There has to be a new 'suspect' every so often, otherwise the Government would tire of paying for this investigation. Hence my earlier quip about you can set your watch by them.

If, and i say IF, the McCanns are guilty of more than neglect, then you would have to understand the morals - values, and probably more importantly the reasons why. It is my opinion, that any parent who had contributed to their own childs death, would quite simply be capable of anything.

i quite like the theory in the early days that one or the other doesnt no the truth and the one probably gerry coluded with 1 or more of the gang in a cover up,letting kate go check knowing she wasnt there,harsh but everyone agrees he,s one cold fish,as for why cover up an accident,
she may have been sedated
2 health care pro,s putting their career ist
reaction of the other kids
etc,etc

wow SH was making fairly sensible comments earlier in the thread ( though a bit too 'balanced' to the Mccans when the evidence is very unbalanced ) , now i can only think he has been on that pro McCann looney forum to be coming up with his latest posts

No, professional child thief's don't like to leave clues.



Seriously if there are such people ( are they in the yellow pages under P or C  ? )  , and they must be good as i've never heard of one being caught and convicted ,then how would they likely operate if a client has placed on order for a 3 yr old blonde girl ?

He could either... Go to an orphanage in Polsnd/Russia/Ukraine (of which there are loads if the adverts to raise charity money for them are a guide ) , say he wants to adopt said girl , pay what i imagine would be a fraction of what the paedo ring are offering him , and make a his profit when he delivers her . The biggest crime he would have committed in aqquiring the child would be bribing a bureaucrat to get around the adoption red tape . No one is going to be looking for her : the parents have given her up the orphanage have one less to look after , police/media interest is zero.

OR

he could get into an apartment , hope no one is there to challenge him or comes in before he leaves , kidnap the girl , hoping she doesn't start screaming (or maybe he sedates her, taking up even more of the max 4 minutes he has to do all this according to the 'checking' timeline ) , then -having left not a trace of his prescence -  carries her out ,walks through the streets with her , and gets away unseen . But he hasn't really got away yet even then because now police/media interest is far from zero .... instead we have the biggest police operation in the history of the country  and europe wide 24/7 media coverage .

They exist tober, children go missing all the time without trace, you might not hear about it so much in the western world, which makes this case so peculiar given the attention it's received with no end result.

Who is Eddie?

I see Martin is back on sky now.....it must've been a bit of a misunderstanding