for granted in the dream."ITS a strange world we live in and scientists can not explain why we sleep never mind dream"
|
|
By:
That is a lovely idea brassneck, I would wish it were true, not too sure about the name though
It was Einstein who started playing all these games with time, so let us all blame him.  He first of all said thing could not be just defined by their Cartesian co ordinates, but must be defined by the time they were at that point. He then takes this and says we live in a space - time continuum. Even worse he proves time does not always travel at the same speed. It can depend on our own speed. As we travel faster time will slow for us relative to time elsewhere. This has been proved by a jet aircraft whizzing round the earth with an atomic clock on board. When the aircraft the atomic clock was slow, compared to the one on the ground. When he comes to the speed of light Einstein gets even weirder. Light must always travel at the same speed, regardless of the speed of anything else. Light always travels at the same speed relative to us. His conclusion time itself travels at different speeds. |
|
By:
the aircraft landed
|
|
By:
Time is a dimension, how can it oversee everything? It's a point of reference.
|
|
By:
I will have to think on that Alpha
|
|
By:
I'm just having some fun with brassneck, but I am right.
Any point of our Earth's existance is still present, it depends how far away you are when you observe it. |
|
By:
Time as a dimension, we can only move forward in it, we can never move back.
We cannot help moving forward in it can we, time always passes. |
|
By:
in fact he proved that if you are waiting on a bus and stand at a tall building the bus will be slow about coming to you ,but if you stand at the bus stop 50 yards away and there is heavy traffic the bus comes quicker in your mind.
15 minutes to go and you are on overs and its 1-1 time goes so quickly,if you are on unders the same 15 minutes are endless.  |
|
By:
That's a contradiction, if we move in it, it must stay still so it can't pass. Each point of time is therefore stationary.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
brassneck
I will have to think on that Brassneck |
|
By:
time watches everything decay.
|
|
By:
sorry Alpha
|
|
By:
Time for bed..or is it? |
|
By:
|
|
By:
check out the shapley supercluster the only discovered it a few years back and its the biggest galaxy in the universe.in fact its a group of galaxies 650 light years across and hubble can not pick it up its view is blocked.
|