Forums

Cheltenham Festival

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 213 comments are related to the topic:
GRAND CRU GOLD CUP

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 213
By:
Catch Me ifyoucan
When: 30 Nov 11 18:38
Agree

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase

THE RSA Chase it is then !
By:
tomdeane
When: 30 Nov 11 19:36
Tom - he'd have to improve on his hurdles mark by about 10 lbs to win the Gold Cup.

Seems like I'm pushing this, so just wanted to reiterate I am in the RSA camp too! Just wonder what you guys think he would be capable of running to in a Gold Cup.

As strontium said above, he'd probably have to run to 177ish to realistically win the Gold Cup (possibly slightly less this time). My take on it is that he was well worth his hurdles rating of 167 and due to his age I'd expect him to at least match that over fences. What is key for me is that he seems to be settling much better this season, which suggests he should be capable of bettering that 167. I think, given normal improvement, he could well run to 170+ in either the RSA or the Gold Cup in March, so again, I think it comes down to how many others can do that in the Gold Cup. I don't think it's many this term.
By:
buddeliea
When: 30 Nov 11 20:48
Hes a novice thats had 2 runs over fences in small fields beating nothing of note,thats crucial for me in determining how he can fare in a Gold cup.
Its possible i guess that he can just turn up next March with hardly any experience of jumping fences and turn over horses that have been jumping fences at the highest level,he COULD be that good.
My personal opinion is that he could figure if its a weak field,but if Long Run,Kauto and Denman turn up he wont beat any of them,and i think they will turn up,and i would put him behind others like Bostons,Quito etc.
Not interested in his hurdle rating,or that some horses are getting on,just HIS ability to cope with a top chase field at the highest level,and thats pure guess work.
By:
tomdeane
When: 30 Nov 11 20:55
Fair enough Bud, that makes perfect sense.

You've probably made a better job of explaining the angle I'm taking here though by saying "if Long Run, Kauto and Denman turn up". I'd say that's probably unlikely. If by some stroke of bad fortune all three missed out, or even two of the three (which is plausible) I really wouldn't worry about Bostons Angel and Quito De La Roque. Just my opinion.

Of course this would all be price-related anyway. Understand where you are coming from by saying that the hurdles rating is not useful information on its own, but as I say, I think you have to use discretion on a case-by-case basis. I think GC jumps beautifully and wouldn't worry about his fencing against the big boys, and as I said, seeing as he is learning to settle better, I think in his case the fact that he was a 167-er over timber is a good guide to what he'll achieve over fences.

Or of course it could just be that I fell in love with he horse in the Cleeve and am looking at everything through some very rose-tinted specs.
By:
buddeliea
When: 30 Nov 11 21:09
Oh,hes got a big future over fences,that i am pretty sure of,so too has Bobsworth i feel.
These 2 could serve us a up a few classics over the next few years i reckon.
By:
denman85
When: 30 Nov 11 21:11
still cant get away from long run for gold cup, he jumped awful in betfair chase, if hed have jumped average he wud of won, also long run will improve as the season goes on as he always does, if big bucks wasnt around GC would still be hurdling, i think gc would fair better in  rsa, long run all the way to the bank for me... again!
By:
tweedledumbtweedletwat
When: 30 Nov 11 21:50
i feel sonofvic will play a major part in the rsa as well...loadsa positives to take out of his debut.
By:
strontium
When: 30 Nov 11 21:52
Budd's last two posts are a good summary of how I also see the position. GC is a future star, but for now he's an inexperienced novice, most unlikely to run to 175+ as soon as March.
By:
harry callaghan
When: 30 Nov 11 21:55
Tomdeane you make good sense...

For me personally..

I can see why the Pipe's are interested. For one they aren't a big fan of the RSA chase. Martin has made this point before. Also Grand Cruise is a seasoned horse who isn't backward, who, would just be put to sleep at the back and would be ridden for a place.

Anyone thinking of backing the RSA form from last year should beware, it was a weak renewal. Boston's Angel is not a Gold Cup horse, neither is Jessies Dream, and for those that think Quito de la slow!! will be able to lay up with the pace on better ground should also beware..

What does that leave us??

Well for me Captain Chris would be of interest as think he is classy, Long Run and potentially an improver in Grand Cru, who has already achieved a better figure than Bostons Angel and Jessies Dream after 2 starts..

People can argue the toss about being a novice..but because he isn't backward and with improvement very likely, with experience, he has a good chance of getting in the money..

