Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
TheBetterBettor
26 Mar 14 12:45
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jan 12
| Topic/replies: 11,511 | Blogger: TheBetterBettor's blog
You look at yourself in the mirror on 18 September 2014 and you think about...

the 700 years of history....
You think about William Wallace
You think about the Poll Tax
You think about all that syphoned oil to fund the Westminster boom of the 80´s


and finally, you think about this could be a one off and only chance for real CHANGE...


You drive up to the polling booth and you vote.............................?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 68
By:
zorrostrikes
When: 26 Mar 14 12:58
i voted labour - like all scots that are not up their kilts. In the last fifty years at least - labour wins in Scotland is usually assured unless they get really pissed and vote SNP.
Yet Scotland is Ruled over by - Thatcher, John Major and David Cameron.
Democracy in action.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 20 Aug 14 10:20
Stolen from footy forum....

[   This image is no longer available.   ]
By:
erse2
When: 20 Aug 14 11:42
oor wullie for king
By:
Schalke 04
When: 20 Aug 14 11:49
YES !! it's the only way
By:
TiptheOdds
When: 20 Aug 14 12:02
If you vote NO Scotland will be the only country ever not to vote yes to independence.

There will be no more singing Flower of Scotland with heads held high.

The world will laugh at us.

Braveheart will be a label of ridicule...
By:
TheChaser
When: 20 Aug 14 12:14
Mel Gibson will claim it was a comedy
By:
Ken Masters
When: 20 Aug 14 12:19
Pretty much the only problem I foresee with independence is sorting out the party-wall agreement.
By:
Crisp77
When: 20 Aug 14 12:33
Sounds complicated. Luckily my name is Brian.
By:
Capt__F
When: 20 Aug 14 12:49
so's my wife
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 20 Aug 14 12:56
No
By:
Sica Dan
When: 20 Aug 14 13:15
Socialists and the SNP go on about being ruled by Tories, it
never occurs to them that Tories and Liberals sometines have
to put up with Labour Govts they didn't vote for.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 20 Aug 14 13:46
Scotland/England game a few weeks after vote

will have the p^ss taken out of us,if we vote NO
By:
TiptheOdds
When: 20 Aug 14 13:47
good point SD, except the Labour governments you speak of were at least elected by a majority of the voters of your own country...
By:
Ken Masters
When: 20 Aug 14 14:02
Not quite, the closest we've ever come to that in recent times is in 1955 when 49.7% of those who voted voted Tory, of a 77% turnout. They're always voted in on the biggest minority, which grates.
By:
Sica Dan
When: 20 Aug 14 14:21
Union of parliaments  came about because Scotland was effectively
bankrupt, no oil in those days. Salmond used to cite Ireland and Iceland
as prosperous small countries, needless to say that's forgotten and its
Norway and Sweden he idolises. I'm not an expert on Scandanavian politics
but I gather they are nearer to Thatcherism than Socialism.
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 20 Aug 14 15:25
Scotland/England game a few weeks after vote

will have the p^ss taken out of us,if we vote NO


By saying what? And who gives a **** if they do? it's a football game FFS.
By:
stewarty b
When: 20 Aug 14 15:50

Shrewd_dude




 


     Shrewd_dude   






  20 Aug 14 12:56 
Joined:


  12 May 05 
    | Topic/replies: 2,722  | Blogger: Shrewd_dude's blog   



No



Maybe shrewder than I thought.
By:
akabula
When: 20 Aug 14 16:52
@TTOs
What about the vast area of Scotland that is predominantly LibDem? Should they seek independence from the rest of Scotland based on your argument?
By:
TiptheOdds
When: 20 Aug 14 17:02
Ken M, I did say the majority of the voters not the electorate.

akabaula, there is every chance that Scotland will have PR for future elections - unlike the UK - so even LibDems could have representation at Holyrood.
By:
Just Checking
When: 20 Aug 14 18:02
"Ken M, I did say the majority of the voters not the electorate." - and you'd still be wrong.

Ken M is correct, Labour have never had a majority of the vote in a Scottish election, the closest party to do that was the Tories in 1955. (And that's including the SNP in the 2011 election who, contrary to rubbish on the internet, did NOT get a majority of the votes, and what they did get was on a very low turnout against a useless Labour party).

Indeed in the UK election in Scotland in 2010 the LD + Tories, who together form the governing party of they UK, achieved 465,471 + 412,855 = 878,326 votes, clearly not far off at all from Labours 1,035,528, but this was under FPTP that threw up wildly unrepresentative number of seats. I suggest you digest those figures for a second.

