Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 173 comments are related to the topic:
Neets to do community work for benefits

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 173
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Feb 15 21:43
I think people should work providing there is a full time job for them, on at least minimum wage which they can do
I have no trouble with that.
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Feb 15 21:45
How do you think people live on £70 a week....this aint no life of luxury
By:
Coachbuster
When: 17 Feb 15 21:55
Pish

if work is cyclical in nature then SOME of the unemployed at any one time could be given a liveable wage ,but i get the impression it's just another way of  providing free labour
By:
Wesdag
When: 17 Feb 15 21:55
Yet a significant minority seem to live and enjoy this non-luxury lifestyle.

A culture of entitlement has poisoned this society.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 17 Feb 15 21:58
How do you think people live on £70 a week....this aint no life of luxury
______________
people don't

those who are unemployed will have long thought of ways to attain a living for themselves as well as claiming CTB and HB- those who are hardest hit will be those who work in modest employment and pay rent .

That's a lose ,lose situation and is the most common scenario in the UK for the UNDER 40S
By:
ebulGery
When: 17 Feb 15 22:12
A bit of a generalisation, assuming all the unemployed are on the fiddle, only a minority do this

as in fact a minority in our society are on the fiddle from top to bottom.

Still we live in society which places personal greed above everything else, so it is predictable
By:
guinness2dear
When: 17 Feb 15 22:29
Crippen: Out of respect for a fellow poster i won't rip your bowels out on this fred.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 17 Feb 15 22:33
ebul - don't be naive
By:
akabula
When: 18 Feb 15 01:20
There are large parts of our cities which are eye sores which nobody is now paid to clean or will be in the future so I'd have thought that in addition to helping these people develop a work ethic they can be assisted to develop community pride and cohesion. Help and old lady with her shopping. Cut and old boys lawn. There's no end of possibilities and another really great thing is that old lady or old man may know somebody who is looking for a good honest grafter.

What a fantastic career path that is. Laugh
BTW the first part of that paragraph is what I was getting at. You say 'nobody is paid to clean or will be in the future'.
Why not increase the workforce at local councils to cover this?
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 18 Feb 15 01:35
How do you pay for them Akabula? Public sector workers are to a lesser or greater extent contributors to society but they don't generally generate income. What you advocate just involves taking yet more money off those who do generate income. Now if you were to advocate getting rid of all the non jobs which are usually advertised in The Guardian then maybe councils could afford to get back to doing things for which we pay our local taxes like keeping the neighbourhood clean and emptying bins etc.
By:
naydam
When: 18 Feb 15 02:09
The whole idea sounds like a glorified Bob-a-Job scheme. Dib dib dib.
By:
ebulGery
When: 18 Feb 15 10:05
Why not increase the workforce at local councils to cover this?

Yes an awfully good idea akabula.

Not everything can be run at a profit.
I notice yesterday the police are understaffed.
To pay for this we take taxes from those who can afford it.
By:
Wesdag
When: 18 Feb 15 10:41
And many who are paying the taxes are worse off than those sat at  home with no intention of working.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 10:45
When the scheme gets going and the unemployed get set to do menial tasks for their pittance, they might start to realise just how little they are personally worth.

Even the amounts they already get for nothing are generous when you add LHA to the bill.
And you have to include the people needed to collect the taxes, and the army of office workers required to distribute their dole money.
They are even laying on food banks for the unemployed now.

All that lot provided for people who are simply a drain on the economy.

And they've started complaining already.
By:
Wesdag
When: 18 Feb 15 10:59
Indeed.

The poisonous culture of entitlement that has dogged this country for decades.

People permanently parked on benefits with no questions asked in order to secure their votes.
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 18 Feb 15 11:10
The easy alternative, in the short term, for everyone involved.  Easy for the layabouts, easy for the government, easy for the police.

Thats the view of this simpleton, anyway.
By:
spellingandgrammarchecker
When: 18 Feb 15 11:34
This is good news for all councils.

They can now sack all their street cleaners, dustbin men, park wardens, toilet attendants, and those that do any other jobs that require little or no skill.

Then have them all back and do it all for free on JSA.

Thus lowering your council tax bill along the way.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 11:57
No it isn't good news for councils.

The councils will have to spend money on supervising the work and checking that people are turning up to do it.
The work they do will amount to little more than tidying the place up and helping out.
They'll be more trouble than they're worth.
They won't be doing anybody out of a job.

