We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 2876 comments are related to the topic:
9/11 was it a conspiracy?
9/11 was it a conspiracy?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2,876
|
By:
Hackman , is this another of the thousands of details the US government " just plain forgot " to take care of???
why until this day has not one US senator or anyone else ever bothered to point something like this out other than silly, deluded, ignorant internet anoraks i wonder?? there was footage of the planes hitting the twin towers im sure you will agree at least! |
|
By:
ICABOD PEAPOD Joined: 15 Apr 07
Misspoker, if it can in your opinion be done with 15 people then tell us how! 5 Hijackers board 3 planes and crash them into the twin towers and the pentagon. Possible? |
|
By:
i also doubt a plane went through the front door as this would be about 7 feet high at most, for a plane to smash through a front door i would imagine is impossible as if it was that low it would have crashed long before it reached the building
|
|
By:
All the usual suspects have been about again and not one has even attempted to explain the lack of footage of the pentagon strike.
|
|
By:
I blame Thatcher
|
|
By:
Hackman, i explained it, you just do not want to listen
|
|
By:
Hackman!
1. it has to be impossible for a passenger jet to crash through a front door unless it was trundling across the ground at the time of impact!! even if it were possible... 2. there was a powercut and cameras were offline 3. the cameras were malfunctioning and awaiting repair 4. the window cleaner was obscuring the view 5. lets not even begin to talk of the impossibility of every person in the pentagon and their family and friends being willing to lie about what happened fool! |
|
By:
As I said,if it was Warrington Town Hall that was struck,there WOULD be footage I'm sure you'd agree.
So what would you see on a camera as an object, even 10 times the size of an airliner, whizzed by at 400 mph? CCTV cameras are normally trained on a particular site, or group of sites, not ready to try to pan at that speed. |
|
By:
The problem I have with your approach to the CCTV camera question, Gene, is this:
No camera footage exists, therefore this is evidence of conspiracy. My position is: no it isn't, it's evidence either of no camera footage or, if footage does exist, the authorities have it. And I'd still like someone to explain away all the eyewitness evidence of a commercial passenger plane flying into The Pentagon/plane debris etc. |
|
By:
All the usual suspects have been about again and not one has even attempted to explain the lack of footage of the pentagon strike.
Will YOU please explain how a static CCTV camera could possibly obtain "footage" of something passing at such speed? At very best, you'd get the swiftest blur. |
|
By:
Hackman, you are being beaten like a ginger stepchild here!
|
|
By:
Would people on here agree that architects and structural engineers are respected professionals as a whole?
|
|
By:
As respected and honest as elected officials and US presidents
|
|
By:
it must be true george bush saw the first plane hit the twin towers live on telly (ooops what do you mean the first plane was never shown on telly)
and the BBC was better than mystic meg by announcing the 3rd building collapse ages before it happened |
|
By:
Icabod you never answered me, You asked how 15 peole could pull off the attacks, 5 Hijackers board 3 planes and crash them into the twin towers and the pentagon. Believeable?
|
|
By:
yes and the people running away from a large dust cloud in the New York streets were all just paid extras
were you there??? if not just believe your own eyes and forget the nonsense spouted on tawdry internet forums |
|
By:
ICABOD PEAPOD Joined: 15 Apr 07
Replies: 2855 05 Aug 10 22:37 As respected and honest as elected officials and US presidents So, you have no respect for these guys knowledge then? |
|
By:
i have respect for common sense and my own ability to discern fact from fiction over 105th hand accounts of what anonymous people i never met may or may not have said once
The world's most respected scientists once swore blind the world was flat! I BELIEVE OTHERWISE, THOUGH I DO NOT KNOW IT FOR SURE |
|
By:
So, the fact that 1200 architects and structural engineers from all over the world ( AE911truth.org ), say that what they saw could only be done by controlled demolition cuts no ice with you?
|
|
By:
i am willing to bet 1200 architects etc proboably said the exact opposite!
when did the 1200 visit the site for detailed analysis if no planes struck how could thousands of people be kept quiet about it, as they would have to have been compliant accomplices! how could Al Qaeda be relied upon not to say " we did not do it" nope! all too far fetched i'm afraid |
|
By:
There must be several million architects and structural engineers in the world - if only 1200 think it must have been controlled demolition then they're clearly not at the top of their trade.
How do you know that claim is true, anyway? |
|
By:
ICABOD PEAPOD Joined: 15 Apr 07
Replies: 2858 05 Aug 10 22:52 i am willing to bet 1200 architects etc proboably said the exact opposite! when did the 1200 visit the site for detailed analysis if no planes struck how could thousands of people be kept quiet about it, as they would have to have been compliant accomplices! how could Al Qaeda be relied upon not to say " we did not do it" nope! all too far fetched i'm afraid Al Qaeda did deny any involvement in the "attacks" on 9/11, here's a link which shows that. http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/ |
|
By:
agreed!
1200 must be a tiny percentage of the world's architects and structural engineers, and lets face it a guilty US government would not let them near the ruins, all nonsense dreamed up to keep anoraks off the window ledge on a friday night i'm afraid. |
|
By:
there's quite an interesting documentary about how a very unique set of circumstances contributed to the damage and collapse of the seemingly uncollapsable twin towers. The name escapes me and no doubt the doubters will say the programme was government sponsored and funded...but interesting all the same
|
|
By:
Indeed, one small plus of this horrible event was the broader scientific knowledge it has brought about.
The Titanic was considered unsinkable, of course. |
|
By:
'Voodoo Histories: The Role of the Conspiracy Theory in Shaping Modern History' by David Aaronovitch
|
|
By:
the conspiracy theorists seem to have melted away
|
|
By:
PEAPOD. I peeped your mother - she loved it
|
|
By:
^ Unlike the iceberg that sank sparky's Titanic.
|
|
By:
'the conspiracy theorists seem to have melted away '
proof of global warming IMO |
|
By:
veck, you peeped my mother! she barely noticed as you never even touched the sides and cried afterwards!
how come you are back after slinking away , peniless a while ago when you could not pick a winner in a one horse race you tired little throwback  |
|
By:
sparkmaster. Joined: 07 Aug 01
Replies: 9631 05 Aug 10 23:00 There must be several million architects and structural engineers in the world - if only 1200 think it must have been controlled demolition then they're clearly not at the top of their trade. How do you know that claim is true, anyway? The 1200 are the people who formed the AE911truth.org group, I didn't say they were the only ones who thought that. http://www.ae911truth.org/ Check em out if you like. Here's a video showing wtc7 collapse alongside a controlled demolition for comparison, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73qK4j32iuo If you can be bothered to watch that clip, and still think that fire alone brought down WTC7 (the only steel structured building in history, EVER! ), then there really is no point in debating the matter further. |
|
By:
Thank goodness for that!
|
|
By:
Trifecta, i imagine i could source a video of an elephant climbing a tree if i tried
were you there yes or no???? |
|
By:
An if I can't be bothered. If the global scientific community doesn't think there is evidence of a controlled demolition then why should I? 1200 people supposedly claiming to be architects and structural engineers is nothing. And again, have you checked that they are?
|
|
By:
*And if I can't be bothered?
|
|
By:
orioles Joined: 26 Feb 03
Replies: 3154 05 Aug 10 23:23 Thank goodness for that! Very constructive, as usual. |
|
By:
Trifecta, a video of Saddam Hussein's minions denying that ethnic kurds were ever gassed is also available!
do not be so gullible sometimes the truth is just the truth arab terrorists plotted to hijack airliners and flew them into buildings, that is all! |
|
By:
Another name change, darling?
|
|
By:
 |