|
By:
other tv networks rule out employing him and his show
|
|
By:
That's the end of seeing the racist fat face being back on tv on any channel, good riddance, time for a national day of celebration
|
|
By:
i like clarkson, one of the best presenters on the BBC
|
|
By:
I agree.
|
|
By:
Good presenter. Whether he is an especially nice human being is open to question, but there is no denying Clarkson is one of the better presenters on the box.
|
|
By:
I made the Savile comparison 3 days back....he seems to be untouchable when he breaks the law just like Savile.
He is a great presenter but off screen he is a complete sucmbag! |
|
By:
Amazing how people can be obsessed with "celebrity" to the point of defending clarkson despite him having a previous reputation as an arrogant bully.
If this obnoxious buffoon was a an ordinary bloke in the town, thugs like him that did not want to ignore him, would be giving him grief regularly. Kind of sums up the drop in standards we now see, when so many will fight to re-instate a guy that would be hugely despised in any ordinary community. |
|
By:
Spot on
|
|
By:
Emden 14 Mar 15 20:50
deserves a written warning I totally agree, he should be told to fack off by the BBC on a a nice sheet of Basildon Bond. |
|
By:
In fountain pen ink.
|
|
By:
Like others before him at the BBC, Clarkson thought he had become indispensable, he hasn't & at the end of the day he will be sacked, walk away whatever you want to call it because now the BBC cannot be seen to indulge a total pr!ck such as this, he may be a brilliant presenter but in the current murky waters he has to go, what amazes me is he never realised that in 2015 he needed to reign himself in & if for that reason only he a friggin idiot & deserves to go.
|
|
By:
I like him.
![]() |
|
By:
Yes, Clarkson should go if (and it is a big if) the allegations are upheld but why the BBC overreacted by pulling the rest of the series is beyond me, and seems to show the BBC top brass is completely out of touch with the real world. In any normal company, the person complained about might be suspended but no company would shut down an entire building site or supermarket or whatever is the right analogy. For a start, it would be too expensive, as the BBC is about to find out when it has to pay compensation to all the foreign TV stations who have (a) paid for Top Gear, and (b) now must pay for a replacement programme, and (c) may lose advertising revenue when petrolheads don't tune in for said replacement.
If Clarkson were ill, they'd carry on without him, and that is what should have happened here. |
|
By:
http://i58.tinypic.com/fo2frs.jpg
|
|
By:
Comparing him to savile is pretty libellous i would think.
|
|
By:
Ibrahima Sonko 15 Mar 15 11:03
Comparing him to savile is pretty libellous i would think Probably.... but I doubt Savile's in any fit shape to sue... ![]() |
|
By:
Whatever your views of Clarkson, the way the BBC have handled this is laughable. And if the Mails headline is truly a quote from a senior head at the BBC then he needs sacking immediately, and Clarkson needs to throw the full weight of the law behind a lawsuit.
|
|
By:
Comparing him to savile is pretty libellous i would think.
An anonymous BBC source i.e fictious |
|
By:
Spot on facts, the executive who sought to smear the guy in this manner is beneath contempt. He should leave the BBC as this type of action brings the organisation into discredit.
|
|
By:
If the reports are anywhere near the truth then I can't possibly see a way back for Clarkson. Calling someone a 'lazy irish c***' and then smacking them one hard enough to require hospital treatment, is gross misconduct in anyone's book and instant dismissal. He'll be given 2 options - resign or be sacked. He'll resign. Top Gear will hopefully continue in a new format. It's pretty good light entertainment and has millions of fans. |
|
By:
shame the guardian doesn't have a similar campaign against daesh supporters or grooming gangs
you don't see anywhere near the number of open comments on those sort of stories if any at all!!! but mention farage or clarkson and the paper and on line sight is covered with stories and open comments - five when I last looked!!! |
|
By:
site!!!!
|
|
By:
I've heard that Claire Balding (the expert on every sporting event, and topic, under the sun) is standing in the wings!
|
|
By:
To re-establish audience figures, get her strapped into a rocket powered dragster!
|
|
By:
So no one thinks this has all been pretty much a set up by Clarkson and his 'management'? Seems blindingly obvious to me what has happened - contracts up at end of series (for all i think), he knows there is a demand for his services so creates a storm (no publicity is bad publicity after all) 'Oooh aren't i great and popular but unloved by my employers COME AND GET ME BIG BOYS'. He seems to have most fooled though........
|
|
By:
very good Clouseau
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Yeah it is pretty obvious isn't it Ib - after all he's got previous for doing this exact same thing but people seem to forget when it comes to 'celebrity'. Sometimes what is staring one in the face is the correct answer after all!
|
|
By:
good riddance to Clarkson, nobody should be able to get away with assualting and insulting a colleague like that. Nobody is irreplaceable, no reason why someone else can't come in and do a better job, and you should never assume otherwise. Who gives a stuff about the lost revenues to the BBC, it's not as if they ever reduce the cost of a TV licence
|
|
By:
Red Arrows documentary on now that replaced that rubbish top gear is a breadth of fresh air
beats anything top gear have ever done and these guys are real professionals and intelligent compared to the talentless plebs on top gear |
|
By:
Some other tv company will take Clarkson on if he does get sacked, already talk of something in America.
Top Gear finished if that happens as his two pals will go with him. Result increase in the licence fee to cover the gap this loss of income will cause but the pc brigade on here will be happy to pay the extra. |
|
By:
A breadth of fresh air in the same sentence that you mention intelligence. Comedy gold.
![]() |
|
By:
http://bit.ly/18tE4p9
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Good on you TSO.
But in all honesty I doubt Clarkson with all his wealth and the prospect of even more wealth coming his way gives a flying f%kc what you think. ![]() |
|
By:
BTW the petition to reinstate Clarkson has now over a million signatures.
Not counting your own how many signatures has your counter petition got? BTW I hope you are not cheating and offering free tips on the footie just to get peep to sign. How did your 11/1 accy go? ![]() |
|
By:
And yet Clarkson is going to ignore all those 'million' and resign? My - it's a win win for everyone concerned - he's the martyr sacrificing himself for his and the bbc's 'integrity' (expect the words 'too much respect for the bbc' in his statement). The bbc has the perfect excuse for getting rid and starting anew whilst still raking it in from the old 'Top Gear' for a number of years and this nonsense won't hinder that! The only losers i can see are tweedledum and tweedeldee who won't be going anywhere with Clarkson - other than maybe to iron his undercrackers!
I'm probably wrong of course............ |
|
By:
Nobody on chit chat is ever wrong.
|
|
By:
1,000,000 signatures on a petition just shows that the UK is awash in a sea of khoonts
|
|
By:
Awash?
![]() 69 million haven't signed it. |
|
By:
A million signatures when so many cant be bothered to sign it is a hell of a statement when the Ched Evans petition was lauded all over the BBC and Guardian for its numbers. A massive own goal by the BBC management who couldn't manage a creche according to the old sig character of the show.
Its time for the BBC to trailer a newteam of one man,one woman and one transgender presenter with black,lesbian and disabled aspects but look like Carol Vorderman,Claire Balding and Ant and Dec with no expense spared by the taxpayers to save their face. |