Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 91 comments are related to the topic:
Bob Geldorfs poxy record

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 91
By:
HH Sultan Vinegar
When: 20 Nov 14 09:42
Why Adele was right to ignore Bob Geldof and Band Aid
Bryony Gordon wonders why, when it comes to charity, the rich and famous donate their precious time while the rest of us must donate our money

.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/ebola/11236278/Why-Adele-was-right-to-ignore-Bob-Geldof-and-Band-Aid.html
By:
twizzle22
When: 20 Nov 14 10:40
A good article...everyone who has contributed to this thread should read it.
By:
Facts
When: 20 Nov 14 13:20
These records are now seen in the same light as Children In Need night. A one off performed by ' celebs ' with the intent of persuading the public to part with their money. Who, although they could to umpteen existing charities, don't.
By:
dambuster
When: 20 Nov 14 15:28
Why doesn't scruffy boll ox ( geldof)and unfunny bollox (Lenny Henry), fu ck off to Africa with all there millions and set up a hospital.
By:
Dr Crippen
When: 20 Nov 14 16:06
It's like religion, if there was no paying there'd be no praying.

And if there was no publicity to be gained from these charades, as far as the pop world would be concerned the starving could go and eat dirt.
By:
lovegod
When: 20 Nov 14 17:22
It does seem that the showbiz world has to let everyone know how generous and caring they are, too many publicity ****s. Why can't more be like Adele and donate privately.

This thing the other year when various celebs went up Kilimanjaro, how much did it cost to fly them and a film crew? Why not just donate that money?
By:
twonky
When: 20 Nov 14 17:42
can someone please tell me, because I can't find the info anywhere...

What is the name of the company who will be handling all the collected monies for Ebola?
By:
lovegod
When: 20 Nov 14 17:43
And when you find out the name also find out how much they are taking.
By:
PatraTheCat
When: 20 Nov 14 17:50
And between them they knocked out thousands of children that were doomed to starvation, and maybe the spread of disease. And those children grew up and had more children, and so it will carry on.

It's an ongoing  problem that will probably never be solved by sending aid.

It may not be palatable to most, but to let them die off is doing them a long term favour.

Stop all aid and within 5 years there will be nobody left.

Problem solved.


Leaving aside the moral issue of starving an entire continent to death (not that you're racist, of course), there's a practical problem with your plan:

Lower standards of living = higher birth rates

The reason that the world would benefit from sorting out the giant mess that is Africa is that it is the best way of stopping its population from increasing so rapidly.

So the only reason you could have for wanting them to starve is simply that you enjoy watching them starve.
By:
call me a taxi
When: 20 Nov 14 23:32
I don't watch them at all. Unlucky.
By:
Mikael D'Haguenet
When: 21 Nov 14 13:07
Facts     20 Nov 14 13:20 
These records are now seen in the same light as Children In Need night. A one off performed by ' celebs ' with the intent of persuading the public to part with their money. Who, although they could to umpteen existing charities, don't.


I can't work out what point you're trying to make.
By:
Facts
When: 24 Nov 14 08:59
I'm pointing out a possible  reason for people's cynicism
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com