Maybe im naïve but what I cant understand is how so many of these people in the same circles would have been into the same perversion?
I mean abusing kids must thankfully only appeal to a very small percentage of people less than 1% surely but if these stories are correct most of the BBC & Tory party seemed to be at it.
How would you even mention that to other people to get involved its hardly the sort of thing you'd say over a dinner table & its hard to believe so many ordinary people like security guards etc would cover that time of crimes up.I certainly couldn't sleep at night if I turned a blind eye to crimes against children.

A bit like in Godfather 2 where the politician wakes up next to a dead hooker then completely changes his opinion of those friends of ours!

punkha1:
I mean abusing kids must thankfully only appeal to a very small percentage of people less than 1% surely


Would be astonishing if such a small percentage of people found it physically impossible to countenance something that was commonplace so relatively recently.


______________________________________________________________________________
A general great shift in social and legal attitudes toward issues of sex took place in the modern era and beliefs on the appropriate age below which girls should not be permitted to engage in sexual activity drifted toward adulthood. While ages from 10 to 13 were typically regarded as acceptable ages for sexual consent in Western countries during the mid-19th century,[1] by the end of the 19th century changing attitudes towards sexuality and childhood resulted in the raising of the age of consent.[4]

The English common law had traditionally set the age of consent within the range of 10 to 12, but in 1875 the age was raised to 13. After intense sensational media revelations about the scourge of under-age prostitution in London in the 1880s caused respectable middle-class outrage, the age of consent was raised to 16 in 1885. Early feminists of the Social Purity movement such as Josephine Butler and others, instrumental in securing the repeal of the Contagious Diseases Acts, began to turn towards the problem of child prostitution by the end of the 1870s.

The investigative journalist William Thomas Stead of the Pall Mall Gazette was pivotal in exposing the problem of child prostitution in the London underworld through a publicity stunt. In 1885 he "purchased" one victim, Eliza Armstrong the 13-year-old daughter of a chimney sweep, for £5 and took her to a brothel where she was drugged. He then published a series of four exposés entitled The Maiden Tribute of Modern Babylon, which shocked its readers with tales of child prostitution and the abduction, procurement and sale of young English virgins to Continental "pleasure palaces". The "Maiden Tribute" was an instant hit with the public. Victorian society was thrown into an uproar about prostitution. Fearing riots on a national scale, the Home Secretary, Sir William Harcourt pleaded in vain with Stead to cease publication of the articles. A wide variety of reform groups held protest meetings and marched together to Hyde Park demanding that the age of consent be raised. The government was forced to pass the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 that raised the age of consent to 16 and clamped down on prostitution.[7]

In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10–12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16–18 years by 1920.[4][10]

In France, Portugal, Denmark and the Swiss cantons and other countries, the minimum age was raised to between 13 and 16 years in the following decades.[4] Though the original arguments for raising the age of consent were based on morality, since then the raison d'être of the laws has changed to child welfare and a so-called right to childhood or innocence.[11]

In France, under the Napoleonic Code the age of consent was set in 1832 at 11,[12] and was raised to 13 in 1863.[13] It was increased to 15 in 1945.[14]

In Spain, it was set in 1822 at "puberty age",[15] and changed to 12 in 1870,[16] which was kept until 1999, when it became 13;[17][18] and in 2015 it was raised to 16.[19][20][21]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent

good stuff leopard.  don't be dissuaded.

Coming up in about 12 minutes on CH4+1

They were just ill-informed.

weekends at chequers ?

ta egner. almost nobody understands that point ( prob 'cos they are part of the '90% - 98%' !).  It's lonely being so right

meanwhile eastern europeans continue to traffick young girls and muslim led gangs run amok in most cities.
Super diversion these pursuits of dead men are.

Birds of a feather etc etc

.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3189951/A-vanished-file-troubling-claims-Heath-young-musicians-s-no-smoking-gun-week-shocking-headlines-Mail-s-unearthed-fresh-allegations.html

Frigid is just a cover for why he had no girlfriends.....why didn't MI5 expose him....because they were worried he had higher up friends, also paedophiles who could make them disappear.

https://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2014/09/12/edward-heath-the-paedophile-prime-minister/

@curious-cat's link seems to be mainly based around Times reports of allegations that Heath was in photos with an adult woman -- which even if they did exist (and this is denied by the woman) is hardly evidence of a liking for underage boys.

Minds

*obviously death sort of does, but others still can put together a defence

The secret service are in this up to their necks.