It's just a way of getting some of the unemployed out of their comfort zones and perhaps thinking that if they've got to do that they might as well try and get a job.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 18 Feb 15 13:44
Most of the unemployed would love a job outdoors tidying up and helping out Crippen.

The real question here is, if there are jobs out there then why can`t the job centre help out more? Why are these people unloaded on to the councils?

Why is the job centre such a failure?
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 13:52
Immigration is at the root of it.

The kids aren't being taken on and trained like they used to be.
They simply import ready trained workers from abroad now.

After the limited number of training places they are giving out have gone, all that's left for most of the kids is menial work.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 18 Feb 15 14:10
I agree it is by no means easy to find full time employment for the low - skilled. Immigration = cheap efficient labour to most businesses requiring low-skilled workers.

And as i have pointed out before most immigrants are working a skill level below what they would in there home country. So UK employers are also getting more brain for their pound by employing foreign workers.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 18 Feb 15 14:15
*their not there - see what i mean!
By:
Wesdag
When: 18 Feb 15 14:34
Indeed.

The working class - Labour's core support - have been betrayed by them throwing open the doors to cheap labour from the new EU countries in 2004.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 14:51
I wish we could go back to the seventies when the unions were ruining the country.
They wouldn't have stood for what's happening now with jobs and public services.

More people renting, low paid jobs, overburdened public services, the unemployed forced to work in the community.
We're going backwards.

The working classes have got nobody to represent them at all now. Certainly not the Labour party.
They're just being brushed aside, with governments putting company profits before anything else apart from themselves.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 18 Feb 15 14:51
My pal who is pro unlimited immigration said to me the other day.

`Education is really important for the kids these days` so i asked him if unlimited immigration gave them a brighter future or not, his reply was that we are also free to migrate.

Seems to be the libertarian point of view on this. I don`t buy into it.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 14:53
If you could go back 40 or 50 years, and tell somebody then what it would be like now they wouldn't believe you.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 15:00
AG,
So he refused to address the question.

Because if he did he wouldn't have much of a case for immigration in that regard.
By:
Angel Gabrial
When: 18 Feb 15 15:19
Correct Crippen, complete tribal denial.

He would be happy to live in Australia though.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Feb 15 15:34
you only need so many hands to pick up litter -it's not a major problem .

the worst areas are where the scruffbags already live ,so let them sort it out .Devil

I know my street is tidy because we  know  to behave ,we know what bins to use as well .

I believe  the longer term unemployed could be given a chance to maybe do some community work helping the elderly (where safe to do so )  maybe for a few hours a week ,but something that gives a little reward
By:
Eeternaloptimist
When: 18 Feb 15 15:42
It doesn't matter what they are actually doing. It could be digging holes and filling them in. The various benefits to them and society are almost incalculable.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 18 Feb 15 15:50
The problem is how long are people on these schemes?  Even the willing can become disillusioned if they aren't offered anything better after doing their bit for society.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Feb 15 15:51
NOOOOO eTERNAL - it's about self confidence and this govt takes it away from a great many through the pathetic system .

we live in a society where some really thick feckers make important decisions in society because they happen to be good at passing exams  .

Like - let's give someone a 60k  salary because they are good at making pretty shapes with playdough .

what about those who have actual talent and good decision making/problem solving  skills  but get overlooked ? a lot of these may end up unemployed  or in shyte work  , some go their own  way and milk the system for good measure  - and then it's misunderstood why none of them want to work lol
By:
Coachbuster
When: 18 Feb 15 15:52
luckily the internet allows clever people to use their brain to make money  these days - but it wasn't always like that
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 16:20
because they happen to be good at passing exams  .

Absolutely coachbuster I agree with you, there's not much else to go on that's the problem.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 18 Feb 15 18:10
Great news. After 6 months of community work you are now qualified for a zero hours, minimum wage job in a chicken gutting warehouse.
By:
Wesdag
When: 18 Feb 15 18:16
What do you suggest T&C?
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 18 Feb 15 18:18
Just pointing out the reality of the situation and why many choose to play the system when they look at the alternatives.
By:
Wesdag
When: 18 Feb 15 18:24
Yeah, stay in bed and let everyone else pay for their upkeep.
By:
Thin and Crispy
When: 18 Feb 15 18:29
Its human nature.  Those at the top end of the social scale play the system in a different way.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 18 Feb 15 18:31
It's all going nicely to plan.
Page 2 of 5  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com