Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
From this morning...
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977941117&grpId=3659174697244816&nav=Groupspace
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474977941117&grpId=3659174697244816&nav=Groupspace
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 182
|
By:
Longer vid here
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234430/Mystery-spiral-blue-light-display-hovers-Norway.html |
|
By:
they say it was the russkies testing an icbm
|
|
By:
but most probably it was the alien mothership that had to get a bit closer to copenhagen so they could take over obama and propagate the myth of global warming
|
|
By:
looked like a revolving whole milky way and im not talking about the chocolate
|
|
By:
project blue beam.
|
|
By:
heeeeeeeeeeeere's Don!!!!
|
|
By:
Russian missile, easy, do you think they'd admit it?
goodness sake! |
|
By:
doesnt look much like it to me
video: http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27559&category=1 http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27553&category=1 http://www.vgtv.no/?id=27558 stills http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIg5eczY5Ms&feature=player_embedded The Russian ICBM was launched 700 miles away. They said that it failed in its 3rd stage.. http://www.itar-tass.com/eng/level2.html?NewsID=14626373&PageNum=0 does this light look like it is anywhere near space? since the 3rd stage boosts the payload into SPACE! |
|
By:
wormhole, nap.
|
|
By:
could well be cern causing some sht.
|
|
By:
cern successfully collided 2 particles hours before this phenomena happened yesterday.
i seem to remember cern scientists/physicists saying there is a small chance LHC could create small black holes but they say they could stop them before they could do anything. anyway - the light is stationary - how can a rocket fallin out of the sky be stationary |
|
By:
Fart of God.
|
|
By:
delz, brilliant theory, now simply ask why those religious believers will not believe you?
simply because they know god is not real I used to send private messages to people from the religious chat on yahoo messenger and say "I'm God", they would always reply saying am a "**ot", do they have any faith? |
|
By:
that was f@ggot barraway
|
|
By:
god of the bible, is a man. ultimate head of secret society pyramind. imho. and not actually a god, ie our creator.
btw tho, i dont see how evolution disproves that "god" exists. it depends what your defnition of god is imo. evolution fits nicely with theories of holographic universe, quantumconnectedness and bells theory. humanities subconscious creates reality imho - that collective subconsicous is god, ie our creator is our collective subconscious. my theory anyway :) |
|
By:
walofs :^0
|
|
By:
Doesn't anyone watch the **ing news? ITAR-TASS Russian news agency confirmed it was faulty test missile fire from Russian submarine.
|
|
By:
... so in light of a previous comment on this thread by someone, confirming it was them potentially means it wasnt...
when do governments ever tell us the truth about anything |
|
By:
John Carew in a miners helmet
|
|
By:
DonWarro..............WALOFS
whit ye daeing on a betting site anyway? God don't like gamblers!, get back to yer hovel and pray |
|
By:
HRH, Annie will laugh at that soon, she knows football
|
|
By:
perhaps you missed my explanation. i am not religious in anyway. this is a scientific perspective you ignorant gimp. :)
|
|
By:
quantum physics are not religious beliefs imo - they are theories, and in some cases proofs.
|
|
By:
evolution disproves god exists because god would not make genes which would create the "survival of the fittest" theory
|
|
By:
evolution disproves god exists because god would not make genes which would create the "survival of the fittest" theory
erm, no it doesnt imo. to add, i believe in evolution. but.. 1) could not evolution occur at the will of our creator, ie our own collective subconsicousness 2) assuming what im saying is correct, why would our creator not not make genes which would create the "survival of the fittest" theory. it differs from a religious perspective because they view "god" as being only good. in my view "god" (ie ourselves subconscisously as i keep saying) would therefore be responsible for all things , good and bad, and would create differing amounts of both constantly in order to maintain duality which is the basis of an illusory world. so your statements are irrelvant and shallow in there hypotheses. go read up on those subjects i mentioned and then maybe you can discuss this like an adult. you are as ignorant in your approach to the subject as any bible thumper imho. |
|
By:
evolution could occur as a result of our collective subconscious will to do so. ie it would occur when we needed it to, based on our surroundings.
so my theory is complimentary of evolution in a way. it is not christianity, islam or any other religion. these are clearly conditioning tools imo - although i dont mean to offend anyone when i say that, im sure i have, so sry. |
|
By:
What the heck have I started?
Having looked at photos more, it could well be a missile... Very strange pattern though. |
|
By:
returning to the subject of the thread -
"A top scientist at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) says that the titanic machine may possibly create or discover previously unimagined scientific phenomena, or "unknown unknowns" - for instance "an extra dimension". "Out of this door might come something, or we might send something through it," said Sergio Bertolucci, who is Director for Research and Scientific Computing at CERN, briefing reporters including the Reg at CERN HQ earlier this week." http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/06/lhc_dimensional_portals/ AND video of cern directortalking about dimensions/doors etc http://www.itpro.co.uk/617296/video-cerns-research-director-on-extra-dimensions |
|
By:
so cern smash 2 particles succesfully for the first time just before this happens...
|
|
By:
well when they properly run it next year, we'll see what happens... Personally i can't see anything like that happening, just a load of science crap trying to drum up interest in what is really an expensive hammer.
|
|
By:
so DonWarro, you're saying god might not be real? let's leave it at that
|
|
By:
DonWarro 10 Dec 21:20 evolution disproves god exists because god would not make genes which would create the "survival of the fittest" theory erm, no it doesnt imo. to add, i believe in evolution. but.. 1) could not evolution occur at the will of our creator, ie our own collective subconsicousness, WHY WOULD GOD CREATE EVOLUTION? 2) assuming LETS NOT what im saying is correct, why would our creator not not make genes which would create the "survival of the fittest" theory. |
|
By:
like i said in my initial comment on the subject punter, it depends what you mean by the term "god". i do not think there is a man in the sky controlling everything, no.
|
|
By:
if we are god - we would create evolution for our own benefit i expect.
|
|
By:
Don, is there a heaven and hell?
a yes or a no will suffice |
|
By:
If god does exist, hes got a hell of a lot to answer for. More bad happens in this world than good, and most of it caused by people who believe in one.
Anyway, g nite. |
|
By:
yes. but a yes/no answer will not suffice. we are all currently in hell, whilst we do not understand that we are god (the creator of this illusion) (or at least our subconscious is). when we do, and we exercise our own powers of being creators, we will be in heaven since we would be able to manipulate this reality as we wished, and therefore working etc would not be required. we could manifest what we want/need within the illusion of reality at will. of course we would need to reconnect with our own subconscisous, which would mean our subconsicous would in effect become our conscious state.
so again - hell/heaven meaning different things to the common understanding of them by religions in my view. what do you think hynosis etc is - its the controlling of subconsicous. when people are hypnotised their consicous reality changes. |
|
By:
no movement would actually be required to move from hell to heaven - it is all in the mind. so they are not literal places.
|
|
By:
so theology is crap
|