We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.
Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.
Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.
To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home
|
By:
i certainly will read it ty. i do note however that you have chosen not to comment on my questions above. not sure why - they seem like they should be easy enough to answer for someone in your position.
|
|
By:
the law of statutes is the law of contract
I've got about 20 minutes, then I have to go. What does your statement mean? |
|
By:
regarding res ipsa loquitur - we are not debating the english language so it certainly does not speak for itself. we are talking about legalese, the language used in law.
ty anyway. |
|
By:
WTF's happened to cath's thread???
There's more than usual for her to take no notice of now. |
|
By:
[i] STATUTE is
|
|
By:
in fact im not going to bother having this conversation right now - off for weekend. if you choose to reply i look forward to seeing what you have to say.
|
|
By:
I hate to butt in, but surely res ipsa loquitur is the Latin language, not the English language
|
|
By:
he was indicating that the words i had questioned were obvious in meaning under law as they spoke for themselves. i am saying that is not the case - the law uses legalese, with the same words differing in meaning to how they are generally used in the english language.
|
|
By:
No.
When you say a contractual term, that has a very specific meaning. I think you mean is, consent a word that can be recognised in contract law? That's rather like asking, 'is bullfrog a legal term'? As I said, you're using a language you don't fully understand, so the logic becomes confused. If you're going to talk in strict 'legalese' as you put it, then you have to know what each of these terms means. |
|
By:
Sorry, on the 'phone.
|
|
By:
Cath22 :( has she gone down with swine flu ??
|
|
By:
Good to see the Mighty Orioles in full flow here,they say he has the tongue of a $1000 dollar a time wh0re!
|
|
By:
Was at the doctors today the place was empty I was the only patient in the middle of the afternoon, all tables, magazines and kids toys had been removed. Even the leaflet holders had nothing in them, only chairs in the middle of the floor, very eerie. I asked the doctor what was happening he said er er ah its just the calm before the afternoon rush :(.
|
|
By:
They reckon hundreds of deaths a day here in the UK :-(
|
|
By:
cath why did you pick Derby on that football comp, what's the affiliation with them?
|
|
By:
My Brother played for them in the 90's
|
|
By:
They reckon hundreds of deaths a day here in the UK
link please |
|
By:
oh right
|
|
By:
Firm Buttocked Dandy 03 Jul 20:40
Good to see the Mighty Orioles in full flow here,they say he has the tongue of a $1000 dollar a time wh0re! Now we're in your area of expertise, FBD. On this occasion therefore, I defer to your experience in such matters :) |
|
By:
Britain suffered its fourth swine flu death yesterday as experts warned there could be more than 100 fatalities a day by the end of the summer.
And more than 100,000 people a day could contract the disease after the Government admitted this week its spread was out of control. And health chiefs are terrified on learning that a major drug used to combat the virus may now no longer be effective. Health Secretary Alan Burnham said yesterday: |
|
By:
let me guess... daily mail?
|
|
By:
Wrong Mr Flea.
Can't talk I'm off to the beach, hopefully catch a wave or two. Bye |
|
By:
well I hope you'll give me a link when you return.
|
|
By:
Copied from above post.
All four Brits killed by the virus including the 19-year-old Londoner who died yesterday had suffered other health problems. But the speed at which the disease is spreading means that healthy young people will also be under threat before long Why does it mean that? They make it up as they go along. |
|
By:
And with one death occurring every 2,500 cases, the illness could be claiming 40 lives a day by the autumn.
The deaths seem to be all already quite ill people to start with. |
|
By:
Do other underlying health problems include baldness , a pot belly and halitosis? If so im a deadun
|
|
By:
Halle Belly?
|
|
By:
Another 3 deaths confirmed today :-(
|
|
By:
yeah, bet you were hoping it was 50.
|
|
By:
Is it just me who finds a computer graphic sad face a trifle shallow when talking about people dying?
|
|
By:
it is shallow
|
|
By:
sparkmaster. 06 Jul 23:28
yeah, bet you were hoping it was 50. Don't be a prat sparky of course I don't and thats a very unfair thing to say. The way this is going though we could be looking at them figures a day. |
|
By:
a day?
|
|
By:
why? Has this flu become more dealy than normal flu? I must have missed that.
|
|
By:
sibaroni
Sorry but I won't continue to answer silly questions like yours, they have been aswered time and time again. Your like the sparkless one above. |
|
By:
what do we have to do to survive? stock up on beans, bear, bogroll and bensons?
|
|
By:
rational?
|
|
By:
And again Cath what were you attempting to type or say?
|
|
By:
clacherholiday2 07 Jul 00:21
what do we have to do to survive? stock up on beans, bear, bogroll and bensons? Not sure if your joking, but if not .... Places like supermarkets will be no go zones, If I was you, when you do your weekly shop gradually stock on dried stuff and tin food. |
|
By:
You haven't answered them once, but never mind. I will answer it for you. Swine flu is no more deadly than normal flu which comes round every year. Therefore, whilst a nuisance to get, like all flu, it is nothing to worry about.
|