Not so you'd know the above facts given the hysterical crying of the "poor Scotland doesn't get the party it voted for" from grievance merchants who peddle some myth that the coalition had 5 voters in Scotland, it very clearly did not. For these 878,326 voters, > 85% of the number who voted Labour, the party they voted for DID enter government. It is not as remotely "unfair" as the b/s being peddled by the separatists, and as akabula points out, no less unfair than the people in LD seats getting the neanderthals from Labour every election because of people voting for more handouts. Scotland has a majority SNP government, but the majority didn't vote for them either. That's what happens with non ideal systems.
By:
john92
When: 20 Aug 14 18:18
The 'vast area' of Scotland that is Lib Dem of course has far fewer people per sq m, therefore it is exagerated on the map. If over a few centuries that area of Scotland develops it's own legal and education systems and becomes in effect a country within a Scottish political union then it would be a good comparison to Scotland within the UK now.
By:
atom burns
When: 20 Aug 14 19:09
ttip
By:
Alias
When: 20 Aug 14 20:58
That's what happens with non ideal systems.

The Holyrood system was designed to prevent domination by any single party. Juggle the numbers any way you want (and you will), but the SNP majority in 2010 was supposed to be as unlikely as to be impossible.

One Tory from 59 Westminster seats, yet a Tory govt  - that's democracy?
By:
bongo
When: 20 Aug 14 21:13
It's a curious quirk of voter history, but based on the party getting the biggest % share of the vote:
Scotland has got the Westminster govt it wanted in 8 of the last 12 elections
and England has got the Westminster govt it wanted in 8 of the last 12 elections.

That's not a bad ratio for a country with perhaps one-sixth of the pop'n.

I'm grateful that the Scottish MPs voted the way they did in the 2013 debate on whether we should directly support the anti-Assad rebellion in Syria
Outcome: 285/272 against intervention
Without Scottish MPs: 240/258 in favour of intervention.

Scotland: we'd like you to stay, but we should probably show a little more appreciation of you as you've saved us from ourselves at least twice recently.
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 20 Aug 14 22:06
Cliff Richard signed a letter demanding Scotland should stay......


What does that tell you?
By:
TheBetterBettor
When: 20 Aug 14 22:07
*open letter
By:
xmoneyx
When: 20 Aug 14 22:20
demanding or demeaning?
By:
Shrewd_dude
When: 20 Aug 14 22:42
stewarty b 20 Aug 14 15:50

Shrewd_dude 20 Aug 14 12:56


No


Maybe shrewder than I thought.


Of course I am you muppet.
By:
stewarty b
When: 21 Aug 14 13:54
Better to be a muppet than a retard.
By:
mememe
When: 21 Aug 14 14:22
I implore the people living in Scotland (please be aware that not all people who live in Scotland and can vote are Scottish) to vote "yes".
And I'm sure (gut feel from 60+ years of life, not from asking them) I speak for a lot of English people.
By:
Alias
When: 21 Aug 14 18:34
That's not a bad ratio for a country with perhaps one-sixth of the pop'n.

Eh? One sixth bongo?
By:
bongo
When: 21 Aug 14 21:23
Fair point Alias, one to nine might be more realistic as the ratio of residents of SCO to ENG.
By:
Foinavon
When: 21 Aug 14 21:42
In 2011 the ratio was closer to 1 : 10.7  SCO to ENG

(5.25 million Scotland, 56 million England)

according to UK office of National Statistics.
By:
dewey
When: 21 Aug 14 21:47
I haven't even given William Wallace a second thought,  ever.. let leave alone the last 700 years of history....Poll Tax is immaterial to me - syphoned oil to fund Westminster boom of 80's?

Wow! That's a hell of a life you've had TheBetterBettor...............Sad
By:
Foinavon
When: 21 Aug 14 21:49
I am not Scottish but if I were, I would vote Yes.

How on earth are you ever going to know what you are capable of if you don't at least try.
By:
dewey
When: 21 Aug 14 22:08
Fair point.........Gamblers United.
By:
SlippyBlue
When: 21 Aug 14 22:12
None of the Scottish people I know are voting yes.
By:
themightymac
When: 22 Aug 14 00:32
All the English people who live in my locality and there are quite a lot for a small place, are voting YES, like eternaloptimist plans to do. Only Scots that I know who are voting NO, and that includes 2 of my brothers, are ones that are married to English women. Perhaps they think that voting YES is an anti English vote which is complete and utter nonsense.
By:
dewey
When: 22 Aug 14 00:37
Scottish  people!- nearly as bad as Irish people (not quite though)!
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com