We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
No, Bertie. As you've failed to support your claims I assume you're lying.
|
|
By:
the zionist jews that control the banks control the government and they are a bunch of power crazed nut jobs, quick question, were are the weapons of mass destruction the usa claimed were definitely in iraq?
|
|
By:
sparkmaster you are clearly a victim of mind control therefore I have washed my hands of you goodbye
|
|
By:
I've thought. Most on the forum seem to think the US terrorised itself so it had an "excuse" for war. They haven't needed much of an excuse for various previous wars and other armed ventures, have they?
|
|
By:
There were no WMD in Iraq, a fact the free press in the UK and US, whatever their political leaning, have been energetic in reporting.
|
|
By:
Another one successfully beaten off, Sparky
![]() |
|
By:
Cobblaz, with your chatname you must be an authority on this conspiracy.
![]() |
|
By:
Bye Bertie!
Thanks Cobblaz. Alias, one of the conspiracy theorists actually posted something similar earlier. It's staggeringly irrational. If you can invade Iraq on basically a whimsy, why on earth risk murdering several thousand of your people in a scheme which, whilst admittedly fooling the finest academic experts, can be unravelled easily by the might of the chit-chat poster? |
|
By:
and 9/11 was set up to strike fear in the ppl to make an invasion to iraq/afghanstan seem to be the right thing to do
|
|
By:
Alias
Well, yes, my chatname is a bit of an embarrassment. But I'm not at all embarrassed by my view on this subject. And that view is succinctly given on the first page of this thread |
|
By:
And that view is succinctly given on the first page of this thread
Yes, and I agree with it. As someone pointed at earlier, the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved in such a secret conspiracy would guarantee its exposure. Absolutely ludicrous. |
|
By:
Simple question:
If the Pentagon -probably one of the most protected buildings in the world - was struck,in broad daylight,by a large passenger aircraft doing 400mph,at an angle that required it to fly at a very low altitude(no more than a couple of hundred feet)for at least several hundrede yards over a major city,why is there no cctv footage of it taking place? Just a simple explanation will suffice please. |
|
By:
simple questions;
if any very far fetched conspiracy which must have involved thousands of people perpetrated by the US government, jews or anyone else why then does it seem to be common knowledge amongst the world's internet losers? surely the conspirators would have taken even basic steps to try to fool the internet know all anoraks how many anoraks have reached their conspiracy conclusions through first hand knowledge?? im thinking zero HTH!! |
|
By:
So,IP provides the first non-explanation.
|
|
By:
very well!
why would the pentagon have cameras pointing up into the sky, is it not more likely to have cameras inside the building and covering entrances? other than observatories etc. i can think of no reason why any building would have cctv cameras pointed at the sky HTH |
|
By:
ICABOD PEAPOD Joined: 15 Apr 07
simple questions; if any very far fetched conspiracy which must have involved thousands of people perpetrated by the US government Doesnt have to involve thousands of people |
|
By:
hackman, how many of the pictures of 2 planes striking the twin towers came from twin towers cctv?
cameras generally do not point at the sky! |
|
By:
IP
If a passenger plane crashes into the town hall,here in Warrington,tomorrow morning,I can guarantee that cctv footage of it will be on national tv tomorrow night. |
|
By:
Misspoker, i would suggest that it would!
the relatives who took phonecalls from passengers who said arab looking people had taken over the plane, the organisers, every single member of al qaeda who would have to keep their mouth shut that it was not them etc etc etc, the list is potentially endless! many conspiracy theorists deny any planes struck!! so then we have the people who faked the footage and all the actors filmed running away from the fake explosion, the cameramen, lighting guys etc etc etc not one has ever admitted it was all faked! hmmmm!! |
|
By:
Only need about 15 people to pull it off IP
|
|
By:
CCTV cameras are usually static, or scanning/switching slowly. What "footage" could such a device capture of an object passing at 400 mph?
|
|
By:
the silence of every member of Bin Laden's terrorist organisation would be essential, are there only 15 of them?
why do you talk such unsubstantiated garbage? pathetic! |
|
By:
It all depends on which version if events you believe, but 15 people easy
|
|
By:
of*
|
|
By:
how was it done?
who were the 15 needed? |
|
By:
Plus, every eyewitness who described a commercial jet flying into The Pentagon would have to be lying. Or delusional.
|
|
By:
If, as we're led to believe, the global media are in on it, it's not a few thousand, it's a few million, including of course the entire scientific community. In an age when the President can't even choke a bit on a pretzel without the press finding out and telling people, this is preposterous.
|
|
By:
11 hijackers + 1 mastermind, =12
Hmmm 15 is a bit to high, preposterous indeed |
|
By:
British MPS cannot buy a 10 packet of cigarettes on their expenses without being exposed yet the US government, or some random jews can murder thousands of US citizens and not be caught, except by every delusional internet anorak who believes all the rubbish they read!!!
|
|
By:
Alias
Of all those cameras I would expect at least some footage of that plane. It could be the plane flying past a camera,or towards it,or away from it. As I said,if it was Warrington Town Hall that was struck,there WOULD be footage I'm sure you'd agree. |
|
By:
So Icabod how many people in your opinion did it actually take to pull it off?
|
|
By:
misspoker, you put forth the conspiracy would only need 15 people theory
i say their was no conspiracy, other than by arab terrorists, the ball is in your court! hackman! as far as i know no planes flew by the pentagon, again!!! why would cameras be pointing into the air ?? |
|
By:
Regarding the number of people required:
Several hundred who knew exactly what was happening. Several thousand who were close enough to know that something not quite right was going on,but whose status rendered their suspicions unworthy of serious consideration ,and their fear of losing their jobs made them very unlikely to rock the boat. |
|
By:
it takes around 15 people to run a tennis match ffs!!!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
I was just pointing out that it could be done with about 15 people, you called it "unsubstantiated garbage" and "pathetic!" yet this is exactly what you believe if I am not mistaken
|
|
By:
Hackman, a government murdering its own people in droves does not deal in the " very unlikely"
|
|
By:
Misspoker, if it can in your opinion be done with 15 people then tell us how!
|
|
By:
Some EXCELLENT stuff on here - Canny should be commended ... or horsewhipped ... I'm not sure which!
|
|
By:
*Canaryboy.
It's so difficult these days. |
|
By:
IP
The cameras,I would think,would be watching the front door of the most protected building on earth.They wouldn't be pointing at the sky. Hundreds of tons of plane smashes into the front door and not one camera sees it? |