Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 173 comments are related to the topic:
Neets to do community work for benefits

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 4 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 173
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 19 Feb 15 09:55
You are such a tit, EO.
Nowhere near as bright as you think you are and completely blinkered.
Debate, discussion or attempted reasoning with you is pointless.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 10:08
(eg why should the scroungers have a TV, smoke, have a phone, etc etc blah blah?)

Absolutely, why should they have anything other than the basics that they can't pay for with their own money.
Just why should other people be forced to pay tax that is used to keep an army of scroungers in comfort?

As for alcoholics and junkies getting Disability Benefit, they shouldn't be able to afford their addictions let alone be given extra money to fund them.
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 19 Feb 15 10:20
I am sure it depends on where you live, who you know, what 'circles' you move in etc, but I know or know of loads, and I mean loads of people who are perfectly able to do some sort of job but who have taken the Benefits Lifestyle Option.  I know families of them, generations of them.  In fact, many more people like this than those who I would consider long term ill or needy or in desperate desire of a job.

They know exactly how the system works.

An example, boyfriend and girlfriend, about 18 years old.  No jobs.  Never had jobs.  Their benefits money covers a nice small one bedroom flat.  Going rate for working people about £450 pcm.  A single person on low pay would struggle to manage the outgoings for it.  Council tax paid for them.  Probably not a lot of money, but no pressures, no need to set the alarm for 5 a.m.  All the modern conveniences, gadgets etc.  They probably got their parents to lie and say them threw them out on the street.  Should we, as a society, really be paying for them to live like this?  Is it good for them?  Good for society?  I would hazard a guess that within 2 years she will be pregnant and soon they will be moving up the housing chain.

I dont know many millionaires, but all the wealthy people I do know have all worked hard.
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 19 Feb 15 11:34
The point is I am making my comments based on personal knowledge rather than assumptions.

I think you are the one making assumptions about the people I know!!!

Probablies…
'
Probably not got a lot of money; ? OK, then.  I don't know that.  Maybe they have a lot.
Probably got their parents to lie and say they were thrown out.   OK then.  Maybe they offered that them a room in their house - which they failed to take up because of what the state offers.

Does that alter anything?  If anything, and I am wrong, it makes it worse!
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 11:35
How much "tax payers money" goes to MP's, Judges, Military hierarchy, royalty etc, to live the life of luxury.
If you think these are all deserving of it, you are naïve.



So would you be.
By:
spellingandgrammarchecker
When: 19 Feb 15 13:39
I-phone
I-pad
X-Box
Sky television
Drink beer all day
Buy and take drugs all day
Buy and smoke ciggies all day
Place bets in local bookies all day
Buy and eat food
Pay electricity and heating bills

All on £75 a week single persons JSA

Where do I sign? Happy
By:
bongo
When: 19 Feb 15 13:50
they don't have loads of children

but they do have loads of the children
Two-thirds of parenting is taking place on welfare ( not even including child benefit here as that's not means tested up to 50k )
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:13
^^no wonder they're taxing us up to the hilt.

Here's another one they've slipped in:

If you own a property and it's unoccupied, despite the owner being liable for the full amount of council tax.  After two years of being empty the council tax goes up to 150%.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:15
What if you're an old timer who can't sell the property and can't let it either?

You might as well pay someone to burn it down for you.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:15
Seems a good idea, too many properties standing empty.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:16
Most of the empty properties are council owned.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:16
Ordinary people can't afford to keep empty properties.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:18
Well then there are lots of extra ordinary people owning property.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:24
What if you can't sell the property and can't let it either?

Lots of properties like that around areas with old mine workings
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:26
Well whats the point of owning it, give it away.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:29
Who to?
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:32
That's the kind of situations people find themselves in when they deal with property.

Benefit scroungers don't know they're born.
They think that BTL is all about making easy money.

No wonder they've all got f'all.

They know f'all and are worth even less.

They depend on hard working landlords to provide them with homes and pay the taxes that keep them alive.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:34
Not a lot of mine works in London thousands of empty properties, 1000's in B&B absentee landlords content to sit on an empty home.
By:
lfc1971
When: 19 Feb 15 15:35
If a house is empty there should be no council tax payable.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:36
They depend on hard working landlords to provide them with homes and pay the taxes that keep them alive.

Now I really know your taking the piss
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:36
^^In between tenants no doubt.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:37
Isn't it the truth?

Do landlords not provide people with homes?

Do they not pay taxes?
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:38
They solve the councils housing problems for them at a bargain price.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:40
Gee I never foufht of it that way what we need are more landlords.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:43
What about putting a statue of the unknown landlord on the spare plinth in Trafalger Sq?  so tenants can pay homage.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:43
Houses are worth a lot more in London, and the council tax is less of an issue where the value of the property is appreciating all the time.

It's certainly a big issue in other parts of the country.
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 19 Feb 15 15:43
You are perfectly free to debate, discuss and reason studyform and if you make a good case I'm one of the first to concede a point which is more rational than my own. The fact you are yet to do so doesn't mean it can't happen. One thing you can't do is argue with simple arithmetic and there are a hundred billion reasons why you are talking nonsense about austerity.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:45
So when you pay your landlord his rent TaC.

Don't forget to thank him kindly for all the favours he's granting you.
By:
lfc1971
When: 19 Feb 15 15:46
disgraceful having to pay tax on an empty property...sheer theft.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:48
You assume I pay rent?  why on earth would you think that?
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:51
That was just in case you did.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 15:52
it's the mega-rich who have all our money.

Our money?

When did your money become theirs?

How can they take your money when you've never had anything.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 15:54
Any idiot can be a landlord these days.  I know a few who think its the route to riches after watching too much property porn on day time tv.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 16:29
Any idiot can be a landlord these days.

Absolutely if they've got the money.

The difficult part is getting the money together in the first place.

That usually roots out most of the idiots.
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 19 Feb 15 16:31
The fact that an empty property is taxed at 100% whereas a single person pays 75% is scandalous.  I didn't know about the 150% rate, but to be honest, if somewhere is empty for that long they need to get rid of it.  And if they want too much for it, they need to get more realistic about the price.

Everything has a price.  It makes me laugh when people say they have had their property on the market for 12 months, but they can't sell it.  They are asking too much!
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 16:41
There are many reasons why a property can't be sold.

One reason could be that it's on a lease and not have many years left.
Try and get out of that.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 16:45
You can't mortgage it so it can only be sold to a cash buyer.

It might want doing up and you haven't got the money to do it up with.

So you can't sell it.
You can't let it, and you can't do it up. 

And the council tax goes up to 150% after two years of it standing empty.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 19 Feb 15 17:11
Nothing wrong with professional landlords the problem is that this industry has always seemed to attract a certain sort of git who treats thier tenants with contempt and is of the opinion that they should be some how grateful to them as if its an act of charity.

Remind you of anyone?
By:
luddite
When: 19 Feb 15 17:47
I've been away for a while and T and C has become almost rational(I said almost).  Whatever happened to the T and C of yesteryear, scourge of egos and super egos like sdk? World's gone mad. I preferred the old persona, me.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 19 Feb 15 17:50
who treats thier tenants with contempt

I've never met one of them.

You've certainly got the last bit right about the act of charity though.
Where would we be without our private landlords?

Living on the streets that's where.
Page 4 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com