RSA fanciers will know there fate after the Letherby and Christopher, but i would say the only place he will end up will be in the Gold Cup..
By:
resner not lesnar
When: 30 Nov 11 22:33
Tom, just interested to know why you think it's unlikely that Long Run, Kauto & Denman turn up for the GC. I would have thought that right now its more likely than not. Only an injury would stop any of them as it's clear that it's the main aim of all 3.

While I can see why the Gold Cup is being considered, Grands Crus has been very impressive so far and looks to have scope to improve further. I think the key to him fulfilling his potential is to allow him to complete his education amongst the novices this season.

Although he responded well and his jumping held up under pressure from Sonofvic, he will be put under pressure far further from home at a greater pace and by much better and experienced horses in a GC. I think he could well be a future Gold Cup winner but only if they don't rush it
By:
tomdeane
When: 30 Nov 11 22:59
^ I do agree - I think he would be more accomplished in a season's time and that's why they should go for the RSA this time. But my gut feeling is that his lack of experience would not cost him the Gold Cup.

I guess I am treating him as a unique case. For example, I'd be concerned about the likes of Peddlers Cross running in a Queen Mother even though he has jumped well because they go so quickly in that and there is literally no margin for error. But in the Gold Cup I don't really see it as the same issue with Grands Crus because he's got so much natural speed and jumps very well from what we've seen. If he's wrong at one five or six out, I think he'd fiddle his way over and be back on the bridle before the next. So it's his running style that makes him the different case in my eyes as much as his fencing ability.

And to answer your first question, I just feel it's unlikely the 'big three' all make it because it's very hard to get horses to these big races every time. Nicholls is clearly very good with this pair, but I think the issue of regression is also one to consider. Denman, for his wonderful attitude and undoubted class, has only won one of his last 10 races and would, like Kauto, be 12 in March. Kauto was majestic at Haydock but there is no guarantee Denman will return as gloriously. I am also a little perturbed that Kauto was trained so hard to win the Betfair that his participation in the King George is far from certain. He is a four-time winner after all. Seems fundamentally odd to me that he would not run there but run in the Gold Cup when Cheltenham has not been his very favourite track in the past. Or, maybe he does run in the King George and it takes too much out of him to go again in March.

Sorry for rambly nature of this message - guess it would have been easier to say I think there are multiple plausible scenarios to preclude the three of them appearing in March.
By:
resner not lesnar
When: 01 Dec 11 00:19
I know what you're saying, regarding regression & age but I can't see why any of them would miss it unless injured.

Denman's path (Lexus & GC) has been set out from word go, and even if he's bad in the Lexus I'd still expect them to give him one last go at the GC. I take on board the 1 win in 10 argument it's one I used against him in the Hennessy last year to try and prove he was past his best. However I was wrong, as his runs in the Hennessy & the GC show he is still a force. I'm happy to put a line through the Aintree run and expect him to go close in the Lexus if anywhere near his other two runs from last season.

I suspect Kauto will run whether they go to the KG or not. I actually think they'd be better off missing it and aiming solely for the GC. This would allow them to give him a good break and come back to the kind of fitness he showed at Haydock. I take your point about Kempton suiting better, but I doubt he can run like he did at Haydock so soon afterwards so I hope they miss it, I suspect they'll probably run though.

Long Run is a certain starter unless injured. And despite the fact that age, regression are against them I expect Kauto & Denman both to be there also.

I still think although last seasons staying novices have not looked up to standard so far that at least 1 or 2 will prove themselves contenders in the coming months - most likely the Irish ones (Quel Esprit, Bostons, QDLR, Rubi Light). Add to that the possibility of Weird Al, TFR, Diamond Harry lining up - although perhaps not top notch - I don't think running Grands Crus would be the wisest choice.

I know like me you think he should run in the RSA, but I do think he would be seriously stretched in a GC.
I've no doubt if he faced some of those names he could beat them now, but in a race against the majority at GC speed over 3m2 which could possibly stretch his stamina I would expect mistakes from a novice no matter how good.
By:
buddeliea
When: 01 Dec 11 07:52
Grand Cru, who has already achieved a better figure than Bostons Angel and Jessies Dream after 2 starts..

Harry,
       Whats GC's rating over fences based on??
By:
buddeliea
When: 01 Dec 11 07:54
And how does he get a better rating than Bostons and Jessies??

i suspect his hurdle rating is part of that myself,has to be in my eyes,and if so has no bearing on his ability to cope with a Gold Cup.
By:
bluebirdfan
When: 01 Dec 11 15:33
Anyone backed GC for next years Gold Cup with ****?
By:
tomdeane
When: 02 Dec 11 21:17
OK, despite hoping he goes for the RSA (at this stage), I've talked myself into a little ante-post bet at ~16/1 for the Gold Cup.

Simple reason being that I think that is too big a price. I appreciate that he might not run in the race and that inflates the odds, but you don't know if any of these horses will be running in four months time and with the option to trade out I don't see much downside.

If he bolts up in the Feltham, beating Bobs Worth easily in the process, he will be considerably shorter for the Gold Cup, and if he gets beaten he would not be good enough anyway, which means a speculative opinion punt at this stage would be throw away for the right reasons (misjudging his ability).

I completely respect the main arguments against him running a big race so early in his career. But... take a look at the ante-post prices for the Gold Cup, and look how threadbare the realistic challenge to Long Run is. As I said earlier in this thread, I personally do not rate last year's staying novices (at all) and although I wouldn't base my opinion on one bad run, Bostons Angel was desperate today and I don't fancy the likes of Quito De La Roque living with the pace of a Gold Cup field. Also don't think he's good enough.
By:
Mr Eboue
When: 02 Dec 11 21:19
16/1 ShockedShockedShockedShocked
By:
revedesivola
When: 02 Dec 11 22:46
i think 16/1 is shocking tbh, i think hes a 50s poke!
By:
tomdeane
When: 02 Dec 11 23:42
Unpopular opinion I seem to have!

You don't think from a trading perspective it's fair though? As I say, surely if he bolts up in the Feltham he'll trade a few clicks shorter and it'll be free bet time, or he gets beat and is not as good as I thought, so my underlying opinion was wrong and I can live with that.

Just my belief of course, but I expect him to put up a special performance on King George day.

And again, I really want to get most of the Gold Cup field this year. Really don't think there is any strength in depth at all.
By:
revedesivola
When: 03 Dec 11 01:14
youll be glad to know im generally wrong tom!
By:
buddeliea
When: 03 Dec 11 06:50
Cannot see him beating Bobsworth easily,if at all to be honest,that was some performance he put up beating Cue Card over a much shorter distance then he wants.
By:
barnesy
When: 03 Dec 11 18:37
tom,
how would you price up his cheltenham target?
By:
tomdeane
When: 03 Dec 11 18:50
I'd say 4-1 at this stage for the RSA and 12 to 14/1 for the Gold Cup (based on the weakness of the opposition). If he slams Bobs Worth in the Feltham I think he'll hit 10 to 12s.
By:
revedesivola
When: 03 Dec 11 19:01
i think bobs worth will beat him
By:
barnesy
When: 03 Dec 11 20:36
Sorry Tom, the way I meant the question was how would you price up the possiblity he runs in each of the races?
By:
tomdeane
When: 03 Dec 11 21:19
Sorry barnesy - I would say something like 3/1 he goes for Gold. If Long Run fails to impress (especially in the jumping department) again, then I'd say closer to 2/1.

Realise this sounds odd when I'm backing him at 16s to win it, but I emphasise this is from a trading perspective. Am basically backing my opinion that Bobs Worth will get tonked in the Feltham and I'll trade out.

A wonderful game of opinions as ever but surprised a lot prefer Bobs for the Feltham. He was good over an inadequate trip on debut and Grands Crus was not as impressive last time as previously but think firstly he's a better horse than Bobs, and that his better natural speed will work hugely in his favour round Kempton. I think he'll win easily.
By:
barnesy
When: 03 Dec 11 21:39
Tom, that would be my point that if you think at this stage he is 3/1 to end up in the Gold Cup you are effectively taking only just over 3/1 he wins if lining up in the Gold Cup.
As far as the trading perspective goes I would argue the stake you are using is better used to just bet him in the Feltham. We can both agree that he needs to win that race to even consider the Gold Cup and were he to win that I am sure you could still bet 8s at a very minimum for the Gold Cup and probably higher.
By:
barnesy
When: 03 Dec 11 21:50
Personally I hope that they stick to the novice route. For as great as Martin Pipe was his success in the top races was not amazing and persoanlly I put that down in some part at least to the short term attitude he took with his horses. He was never afraid to throw novices into open company and would often run horses 3/4 times in a week to exploit handicaps marks.
David seems to me at least to appreciate more of a long term view and I am hopeful he will keep the horse to novice events this year. Sadly, I think in order to keep his options open he ends up giving tight lipped answers such as 'the gold cup is in the back of our minds' so he does not close any doors. After the debut at Cheltenham the Racing Post ran a story that they were seriously considering the Betfair Chase just over a week later. Unsurprisingly, the horse was withdrawn at the 5 day stage. It's a shame every trainer isn't as open with the public about their targets as Paul Nicholls.
By:
tomdeane
When: 03 Dec 11 21:58
^ Makes perfect sense. It just depends a bit on your punting style really. I've been stung so many times ante-post that I prefer to get a position traded out very early and like the way this position could develop.

As I say, am banking on Grands Crus winning well and expect him to go off a fairly shortish price in that. I'd rather have my beans on at 16s and hope to trade out at around the 12-1 mark afterwards than have them on at say 6/4 - 7/4 and then have to weigh up whether or not I should put the cash on him at 12s for the simple reason that after the Feltham I don't see much happening on the track that would greatly influence his price, and even if he is to bolt up on Boxing Day connections will not confirm whether he goes for Gold or not, so you'd be sitting on a position that could be very hard to trade.

That's just my potentially convoluted take on it!
By:
barnesy
When: 03 Dec 11 22:21
Fair play Tom, best of luck with your trade, but not your bet haha ;)
By:
strontium
When: 03 Dec 11 22:43
I was more impressed with Bobs Worth than with Grand Crus at newbury last week, but GC was mega impressive at Cheltenham. BW is going to come on hugely for his debut and another half mile. I certainly don't agree the Feltham is a one horse race.
By:
harry callaghan
When: 04 Dec 11 12:54
Strontium..

Being a french bred, who jumps well. I'd take Grand Cruise to destroy Bobs Worth at Kempton on Boxing day and would make Grand Cruise 2-5 in a match bet..

Personally, I don't see this as the right race for Bobs Worth and would sooner see him turn up in the Dipper Chase as his next port of call and think he will.

Taking on Grand Cru on a track I think he will like, could be a mistake and could lead to ruining his progression. Henderson won't allow this to happen, for me anyway. His jumping needs more time and Kempton isn't the place for him to find out at this stage anyway.

I really don't see a Novice beating Grand Cru off levels at this point of the season..later on maybe..but he is progressing fast..

If you were Bobs Worth's owners. Why would you want to meet him in the gruelling Feltham, when you could just meet him next season in the 2013 Gold Cup!!

Easy...
By:
strontium
When: 04 Dec 11 13:08
Harry - I disagree that GC would "destroy" BW given how well BW handled Newbury, but in truth the only way to find out is if they race.

I fully agree it would be better for BW's education to have a spin in the Dipper and also that they may want to avoid a very hard race until they have to.... though surely it would be in the 2012 RSA before the 2013 Gold Cup.
By:
harry callaghan
When: 04 Dec 11 13:39
Well I just think kempton would be far more suited to the neat Grand Cruise..

Where as, a bigger track would suit Bobs Worth more..also think Grand Cruise and Kempton will put his jumping under the maximum pressure, which I don't believe is necessary for the likeable Bobs Worth at this stage..
By:
strontium
When: 04 Dec 11 14:13
I can certainly see the logic of keeping them apart and of giving BW a chase at Cheltenham.
By:
buddeliea
When: 04 Dec 11 14:43
From what i saw with Bobsworth the other day,i dont see any novice destroying him,not at all.
Beating Cue Card over 4 furlongs shorter than ideal is impressive form,and imo the best form we have seen yet.
I agree with those that say Bobsworth should go to Cheltenham next,think that will suit the horse.
By:
resner not lesnar
When: 09 Dec 11 10:25
While I still think they should stay the novice route, I wonder if the retirement of Denman will see GC backed again for this and connections give it serious consideration should he win at Kempton
By:
tomdeane
When: 09 Dec 11 20:40
Very probably - it all hinges on the Feltham I think. If he does smash up there I'm sure connections will leave the door open and he will be backed. Here's hoping for the trading option!
By:
strontium
When: 09 Dec 11 21:49
I believe it's already been announced he'll have an entry for the Gold Cup.
By:
strontium
When: 10 Dec 11 18:48
What does Champion Court's performance today mean for Grand Crus' form? One might say Join Together for the Gold Cup.
Page 3 of 6  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com